Climate scientists are much smarter now, and know that bad weather is caused by melted ice. It used to be caused by unmelted ice.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Vandalism At The Reflecting Pool
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Truth Or Consequences
- US Climate Trend Maps
- Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Cattle And The Climate
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
Recent Comments
- Chuck on Truth Or Consequences
- Gerald Machnee on Fifty Years Ago Today
- conrad ziefle on Fifty Years Ago Today
- Bob G on Truth Or Consequences
- Weylan McAnally on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- conrad ziefle on Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- Bob G on You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Ivan G Wainwright on You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- conrad ziefle on You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Bob G on You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
Which climatologists?
Apparently there wasn’t any consensus about the threat of an oncoming ice-age, so this group must have been a minority.. you know, similar to the odd looney like Schneider who wasn’t a respected or prominent scientist, and who appeared on a well known TV show aired around the world.
Oh, and Lamb.. such an obscure figure, really; like Hansen is these days.
There’s no consensus today on any portion of AGW either.
Steve, none of this happened. William Connelly said so. The fact that he’s a green party political activist is irrelevant. 😉
And the mighty intellect of David Appell concurs with Mr Connelly, so that settles it…
The experiment described in 1975 is being performed.
http://notrickszone.com/2012/08/27/arctic-ice-loss-temperature-or-soot/
On the one side we have historical winter temperatures. Increases icepack.
On the other side we have always had storms, wind, currents and summer temperatures. Decreases ice
Whats new?
Soot decreases ice.
Icebreakers decrease ice. Picture ceramic tile with no grout. Ice becomes weak and unstable, more susceptible to wind and currents, which cause direct ice-ice collision and frictional sideswipes.
Its not a fair fight.
Let’s put “climatology” into the same category as phrenology and eugenics, and see it for the pseudo-science that it is, or has at least become.