Real Climate Science

On January 20, President Obama took credit for a drop in gas prices which he didn’t want to see and did everything he could to prevent.  Since then, gas prices have shot upwards in a hockey stick.

GasBuddy.com – Find Low Gas Prices in the USA and Canada

During February, 1902 – Rio Grande, Texas reached 104 degrees. If this happened now, climate experts would demand immediate world communism.

February 90 degree days in Texas peaked around 1920. If Katherine Hayhoe was presenting the graph below, she would likely truncate all dates prior to 1970. That is her usual MO.

The president wants $8/gallon gas and skyrocketing electricity prices, because he cares about the poor.

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlTxGHn4sH4]

http://www.bosnewslife.com/34667-breaking-news-100-killed-churches-torched-in-cameroon

Yesterday I showed how 100% of US warming since 1990 is due to NCDC filling in fake temperatures for missing data. The actual measured data shows no warming

The next step is to look at the correlation between how much infilling is being done vs. the divergence between  estimated temperatures and measured.

There is a very good correlation between infilling and inflated temperatures.  The more fake data they generate, the larger the divergence in temperature vs. measured. This is likely due to loss of data at rural stations, which are now being doubly contaminated by gridded and infilled urban temperatures.

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZHO1vo762c]

Weather and climate agencies around the world have been almost unanimous in declaring 2014 the hottest year on record — something that has promoted considerable chagrin among climate change doubters. That’s because these “skeptics” have long sought to cast doubt on man-made global warming by pointing to an alleged global warming “pause” or “slowdown” — going on to suggest that the computerized climate models that scientists use to project future temperatures are flawed, and overestimate carbon dioxide’s warming effect.

So, is that true? Do the models consistently overestimate the warming effects of greenhouse gases like CO2?

As a recent study suggests, the answer is no. While many models didn’t predict the relatively modest surface-warming “hiatus,” it’s not because they’re biased in favor of greenhouse-gas emissions’ warming effects. Rather, researchers report in Nature, these computer simulations just struggle to predict “chaotic” (or random) short-term changes in the climate system that can temporarily add or subtract from CO2 emissions’ warming effects.

No, climate models aren’t exaggerating global warming – The Washington Post

Impressive pack of lies for three paragraphs. Climate models are far outside the 95% confidence band, 2014 temperatures were nowhere near a record, and there has been no warming for almost 20 years.

Climate Analysis | Remote Sensing Systems

http://images.remss.com/msu/msu_time_series.html

The “weather agencies” are the climategate collaborators, all ignored more accurate satellite data, and all use approximately the same set of hand-picked tampered UHI infected data.