Real Climate Science

Progressives believe that CO2 looks like this:

This is what actual CO2 looks like, spewing out of the Boulder Power Plant yesterday.

Old people in Ontario freeze to death in the winter, because their green electricity is too expensive.  Today they are getting less than two percent of their energy from wind and solar.

Gridwatch | Web App

Climate justice means killing old people in exchange for feelings of climate smug.

Progressives actively promote censorship and prosecution of any scientist who doesn’t fall in line with their scam, while complaining that Bush tried to “censor” climate scientists who did push their scam.

ExxonMobil tried to censor climate scientists to Congress during Bush era | Business | The Guardian

Work of prominent climate change denier was funded by energy industry | Environment | The Guardian

Taking tens of billions of dollars in government money is pure and just, but taking tiny amounts of money from other sources is corrupting, and requires prosecution.

The clouds have cleared somewhat over the Northeast Passage. It is completely blocked with ice, and new ice will be forming in the Arctic within five weeks.

NOAA adjusts US temperatures down about 0.1 F to compensate for Urban Heat Island Effects. Looks like they are only off by factor of 100.

NASA’s Bill Patzert says that there is no evidence hurricanes, tornadoes, fires, floods or drought are getting worse, but they definitely will in the future.

“Now, direct evidence of the footprint or the fingerprint of global warming: we’re seeing more frequent, more intense, and longer lasting heat waves. As far as hurricanes, tornadoes, forest fires, floods, and drought, the evidence is definitely not in. The consensus among almost all scientists is that it’s a small fingerprint, not a large footprint.  “But what is true is that in this country, in the United States, we live in many areas with great risk to drought, to tornadoes, to hurricanes, and so part of the dialogue is not only extreme weather and global warming, but is the amount of risk we can tolerate. Now looking to the future, global change, global warming – it definitely is accelerating and it will have an impact on extreme weather, but at this point, not much.”

I’m not surprised that he says extreme weather will get worse in the future, because his ongoing employment undoubtedly depends on saying that. But what baffles me is his assertion that heatwaves are getting worse. All of the data indicates that US heatwaves have become much less intense, less frequent, shorter, and covering a smaller area than they were 80 years ago. Even the EPA recognizes this.

High and Low Temperatures | Climate Change Indicators in the United States | US EPA

The bottom line is that empirical data shows no evidence extreme weather is increasing, yet scientists cling to this BS because …. their jobs, prestige and funding depends on it. They boldly appear before the public and make claims which are utter nonsense.

There has been no increase in extreme weather, period. Alarmists are terrified by the lack of hurricanes, because it shows that their models and understanding are complete garbage.

The U.S. coast is in an unprecedented hurricane drought — why this is terrifying – The Washington Post

Coming out soon, with a chapter written by me.

No, I don’t get any royalties ……

Greenland’s surface receives twice as much snow as what melts every year.

Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Mass Budget: DMI

If you show them the graph, alarmists will indignantly respond with this comment from the same document.

satellites measuring the ice sheet mass have observed a loss of around 200 Gt/year over the last decade.

The claim is that glacial calving is causing a net loss of ice, that is based on some decade old junk science interpretations of satellite data – which have been known to be bogus for six years. The geniuses who made that study didn’t take into consideration that the land is moving due to glacial rebound.

September 2, 2010 by M & C

The melting of the ice sheets of Greenland and West Antarctica is about twice as slow as previously thought. The study, conducted by TU Delft, SRON and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The scientists published their findings in the September issue of Nature Geoscience.

The melting of ice sheets since 2002 is mapped with measurements of the two GRACE satellites.These detect from space small changes in the gravitational field of the earth.These changes are related to the exact distribution of mass on Earth, including ice and water.As ice melts and sea, is this influence in the gravity field.

Based on this principle were previous estimates for the Greenland ice sheet at 230 gigatons of ice that melts each year (that’s 230,000 billion pounds). This results then in an average global sea level rise of about 0.75 mm per year. For West Antarctica was the estimated 132 gigatons each year. With these results, it now appears, however, were not corrected for glacial Isostatic adjustment, the phenomenon that the earth’s crust continues to soar due to the melting of large ice sheets of the last Ice Age, about 20,000 years ago. These movements of the crust should you take in the calculations for these vertical motions change the mass distribution of the earth and so they also affect the gravity field.

TU Delft – Melting rate icecaps Greenland and Western Antarctica lower than expected

Greenland has cooled sharply over the past six years, and satellite imagery shows that many glaciers in Greenland have actually been growing since 2013.

Alarmists will cling tooth and nail to ten year old junk satellite interpretations, but if you show alarmists NASA’s most recent research indicating that Antarctica gaining ice, they invariably respond with something like “satellite data is inaccurate and not reliable – contradicts earlier studies ”

NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses | NASA

Debating climate alarmists is like playing chess with a pigeon. They knock the pieces over, crap on the board, and then strut victoriously.

Iran just executed a scientist, who was spying on their nuclear weapons program – which Barack Obama says doesn’t exist.

Apparently Iran got their intelligence from Hillary Clinton, who says she never discussed any national security issues by E-mail while she was Secretary of State.

Cotton: Clinton discussed executed Iranian scientist on email | Washington Examiner

Every day gets tougher and tougher for the criminals at the New York Times and CNN to cover up for their favorite criminal and traitor.