Real Climate Science

On September 29, 1927 the south was hot and humid, and the north was cold. The cold front brought a huge tornado outbreak to the midwest.

The Pittsburgh Press – Google News Archive Search

September 29, 1953 brought 100 degree temperatures to much of the Midwest. Imagine the hysteria if this happened now.

September 29, 1984 brought cold weather to almost the entire country.

There is no correlation between heatwaves and CO2, or extreme weather and CO2. People who claim there is are fraudsters, not scientists.

Colorado and New Mexico are getting slammed with very heavy rain and snow. Joe Romm calls this permanent drought.

Wolf Creek, Colorado

Taos, New Mexico.

On this date in 1953, Colorado reached 96 degrees and New Mexico reached 98 degrees.

Democrats are like two year olds. They can’t get through a day without protesting something. Here they are in Denver protesting the overheated atmosphere.

,

Update : Reader efforts produced quick results

———————————————————————————————————-

This genius is running for Boulder City Council

We don’t have any gun violence in South Boulder. What we do have is wetlands wildlife habitat which the city and CU want to destroy. That is the issue which people in South Boulder are concerned about. I pointed this out to him.

He responded by immediately blocking me.

This is typical behavior from the left. He has no interest in dealing with real problems or concerns of the public, and devotes his energy to a string of imaginary problems. He believes that building electric airplanes will prevent hurricanes.

He also thinks that trashing the US is patriotic.

Sad, but typical. Please tweet this post to him. The more people do it, the better. https://twitter.com/ericmbudd

Prior to 2012, the Arctic used to lose ice in September.  Now they gain ice in September.

masie_4km_allyears_extent_sqkm.csv

You won’t see this reported by government scientists, because it is contrary to their fake global warming theory.

“Football, beer, and above all gambling, filled up the horizon of their minds. To keep them in control was not difficult.”

– George Orwell  1984

The rest of the article is total BS, but they got the message that their behavior last Sunday was unacceptable.

Rain and snow today, but on this date in 1953, much of the Midwest was over 100 degrees. It was 109 in Texas, and 107 in Oklahoma and Kansas.

If this happened now, climate experts would say they were 100% certain it was due to CO2, and call for immediate world communism.

Hollywood people should probably stick with whatever they are good at. Drugs, fornication, etc.

With OJ Simpson getting out of jail, he can join his NFL teammates protesting unfair incarceration of black people – by trashing the flag and national anthem. Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman will not be in attendance however.

In this post I take down the second part of Nick Stokes idiotic claim :

Steven Goddard produces these plots, and they seem to circulate endlessly, with no attempt at fact-checking, or even sourcing. I try, but it’s wearing.

My source code has been out there for years. Nick has no excuse for his ignorance.

I just added it to UNHIDING THE DECLINE, to make it really easy for even the most clueless climate alarmist. (It is very wearing for me to have to deal with these clowns, who spread the same misinformation year after year.)

Download UNHIDING from here.  Click on the DOWNLOAD ALL button.

It will be downloaded as a very large zip file. The reason it is so large is because I have included the entire US daily temperature database. I did this is because Windows users might have a difficult time extracting the data from NOAA. I also have included everything you need to get the data directly from NOAA.

Unzip the file, and enter the UNHIDING directory. Unzip the US.zip file.

Then move the extracted US.txt file into the UNHIDING directory.

Enter the UNHIDING directory using a windows command prompt window or Linux/Mac terminal. Windows users can do this by navigating to the UNHIDING directory in Windows Explorer and typing cmd in the address bar.

That will bring up a command prompt window.

First time Linux/Mac users will need to run these commands. Windows users will not need to run them.

python3 -m pip install matplotlib
python3 -m pip uninstall numpy
python3 -m pip install numpy==1.12.1

The plot was generated using the command :

python3 ghcn.py US.txt first_year=1917 last_year=2016 USHCN

or for Windows users :

.\ghcn.exe US.txt first_year=1917 last_year=2016 USHCN

It takes a long time to run, and will appear like nothing is happening. Be patient. Your computer is processing several versions of the entire US daily and month temperature data sets.

Eventually a window will pop up like this. Select “CO2 “in the left column, and “USHCN FINAL MINUS RAW TAVG” in the right column. This will show how NOAA is tampering with the temperature data to precisely match their fake global warming theory.

The source code is ghcn.py. Nick can see exactly how the calculations are done. They are a simple numerical average of the USHCN monthly final minus the numerical average of the monthly raw temperatures, per year. Math doesn’t get any simpler than that. A third grader should be able to understand.

Linux/Mac users can get the NOAA daily temperature data by entering the GHCN directory and typing ./get.bash

Them move GHCN/ghcnd_hcn/US.txt into the UNHIDING directory.

Linux/Mac users can get the the NOAA monthly temperature data by entering the USHCN directory and typing ./get.bash

Then move US_final.tmax.txt US_raw.tmax.txt US_final.tavg.txt and US_raw.tavg.txt from the USHCN/ushcn.v2.5.5.[$DATE] directory into the UNHIDING directory.

Nick has no excuses for his ignorance or his ongoing attempts to misinform the public. Next time he or Mosher claim my work is not reproducible, tell them that they would need at least third grade math skills to accomplish that.

NOAA is precisely tampering with temperature data to match CO2 theory. Quite likely the most crooked, dishonest, corrupt science ever done.

In my next post I will take down Nick’s third idiotic claim :

The first GISS plot is not the usual land/ocean data; it’s a little used Met Stations only