Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
- Useful Graphs From ChatGPT
- Fort Lauderdale Drowning
- Sinking Of The Titanic
Recent Comments
- czechlist on “The Hour Of Decision”
- Trevor on Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Trevor on Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- arn on Technology Advances
- Billyjack on “The Hour Of Decision”
- arn on “fair & equitable”
- arn on Michael Mann Continues His War
- Bob G on “fair & equitable”
- Bob G on Michael Mann Continues His War
- arn on Michael Mann Continues His War
Paul Ehrlich : Now In His Fifth Decade Of Dissonance
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
My favorite is still the huge chunk of ice breaking off in the antarctic causing a huge tsunami of heretofore untold destruction. That was back when the ice age was coming, a few decades ago.
You have to wonder why people who hold extreme views and demand drastic reductions in population to save the Earth are still here !
Whatever happened to “lead by example” or “do as I do not as I say” ?
The world is ‘overpopulated’ yet there is no mass starvation. After 2100 we may be worrying about an aging population worried about enough young people to support them. The challenge for humans won’t be overpopulation but a declining active population. Fertility rates around the world have been falling since the 1960s. But it’s still worse than we thought.
http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/global-population-10-billion-not-so-fast
http://geocurrents.info/cultural-geography/television-and-fertility-in-india-response-to-critics
When it’s pointed out how CO2 increases crop production, they come back with, “But the plants are lower in some nutrients.” It’s amazing how they cling on to their doom like a child’s “security blanket”.
Yes, the food grows faster, and provides significantly more bulk and nutrients, but, because the nutrients are not quite as dense, they claim to be dismayed.
Sadly if Paul Erlich came to Australia and said those things today the Sydney Morning Herald would hang on his every word and publish him without questioning a word.