Most US States Had Their Hottest Year Prior To 1970
http://realclimatescience.com/2010/11/06/most-us-states-had-their-hottest-year-prior-to-1970/
Thermometer Magic
http://realclimatescience.com/2010/09/25/thermometer-magic/
NOAA : Long Term Sea Level Rise Is Six Inches Per Century
http://realclimatescience.com/2010/09/25/thermometer-magic/
Hiding The Decline In Washington DC
http://realclimatescience.com/2010/11/04/hiding-the-decline-in-washington-dc/
Drowning The Sea Level/Global Warming Relationship Myth
http://realclimatescience.com/2010/10/25/drowning-the-sea-levelglobal-warming-relationship-myth/
Sea Level Challenge
Calling all reality deniers, who live inside computer models. Here is your chance to prove that sea level is rising rapidly.
http://realclimatescience.com/2010/10/30/sea-level-challenge/
Sea Level Data Shatters The Hype
http://realclimatescience.com/2010/10/25/sea-level-data-shatters-the-hype/
They Can’t Model Clouds, They Can’t Model Feedback, But They Can Forecast The Temperature In 90 Years Within A Tenth Of A Degree
US Thermometer Readings Show Cooling Since 1895 – Before Adjustments
The Safe Side Of 350
http://realclimatescience.com/2010/11/08/the-safe-side-of-350/
Drowning The Sea Level/Global Warming Relationship Myth
One of the most often stated pieces of drivel from the climate science community, is that sea level rise is an indication of warming temperatures. In fact, there is no such correlation.
The graph below overlays global temperatures with global sea level. For the last 8,000 years, sea level has been rising while temperatures have been falling.
We are in the grip of madness…..the Global warming fanatics are either trying to distract the population while they effect changes to laws and the Constitution, or they are trying to drive the population into hysteria over a non existant crisis so they effect those changes. God deliver us from the madness of power before its too late.
True…
While you wait for “God” to deliver you I’m going to make some changes in the way I live to try and help the situation. But go ahead and sit with your bible. We will see who makes a difference.
Moron alert
And not Fascism is back live and well in the USA, I never as a young man thought it could happen here, then with Obama-Nation, it became clear to me..
Steve,
Didn’t know where else to post this…
Ijust noticed that the “Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)” links under your stories are linking to other blogs.
For example, in your post “California Decides To Raise Unemployment, Increase Fuel Costs For The Poor” the related posts links go to:
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2010/10/23/california-proposition-23/
http://goalpath.wordpress.com/2009/12/04/given-its-budget-woes-and-unemployment-rate-can-california-continue-to-lead-the-nation-in-innovation-and-technology/
http://greenkiosk.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/the-new-california-green-gold-rush/
http://northcoastsolarstocks.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/california-green-push-to-staunch-job-losses/
Those links usually go to related posts on your blog only. You might want to check with WordPress… Just thought you should know.
Keep up the great work!
Robb
Dr Roy Spencer has published the December numbers….
Dec. 2010 UAH Global Temperature Update: +0.18 deg. C
http://www.drroyspencer.com/2011/01/dec-2010-uah-global-temperature-update-0-18-deg-c/
Sir. as one who disbelieves the AGW narrative in re “global warming” (as you too must), I would like to refer to the use of the word “denier” in your blog handle. Although many in the science reality camp have chosen to wear this infamous badge that has been fastened on them in a manner so similar to the yellow star of “Juden” fastened on them by the fascists in the false belief that our realism will change the narrative of the AGW believers.
The obvious analogy to “Holocaust deniers” with the use of this label only serves the self serving smug holier than thou believers through this transference mechanisms. I implore all “real science” participants who are attempting to bring truth to Science to forgo this label. The “Borg” have assimilated you when you wear it.
Unless and until we can measure the CO2 content throughout the atmosphere as well as the temperature of the earth’s land mass, sea and atmosphere this idea of GW
especially as related to CO 2, becomes no more than science fiction beneath
and unworthy of Asimov or even Star Trek.
Here is something no one that I have read about has even considered. Has the average height of the tropopause changed? Is anyone even collecting that data. With today’s very high flying jets that number can be recorded and logged quite often in the
area of many times per hour. In fact pilots could be asked to” trop-out” as part of any flight plan that takes them over some planned high altitude and then return to their cruising altitude.
The atmosphere is like a balloon and its temperature change per thousand feet up is bounded by the tropopause (The tropopause is the atmospheric boundary between the troposphere and the stratosphere. Going upward from the surface, it is the point where air ceases to cool with height,)-hence its name. If we were to see this balloon
expanding i.e. world tropopause increasing in altitude year over year ,then we might have a concern about GW.
The present emphasis on CO2 is ridiculous but suits the purpose of the GW ers quite well. Since CO2 is a miniscule portion of the atmosphere (CO2 is a trace gas comprising 0.039% of the
atmosphere) . Also it is very hard to measure consistently throughout the whole of
the atmosphere thereby providing great camouflage to the GW proponents. It also
ascribes enormous leverage to an element that is found in very small quantities in the earth’s gas inventory. Therefore if you fudge that figure just a few 100’s of a % and base a model on that you can really “model” some wild BS or chicken crap as Boehner would say.
John F Dowd
PO Box 71
44 Tower Road
Kittery Point, ME 03905
207-438-0414
And what about saturation levels (you make some great points here BTW), but c02 cannot keep increasing in the upper atmosphere beyond a saturation point – I believe this is why we have seen HUGE c02 levels through ICE ages, and huge warming trends…(all natural)…
this might get a laugh . . .
climate change sceptics destroy evidence of global warming in Austria
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12672756
Real Science? Really? I don’t see much of either here. “Unbelievable Ignorance” would be a much better name for the site.
You have convinced me with your very detailed and specific arguments.
It wouldn’t make any difference if he posted 1000 pages of peer reviewed science. I’ve seen just enough of your blog to recognize a motivated denier. Ideology or cash? That’s the only question.
No cash, I just like to clean up the trash.
I am an engineer by trade… years of hard facts, measurements, and pure science and part art of engineering… (educated guessing). I have been saying the same things you are saying on this webpage for years and years and been getting laughed at by these moron GW ers for as long.
Years ago I was a crewmember on the USS Pargo (SSN-650) a fast attack nuclear submarine. We made the first ever purely scientific ice expedition taking civilian scientists to the arctic and the pole for their own experiments and studies. I trekked up to 28 miles over the ice to aid these scientists in setting up their sensors. We surfaced in a polynia area that was about one full acre of open water!!! This was in 1991.
This has happened and has been documented as early as when Admiral Byrd made it to the North Pole first. Today it is huge news. The short news cycle, plus the availability of new technology giving us instant access to street level views from satelites, and access to incredible satelite technology that is capable of analyzing the make up of the atmosphere, and polution. This does not make for better analysis, it makes it available to the untrained to support their own beliefs and hype this information around the world at the speed of light.
Say it long enough and loud enough and to as many people as you can as many times as you can and it will be truth soon enough. Follow the money and behind GW’ing you will find GE, Westinghouse, Simmons, etc.. etc… all pushing environmentally friendly products. This is big business changing human culture.
Thank you for bring some sanity back to this whole process… what you say isn’t popular, but using their own technique of say it long enough, loud enough and to as many people as you can it will spread… and being the truth already well thats a bonus, isn’t it?
Temperature data has been altered for as long as we have monitored the data in the united states…
When we started the volunteer monitor program, people provided their own equipment originally, that introduced error, so the government provided the equipment and instructions for mounting it properly, thats where they stop,,, No monitoring of equipment, no auditing of results, and well only recently researchers found that an incredible amount of that data has been falsified, much of the equipment is installed wrong, (near air vents, in areas of lots of asphalt, concrete, in the wrong orientation, that equipment does not provide accurate results. Add to that the fact that people continue to report data despite not being present taking that data due to vacations, illness, work, etc
That data has been used as a baseline model to formulate the core arguement that the earth is warming.
Just way to much wrong with all of the GW arguements. What we need to do is design a monitoring program and begin again to monitor specifically for global temperature change, as well as many other facits of the environment, such as sea level, ice area, ozone levels, co2 levels etc. and the correlate that data at some future time. That may or may not confirm a hypothesis, but that is the only way to do this considering all the problems we currently have with the tripe that GW is!
Keep up the good work!!!
JE Pollaje
What’s wrong with these arguments?:
GHE warming predicts more warming at high latitudes.
GHE warming predicts more warming at night.
GHE warming predicts more warming in winter.
GHE warming predicts cooling and contraction of the stratosphere.
Other forcings predict the precise opposites.
All observations inre: the above are indicative of GHE warming. One weather station in the high Canadian Arctic shows a 10.7degF midwinter warming over several decades. Space agencies have had to recalculate the orbital decay rates of LEO satellites because the stratosphere has contracted several kilometers.
I’m an engineer, too, and I’ve noted an alarming tendency for other engineers to be science deniers. Engineers are even prominent among creationists. I think a little science background with precious little scientific method tends to create a high-end Dunning-Kreuger Effect.
Antarctica has been cooling for 30 years. Temperatures in the Arctic have been below normal every day for the last month.
and you believe a fraction of a degree….can predict a trend
……….moron
“One weather station in the high Canadian Arctic shows a 10.7degF midwinter warming over several decades.”
Would that be the station located at what is known as the “Garden Spot of the Arctic”?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka,_Nunavut
oooo- “high end” dunning krueger effect… so my illusory superiority complex comes from my brain, whereas your illusory superiority complex comes from a lower region… I maintained a “high end” regard for nearly all engineers over my many years, as they built nuclear plants, submarines, and other technological marvels. Most of them had a great understanding and grasp of physics, mathematics, etc. When I retired a few years back from the cubicle world wherein new hire engineers had all the common sense of a screen door on a submarine, my regard for engineering schools and the grasp of what science actually is was considerably less. I certainly wouldn’t have hired any to design a screen door, much less provide input on the AGW nonsense.
A form social madness has crept into our society since the 60’s. Partly driven by a neo socialist agenda and partly driven by a new utopianism of the hippy generation. Utopians believe irrationally that a ideal society can exist when in reality it can never exist. But instead of facing reality they dig themselves deeper into their fanatasies often with the help of drugs. They call this the inner self, the re-awakening, etc. Its really a form of arrested development, they never really reach adulthood. And when real adults(conservatives) try to correct their irrational thinking these adults become the hated enemy, because according to Liberals Santa Claus DOES exist and so does Global Warming.
Hi Steven,
I’ve been working with GHCN monthly data raw and adjusted that I’ve put into a mysql database. I sorted US stations by year to find the worst adjustments and the winner is GHCN/USHCN station …
427729 39.6847 -111.2047 2655.4 UT SCOFIELD-SKYLINE MINE 423896 —— —— +7
USHCN only includes data from 1984 forward, which is regularly cooled by a full 4+degrees C.
year id adj_max adj_min adj_avg
1984 42500427729 4.87583333 4.24166667 4.55666667
1985 42500427729 4.38909091 4.08454545 4.23636364
1986 42500427729 4.38416667 4.09166667 4.23750000
1987 42500427729 4.38416667 4.09166667 4.23833333
1988 42500427729 4.38416667 4.09166667 4.23750000
1989 42500427729 4.37272727 4.07090909 4.22181818
1990 42500427729 4.38416667 4.09166667 4.23833333
1991 42500427729 4.38416667 4.09166667 4.23666667
1992 42500427729 4.35125000 3.15125000 3.75125000
1993 42500427729 2.50916667 0.61166667 1.56000000
1994 42500427729 1.88416667 0.61166667 1.24833333
The full record for 427729 in GHCN gets adjusted by 6+ degrees C back in the 1920’s.
Here’s the top 10 adjustment winners.
id count(*) adj_max adj_min adj_avg
42500427729 983 4.55885046 4.70625636 4.63187182
42500201439 1241 2.47689766 2.51863014 2.49718775
42500480552 1289 3.18738557 1.11152056 2.14925524
42500154703 1346 0.70163447 3.36617385 2.03361070
42500026353 1198 2.77154424 0.86776294 1.81961603
42500331152 1225 1.95531429 1.60312653 1.77905306
42500458207 1375 1.61376000 1.71717091 1.66517091
42500143810 1402 1.92280314 1.33488588 1.62853780
42500105685 1090 -0.17715596 3.37363303 1.59788991
42500363526 948 1.07218354 2.11941983 1.59559072
Amazing. Bunch of criminals.
Yep. These people have no shame. I noticed that many of the most adjusted GHCN records also appear to be truncated in USHCN long after the record started reporting (missing the heat of the 30’s).
It’s a little cumbersome at the moment to check this at the moment. I think maybe loading the USHCN data and then comparing the station lists using sql would verify if this is a coincidence or an unpleasant theme.
If it’s all criminal deception, then why did a Koch sponsored study of supposed errors in the surface temp data end up reconfirming the original conclusions? Hmmm?
You mean the WORST BEST study that failed peer reveiw? 😆
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/29/why-the-best-papers-failed-to-pass-peer-review/
Hmmm? 😆
Here’s GHCN’s comparison for this station… Hiding nothing
ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/v3/products/stnplots/4/42500427729.gif
Seems to have disappeared? Maybe they are rebuilding the station plots?
Interesting new hourly data analysis
http://www.drroyspencer.com/2012/08/a-new-analysis-of-u-s-temperature-trends-since-1943/
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/09/20/climate-craziness-of-the-week-bizarre-appellation/#comments
The environmental madness never seems to recede. There will be some event that will finally put a bullet in it…but we cant predict that event and when it will occur. I pray soon.
I predict it will just get renamed to something else, and Nobel prizes and Oscar awards will propel it in perpetuity because logic does not seem to matter to enough people. But pithy blurbs and emotive appeals do.
Because sometimes you just got to know who to blame…
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/11/us/brothers-work-different-angles-in-taking-on-climate-change.html?_r=0
can anyone recommend a site, book, any resource appropriate for young kids (5-10) to educate them on the truth of global warming? too much propaganda in the schools and online, but I can’t find anything promoting the truth in a way young kids understand.
Sir- it is difficult to reply; As a non-credentialed science lover, and previous educator of science in the public school system (high schools) prior to 1989, I can only offer the following: This site, and WUWT by Anthony Watts both are, in the words of the AGW believers, “deniers”. The obvious connotation and wish to draw an analogy to the Holocaust deniers is unmistakable. I love Mr. Goddards quote from Richard Feynman at the top of this blog; today, the perversion of academic scientists and outright reality of careers lost, death threats, etc for any deviation from (as mentioned elsewhere) the corporate sponsored and politically enabled party line is totally unthinkable. Truth? The realists of this site and WUWT will admit they cannot explain all the reasons for how/ what our climate is or has been doing. They do however, in many places point to the truth: the actual data, the historical data all reveal that there is NO GLOBAL WARMING. But, the emperors’ naked butt will not be revealed until one of our children points it out- So: Good on you, Mate, for trying to educate your children outside the public indoctrination system!
As an Engineer and professional curmudgeon, you are hoping for them to admit defeat? When it can no longer be denied, they will claim VICTORY! LOOK we saw it and we fixed it. See we were right all along you awful deniers, if it wasnt for us and our economy destroying stupidity, why you would all be sweaty and swimming.
i’ve decided to write my own childrens’ book starring a penguin and a polar bear. once i find an illustrator i will self publish online. I read the text/draft to my 6 year old and she loved it. she also clearly saw the idiocy of global warming.
IOW, you have the critical thinking skills of a six year old child.
So where does that leave you?
Another “97 percenter” who believes the “science is settled“. 😆
Unbelievably ignorant. That is my impression of your site and a vast majority of your followers.
In other words, you are an idiot.
Come and join us at Peakprosperity. We have a tame climatologist.
http://www.peakprosperity.com/forum/definitive-global-climate-change-aka-global-warming-thread-general-discussion-and-questions/71
Why do you misrepresent Dr. Cochrane as a climatologist? In his own words…
I am a research scientist and professor with an environmental engineering degree from MIT and a doctorate in ecology from Penn State.
From his bio page…
He holds a Ph.D. in Ecology from Pennsylvania State University and a S.B. in Environmental Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
https://globalmonitoring.sdstate.edu/content/cochrane-mark
I scanned the comments and see nothing worth repeating, he is just another warmist whose salary deopends on alarmism.
He is currently the principle investigator of over $3.7 million in externally funded research grants…
He is a salesman.