Lake Powell is nineteen feet below 2001 water levels, and gaining almost one foot per day (relative to 2001.) This is due to the declining spring snowpack and early melt which the experts have been telling us about.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Truth Or Consequences
- US Climate Trend Maps
- Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Cattle And The Climate
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Truth Or Consequences
- Weylan McAnally on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- conrad ziefle on Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- Bob G on You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Ivan G Wainwright on You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- conrad ziefle on You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Bob G on You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Gordon Vigurs on You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- arn on Cattle And The Climate
- Bob G on Cattle And The Climate
Must be careful as not to invoke the angry doughtflood gods.
I have no idea what this means in the greater scope of things
Andy
It means the modelers don’t know what they are doing. They form the basis of the entire scam.
It’s the aerosholes
No, it means that the levels fluctuate, as everyone knows they will. Models calculate long-term trends, not year-to-year fluctuations.
Yes, but what did the folks at the University of Colorado say after corrective adjustments were made? Hmmm?