Throw out an ad hom, get burned by it, and then accuse the other person of a non sequitur for calling you on it.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Engineering
- The World’s Worst Scientists
- “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- A Real Hockey Stick
- A Real Hockey Stick
- Doubling Energy Costs
- Doubling Energy Costs
- “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Australia Permanent Drought Update
- Let Them Burn Wood
- “New computer modeling”
- Climate Destroying Shrimp
- What’s At Stake?
- Too Hot To Live
- What’s At Stake?
- “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- “Climate change is a myth”
- Racist Gas
- RFK Jr. Discusses The Green New Deal And Climate
- “world is on edge of climate abyss, UN warns”
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
Recent Comments
- Bruce of Newcastle on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Conrad Ziefle on The World’s Worst Scientists
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Francis Barnett on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Steve Cooksey on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- spren on “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Jack the Insider on Doubling Energy Costs
- Conrad Ziefle on Doubling Energy Costs
- Disillusioned on Doubling Energy Costs
Odd how Mark is the one playing the ‘put that person in the insane box by lying about them’ game.
He is the one claiming you believe something you don’t believe. While he denies the truth about only one scientist ever walking on the moon (the rest were fly boys) and denying that this individual is also not a global warmist faithful.
Talk about missing the ball every pitch! Good throwing on your part.
I went to his facebook page. He is an engineer for NASA???? Wow.
Talk about ‘stoopid’. This is embarrassing. But then, NASA has been steadily destroyed since I was a kid.
All his working for NASA shows is that he is a really good butt kisser.
Link? Thanks.
Dr Happer was fired by Al Gore for not kissing butt.
Happer, who served as the director of Energy Research at the Department of Energy from 1990 to 1993, said, “I had the privilege of being fired by Al Gore, since I refused to go along with his alarmism.”
He said in 1993, “I was told that science was not going to intrude on policy.”
(wwwDOT)epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=CommitteeResources.ViewNewsletter&Newsletter_id=e11153f5-802a-23ad-4c32-a36d03237dfe&SuppressLayouts=true
………………..
The White House and NASA on Tuesday defended comments that the nation’s top space official made on the Arabic news network Al-Jazeera about one of his “foremost” tasks being to reach out to the Muslim world.
Complete Coverage: Final Flight Of Nasa’s Space…
Interior Secretary Sally Jewell today challenged her employees to take an active role in the “moral imperative” to address climate change.
“I hope there are no climate change deniers in the Department of Interior,” she said.
I should also mention that no neutral scientist or engineer who actually looks at the subject of ‘Manmade’ CO2 driven Global Warming can do anything but laugh at the idiocy.
When NASA/NOAA can explain FULLY why the temperatures rose 10° C (18° F) in a decade at the end of the Younger Dryas or can explain Heinrich and Dansgaard-Oeschger events with temperature changes of up to 16° C, then they will have a scientific leg to stand on.
There are a lot of Mark Harrigans on Facebook. This one on Twitter lives in Melbourne and tweets about Australian politics. (There are a lot of Mark Harrigans on Twitter, too.) I’m not saying this one doesn’t work for NASA, but he doesn’t say so on Twitter, and if I worked for NASA, I’d say so on Twitter. Just saying….
“Oz-Mark” is the clue. To be sure, he is an azzhole and lowers the average Aussie IQ significantly.
Twitter does not make you ignorant, but it sure displays it for all to see.
+1
It is not just ONE NASA scientist anymore:
The group then formed:
ONE MORE MISSION: The Right Cilmate Stuff
Are you two talking to each other in these texts or is Haragan talking to someone else and sending it to the wrong person. His replies make no sense at all to me. It like two cross over conversations.
Welcome to the new Post Modern Scientific Logic. Aren’t you glad this guy is a US Government Engineer?
I wonder if he could answer “How much is 6 X 9?” without hesitation or looking at a calculator…..
He’d probably take 15 minutes to solve this problem by using Common Core methods.
And no it is not cross over. Look at the @ SteveSGoddard as the first person in the address.
That’s the MO of the Australian socialists … they have no capacity or logical thoughts.
The phrase “non sequitur” is the new “racist” claim. The purpose is to end discussion and claim victory.
Do they even know what “non sequitur” means? If they do, they have it backwards: what THEY say “does not follow.”
“Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and to remove all doubt.”
Subtlety is not a strong suit among climate alarmists, I see. One could see that maybe intelligence isn’t either. However, I think the real problem is they love to rattle on about things they don’t understand or have knowledge of as if they were experts. I’m 71 and it only took about one turn of the wheel to understand what Tony was saying. One of the greatest gripes about the space program of the 60’s was that there were no astronauts with a science background in the program.
OTOH, the fly-by-the-seat-of-the-pants methods they used to get to the moon required the skill set of experienced military pilots to insure the greatest chances of surviving the experience. It was thought at the time that there would be a new generation of space explorers to follow on the heels of those pioneers. What we got was the stupid, expensive, shuttle program which was kept in place long beyond its intended lifetime due to budget constraints and crony capitalism. Favored companies made a boatload of money refurbishing and re-launching relatively antique hardware back into orbit.
Here we are 50 years later finally starting where the Apollo program left off. Those of us who were excited by the moon landings have waited while President Johnson’s Great Society movement has sucked all the money out of the room along with a space vehicle which was quickly outdated by technology, but which made a lot of government crony contractors rich. The government has completely dropped the ball in this area. Here’s hoping there are industrial pioneers enough to pick up the ball and run with it.
Exploration of new territory fires up the imagination of those with a pioneering spirit. It also generates new technologies and better ways of doing things. Today propulsion technologies are being tested that could put us on Mars in 60 days. In the time it takes for me to drive from Yuma, AZ, to Disney World we can put a man in orbit around the moon from the surface of the earth ready to go to work. We did it 50 years ago. What are we waiting for?
Why do we need to begin visiting our nearby space neighbors? It’s because they are there and they have wondrous things to show us. We will not learn from a dozen robot probes what one scientist standing on Mars can determine in a dozen hours with the right test equipment.
Wow. All of this poured out of me just thinking about the lack of scientists in the Apollo astronaut program.
Um, the VIETNAM WAR sucked all the money down the old drain. It killed the space programs. And the US dollar, too.
absolutely true emsnews. He carved NASA down to nothing and put thousands of engineers and scientists on the street to pay for what he couldn’t borrow to finance the war. Then along came Nixon, Ford, and Carter who had to find ways to pay the piper and NASA was not going to get a look back in ever after.
+1
Just so you know I know, yes there were a few scientists put in the mix later in the Apollo program and we began to learn some things about the geology of the moon. They scratched the surface (pun intended) of what there is to learn.
Weren’t those the days Ernest? The possibilities opened to us kids in the sixties and seventies were slammed shut by the politicians intent on buy votes with our money and their corporate buddies sucking up as much of our wealth as they could.
It seems the ‘elite’ like the Bilderburgers and Club of Rome are only interested in what type of breaks the can put on civilization.
The space race was far more about getting there than what they would do once there. The first 3 groups of Astronauts were all selected in large part based on test pilot experience and having engineering education. Thus the greatest stick and rudder man still an active military test pilot, Chuck Yeager simply did not qualify even though at about that same time he was running the Air Force test pilot school. There were 30 of the fly boys taken before the 4th group which consisted of 4 scientists and a physician selected.
Among that fourth group, Schmitt had the inside track for a Moon mission because he was already high up in the group of geologists supporting the Apollo program and thus well connected. Even then it took a direct order from the Vice President to grounded astronaut Deke Slayton, who was in charge of crew assignments, to get Schmitt in the Lunar lander for the final Apollo mission. Deke and about every one else involved just didn’t think it was fair to take that seat away from the many more senior and experienced Astronauts that had already flown in Mercury and/or Gemini and worked so long to make it possible for the moon missions.
Sorry Ernest. “…scratched the surface…” is not a pun. (Pedantic pet peeve.)
Mark Harrigan is just angry like the other alarmists that the only scientist to walk on the moon is a climate skeptic. I think this really bugs them.
How is it possible to have a fourteen-word gish gallop?
He must think you are a genius.
he needs to change his moniker to @skid_mark