Real Climate Science

I’m going to be showing these maps regularly, to give a feel for just how much trouble Arctic alarmists are facing this month. Green indicates that ice extent actually increased in the Chukchi Sea yesterday.

John Boehner could shut down Obama’s dictatorship any time he wanted to. Boehner controls the purse strings, and/or he could initiate impeachment proceedings any time he wants to. He refuses to use either of his pimary tools, and also refuses to press forward with prosecuting Lois Lerner.

Instead he makes mindless, idle threats about a lawsuit. Obviously there is something very wrong going on. Boehner refuses to do his job.  Why?

The NOAA Climate Extremes Index (CEI) is the crown jewel of NOAA climate fraud.

The graph below is an EPA graph derived from CEI, which shows US summers much hotter now than the 1930’s, and shows that only half of the US was hot during the summer of 1936.

This graph is quite remarkable, because another EPA graph in the same document shows that heat waves were much more severe during the 1930s.

Heat waves in the 1930s remain the most severe heat waves in the U.S. historical record (see Figure 1). The spike in Figure 1 reflects extreme, persistent heat waves in the Great Plains region during a period known as the “Dust Bowl.”

High and Low Temperatures | Climate Change | US EPA

The fraudulent EPA graph (top) is based on this garbage NOAA CEI data set, which shows the summer of 2012 as hot as the summer of 1936.

www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/cei/dk-step1.06-08.results

So how bad is the fraud? Worse than you can possibly imagine. The percentage of US maximum temperature readings over 100 degrees in 1936 was more than double 2012 – which didn’t even rank in the top 10.

The average maximum summer temperature in 2012 didn’t rank in the top ten, and was almost 1.5C cooler than 1936.

Further evidence of  the NOAA data fraud includes the original Weather Bureau maps  from the summer of 1936, which showed almost the entire US far above normal temperature – not 50% as NOAA now claims in their CEI data.

Index of /rescue/mwr/064

Temperatures in 1936 were “over 100 degrees throughout a large part of the nation”

http://news.google.com/newspapers

The only question is – is this criminal incompetence, or due to criminal intent?

Where do they find these morons at?

July 12, 2014 at 4:41 pm

I apologize for forcing NASA to do this 15 years ago, via my evil retroactive witchcraft.

Now that Hillary and Kerry have left every country they visited in complete shambles, Democrats hope to give Hillary to opportunity to do the same to the US.

The propagandists running the US government are really pushing their luck with this one. The EPA claims that the past winter wasn’t cold in the US.

High and Low Temperatures | Climate Change | US EPA

The Commerce Department says that contraction of the economy was due to the unusually cold winter, which the EPA says didn’t occur.

The U.S. economy contracted much more than previously thought during the first quarter of this year, revised estimates show. Rather than the 1 percent growth the Commerce Department reported last month, gross domestic product fell by 2.9 percent, the worst performance in five years. That brings total growth down by 3 percent since the government first reported its estimates in April. ….  the economy’s woes have been largely blamed on an unusually cold winter

U.S. Economy Contracted Almost 3 Percent in First Quarter – NBC News.com

Nobel Peace Prize winner President Obama has destroyed all credibility of the US and the US government.

Temperatures in the Arctic Basin have been cold again this summer, and there is little melting occurring. The map below shows ice loss from July 10 to July 11 in red.

There are only a few weeks left to the melt season, which is shaping up to be a complete disaster for people who make their living promoting fear about the Arctic.

In direct contrast to the deliberate misinformation being spread by Heidi Cullen’s Climate Central, Summer afternoons used to be much hotter in the US.

USHCN raw station data shows an average of 7 degrees/century cooling since 1998, while their fabricated (infilled) data shows almost no cooling. The fabricated data is data which has no underlying station data, and is manufactured by NOAA.

The next graph shows the divergence between the fabricated data, and the actual measured data. They are diverging at 6.5 degrees/century

Astonishingly, a number of well known scientists have been interviewed by the press saying that this is all good, and that my complaints should be ignored.

It defies explanation that USHCN would do this, and even more astonishing that anyone defends this practice of data tampering which destroys any meaning in the temperature record, and makes it both useless and destructive to science.

After infilling, homogenization and adjusting for goalie differences, NCDC has determined that the US team has easily won in Brazil.

The US team has also been advised that in order to speed their return back through US immigration, they should leave all their documentation behind. This will fast track them across the border.