Lake Powell is nineteen feet below 2001 water levels, and gaining almost one foot per day (relative to 2001.) This is due to the declining spring snowpack and early melt which the experts have been telling us about.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Worst March Drought On Record
- Robertvd on Worst March Drought On Record
- Bob G on Worst March Drought On Record
- GW on The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Don B on Worst March Drought On Record
- Ulric Lyons on Worst March Drought On Record
- conrad ziefle on The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- conrad ziefle on The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- D. Boss on The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Bob G on The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
Must be careful as not to invoke the angry doughtflood gods.
I have no idea what this means in the greater scope of things
Andy
It means the modelers don’t know what they are doing. They form the basis of the entire scam.
It’s the aerosholes
No, it means that the levels fluctuate, as everyone knows they will. Models calculate long-term trends, not year-to-year fluctuations.
Yes, but what did the folks at the University of Colorado say after corrective adjustments were made? Hmmm?