Real Climate Science

Big Brother is watching you

• George Orwell

The mayor of Carmel, Indiana wants to stop climate change.

This Republican mayor is bucking his party to stand up for climate action

Had he done any actual research, he would have known that the climate of Carmel isn’t changing, or perhaps has gotten slightly better over time.

Indiana has many fewer hot days than they used to prior to 1955.

There is nothing the mayor can do to influence the climate anyway, even if he imagines himself to be a sort of god. King Canute understood this, but modern day politicians aren’t that intelligent.

“We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

• Barack Obama  October 30, 2008

Most of the warming NOAA/NASA claim is occurring, is during the Arctic winter.

By averaging all temperatures equally, they ignore the fact that there is essentially no latent heat in the Arctic winter. There is little evaporation, melting or freezing of water at -15C, so tiny swings in heat content produce large swings in temperature. By contrast, the Arctic summer and lower latitudes require much larger changes in heat to produce equivalent temperature changes. Note in the graph below how stable temperatures are near the pole in summer. During the summer, huge amounts of heat are required to produce small changes in temperature.

Ocean and Ice Services | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut

By averaging all temperatures equally, Arctic winter warming massively skews the global surface temperature record to exaggerate warming. This is one primary reason for the massive divergence between accurate satellite temperatures and worthless surface temperatures.

Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs

The global surface temperature record is a farce. It needs to be abandoned, as NASA planned to do 27 years ago.

01 Apr 1990 – EARTHWEEK: A DIARY OF THE PLANET 

Experts say the Arctic is record hot and melting down, but Arctic sea ice extent is the same as eleven years ago. Quite a meltdown.

?osisaf.met.no/p/osisaf_hlprod_qlook.php

CU students being exposed to EPA designated toxic CO2.

One hundred years ago, the great inventor Alexander Graham Bell foresaw a future where coal and oil were replaced by renewables.

100 years ago, Alexander Graham Bell warned us about the ‘greenhouse effect’

A century later, inventors have made no progress with renewables – because they haven’t figured out yet how to defy the laws of thermodynamics. 100% backup of reliable energy is still required.

The US has by far the best temperature record of any large area on Earth. We have an excellent network of 1200+ USHCN (United States Historical Climatology Network) stations with data going back to 1895 and earlier. The raw USHCN temperature record shows that there has been a slight cooling since 1920. USHCN is a subset of GHCND (Global Historical Climatology Network Daily.)

Cooling doesn’t suit the needs of NOAA and NASA, so they cherry picked a small subset of GHCND stations which show a large amount of warming since 1920, for use in the global GSN temperature record.

They claim that they adjust global temperatures to reduce overall global warming, but much of the fraud in the global temperature record is committed in their global station selection and homogenization, which has moved 15 degrees closer to the equator since the 1930’s.

ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/daily/ghcnd_gsn.tar.gz

This is the all of the US stations NOAA GHCND had available in 1920.

This is the tiny subset used by NOAA GSN GHCND in 1920.

The cherry picking of US GSN GHCND stations is a farcical tiny subset of what is available.

The average latitude of the US GSN GHCND stations has moved more than 1.5 degrees to the south.

The roots of this fraud goes back to at least 1999, when NASA’s James Hansen complained that the excellent US temperature record didn’t match the farcical global temperature record.

NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate?

So NASA and NOAA took a two-pronged approach to US temperature fraud.  For the global temperature record, they cherry picked a tiny, non-representative set of US GHCND stations. For the USHCN temperature record, they massively tamper with the data to produce fake warming.

Their data tampering precisely matches their CO2 warming theory. Science at its absolute worst.

The GHCN/USHCN methodology is all peer-reviewed, which shows how corrupt and incompetent the climate science community is.

Six weeks after documenting the wiretapping of of Trump’s phones, the New York Times says there is no evidence Trump’s phones were wiretapped.

Intercepted Russian Communications Part of Inquiry Into Trump Associates – The New York Times

Trump, Offering No Evidence, Says Obama Tapped His Phones – The New York Times

These people are criminals, not journalists.