Call the grammar police! The title of this post is to grammar, what the hockey stick is to science.
Arctic sea ice continues to increase past 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2011, and will soon start passing other years. No correction from the press about their big lie however.
The goal of the borg is to force compliance of thought on all matters. If everyone was neutered and thinking the same way, they would be much easier to control.
Locutus defeated the borg by introducing disruptive thoughts. Once some things are seen, they can never be unseen. Like how our trusted agencies NASA and NOAA are altering data to support Obama’s agenda.
After taking a long haul flight I absolved my carbon sins, rented a Prius in Denver – and pulled the climate back from the tipping point.
I then further saved the planet by driving the Prius to Fort Collins, where I hopped on my road bike for a ride in the sleet and snow along the Poudre River – and saw this group of Whitetails. See if you can spot them.
The trail is still damaged from the 2013 Joe Romm permanent drought flood.
My buddy Charles lunges in again!
This guy is awesome! I started the graph in the coldest year – the 1996 La Nina, and ended in what NASA claims is the hottest year – the current El Nino.
If the planet was actually warming, like it did from 1917 to 1936, I wouldn’t be able to construct a graph which was flat for 19 years. It would look like the graph below.
Charles, being a typical progressive, is unable to grasp the concept that in order for the world to be warming, the temperature would actually have to be increasing.
Climate experts are 99% certain that one of the blips in this graph is your fault. Can you spot which one?
Are there any government statistics which this White House doesn’t tamper with?
FBI figures tweaked to show phony increase in mass shootings, report says | Fox News
Check out this spectacular whopper from Carl Mears at RSS.
My particular dataset (RSS tropospheric temperatures from MSU/AMSU satellites) show less warming than would be expected when compared to the surface temperatures. All datasets contain errors. In this case, I would trust the surface data a little more because the difference between the long term trends in the various surface datasets (NOAA, NASA GISS, HADCRUT, Berkeley etc) are closer to each other than the long term trends from the different satellite datasets. This suggests that the satellite datasets contain more “structural uncertainty” than the surface dataset.
ted-cruz-says-satellite-data-show-the-globe-isnt-warming-this-satellite-scientist-feels-otherwise/
The surface data sets currently agree, because they collude and use approximately the same underlying data. More than half of the surface data is fake.
By contrast, Mears’ satellite data covers almost the entire planet.
NASA surface data doesn’t even agree with NASA surface data. What kind of pressure is Mears under to spout such nonsense?
Global warming theory is about troposphere warming. Why would you measure it in Urban Heat Islands, rather than by satellites measuring the actual troposphere? But the real story is below.
NSIDC rushed a bogus press release out claiming a record low Arctic maximum – which the press amplified with their usual lies.
Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis | Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag
The press in turn did their usual trick, and made the story into a big propaganda lie – saying the ice was “shrinking” at -30C.
The ice is surging past 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2011. The propaganda is out, and will not ever be corrected. Standard practice.
former (Colorado Springs) Mayor Mary Lou Makepeace was equally candid, saying she believes in human-caused global warming and prioritizes it as a concern. If we don’t do something to stop it, Makepeace said, “our children won’t be able to see Pikes Peak.”
EDITORIAL: Fix potholes, not global warming | eaglefordtexas.com
