Real Climate Science

A single shot through the right temple took the life of the 46-year-old Chief Executive

22 Nov 1963, 10 – Fort Lauderdale News

If you want to come to a reasonable conclusion about a topic, you have to clear your head of what you want to believe, clear it of what you have heard, and look at the data objectively.  That is how I analyze climate data.

Below, I motion stabilized the key frames of the Zapruder video, so that car and camera movements are removed.

• JFK’s head never lurched forward. Between frames 313 and 314 the camera jerked backwards, creating the illusion of a forward movement. I have removed this from the sequence via motion stabilization.
• In frame 315 a bright white circle appeared in his skull, and remained for several seconds
• Between frames 315 and 320, his head jerked sharply backwards, about 12 inches.
• By frame 323, he is starting to slump forwards.
• There is no indication of damage to the back of his skull.

So what is the bright white circle?  Most likely a soft incendiary or explosive bullet lodged in his skull. In frame 317, the clearly defined white circle is much brighter than anything else in the image.

The momentum of the bullet dragged his head sharply backwards between frames 315 and 320.

People don’t normally have bright white lights inside their skull.  The claim that JFK was killed by a rifle shot from the rear is simply ludicrous. This is not “conspiracy theory.” This is objective data analysis. My conclusion also agrees with the first news reports made on November 22, 1963.

Critical frames of the Zapruder video, showing the kill shot from the front right, and JFK’s head being thrown violently backwards.  And no, his head did not move forwards between frames 313 and 314.

Immediately after the JFK assassination, every newspaper in the country reported he was killed by a single shot from the front right.

22 Nov 1963, 10 – Fort Lauderdale News

Two days later the official story was that JFK was killed by a bullet from the rear, the suspect was murdered in police headquarters, and the DA distributed a map to the newspapers, which the police had never seen.

25 Nov 1963, Page 4 – The News Journal at Newspapers.com

Conspiracies simply don’t happen. Don’t fall victim to conspiracy theory – even when the intelligence community brags about them.

Democrats and climate scientists are very angry that Scott Pruitt will no longer allow them to steal tens of millions of dollars every year from the EPA.

EPA blocks scientists who get grants from its advisory boards | TheHill

Apparently the EPA administrator wants to end “the biggest fraud in science history.”

E.P.A. Head Stacks Agency With Climate Change Skeptics – NYTimes.com

I don’t blog under a pseudonym, didn’t discuss the costs of climate change policy, and was never contacted by the fake news New York Times – who create news by simply making things up. My presentation to the Washington State Senate consisted primarily of historical articles from ….. the New York Times.

Arctic sea ice extent is up 16% from last year.

2017     2016

Greenland ice growth is close to last autumn’s record high.

Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Mass Budget: DMI

Meanwhile, criminals in the press and academia insist that the Arctic is “melting more rapidly than expected.”

97% of government funded climate science is not a science. It is a criminal venture intended to defraud the public.

In January 1972, the National Science Foundation held a meeting at Brown University to discuss “climatic change” – when meant global cooling, which they said was of natural origin.

When Will the Present Interglacial End? | Science

Later that year, the participants sent a letter to President Nixon warning of a new ice age within a century.

THE ROLE OF NOAA’S CLIMATE PREDICTION CENTER IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CLIMATE SERVICES

The White House “seized” on the global cooling threat.

NASA’s top climate experts predicted a new ice age by the year 2021.

U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age Coming

The US Military responded to the global cooling, which they said was causing “extreme weather”

Everything which now gets blamed on global warming, was blamed on global cooling.

Scientists realized that global cooling was a potential big money scam for them.

In 1974, the New York Times reported on a meeting of climate experts in Germany. There was unanimous consensus that global cooling threatened the world’s food supply.

Walter Orr Roberts of NCAR was a key player behind this.

Climate Changes Endanger World’s Food Output – 1974 – NYTimes.com

In 1974, the CIA said global cooling would produce drought, famine, international conflict and political unrest throughout the world.

Daily News – Google News Archive Search

potentialtrends.pdf

The White House bought off on the global cooling/climate change scam, and by December, 1974 taxpayer dollars were permanently diverted extorted by the scientists. By the early 1980’s, the global cooling scam had seamlessly morphed into the global warming scam.

The climate mafia now denies the global cooling scam ever happened, saying it consisted of “nine paragraphs in Newsweek in 1975.” Climate criminals assume that everyone else is stupid and will believe anything they say.

How the “Global Cooling” Story Came to Be – Scientific American

There is nothing new about this however. Scientists have been pulling the same climate change scam for centuries.

10 Jan 1871 – IMAGINARY CHANGES OF CLIMATE

In this PRI article, the author conflates CO2 with “global warming” – and wants to starve billions of people to save them from micronutrient deficiencies.

Global warming threatens nutrition levels in staple crops | Public Radio International

Our entire food production and distribution system is based on fossil fuels. Without fossil fuels, there would be no food available for most of the world’s people – causing mass starvation like China and India had fifty years ago when their carbon footprint was small.

For progressives, starving other people to death for the sake of personal climate virtue signaling – is the highest form of morality.

If NASA and NOAA said “global warming is not a problem” they would immediately lose billions of dollars in funding. No one is going to pay them to study a non-problem.

They have a very fundamental conflict of interest, and they operate as the global warming team, coach, cheerleaders, referee, scorekeeper and press. They also try to prevent neutral third parties from offering an opinion.

It is difficult to imagine a more deeply corrupt situation or conflict of interest.  Forty years ago they obtained money by pushing global cooling.

Cooling or warming, it makes no difference to them. It is all about the money.

This morning, the Kestrel was hunting from an ice-covered Cottonwood tree.

The near record cold and ice was due to an overheated atmosphere caused by carbon emissions from the Valmont Power Plant

When he realized the danger he faced from carbon emissions, he quickly flew away towards the nearest shrew near the base of the tree.

Dr. Ruth from DMI, the Greenland ice growth and image processing denier – blamed last year’s record autumn ice growth on Hurricane Nicole.

Guest post: How the Greenland ice sheet fared in 2017 | Carbon Brief

This year is looking like a repeat of last year, but no hurricane. What is Dr. Ruth’s excuse for ignoring data this autumn?

Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Mass Budget: DMI

We are having our fourth October snowstorm in Boulder today, and yesterday afternoon never made it up to the freezing mark.

But on this date in 1950 it was 82 degrees in Boulder with 90 degree weather reported Colorado, Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona and California. More than half of the US was over 80 degrees that day.

From 1932 to 1950, Halloween was a warm day in the US. But temperatures plummeted after that and never recovered.