Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- First Tracks In The Snow
- UK Green Energy Record
- UN Is Upset
- “Fascist Salute”
- Record Warmth Of January 1906
- Heat Trapping Difficulties
- Visitech – Data Made Simple – Antarctic Sea Ice
- Visitech – Data Made Simple
- California Governor Refused Firefighting Help
- Internet For Drowned Island
- A Toast To President Trump
- 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- Green Energy Progress
- Scientists Concerned
- New Data Tampering By NOAA
- Magical Thermometers
- Responsive Government In California
- Collapse Of The Antarctic Sea Ice Scam
- NPR : Cold And Snow Caused By Global Warming
- Snow Forecast In All 53 States
- 97% Consensus
- “Melting ice reveals millennia-old forest buried in the Rocky mountains”
- America Burning
- Mediterranean Britain
- Californians Celebrate Annual Wildfire Tradition
Recent Comments
- Gamecock on UN Is Upset
- scott allen on UN Is Upset
- arn on “Fascist Salute”
- dm on UN Is Upset
- dm on UK Green Energy Record
- Francis Barnett on UK Green Energy Record
- Greg in NZ on Record Warmth Of January 1906
- Disillusioned on “Fascist Salute”
- Francis Barnett on “Fascist Salute”
- Yonason on “Fascist Salute”
Climate Genius Suggests That The Arctic Really May Be Ice-Free After All
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
It’s an illusion it didn’t melt because the ice is only 1mm thick.
It’s been ice-free since 2008, actually. The Koch Brothers sent giant refrigerators & huge fans up North to keep those rowers from reaching the pole!
KOCH BROTHERS!
The multi-year ice, record cold and absolutely normal climate conditions are hard facts to hide or even disguise and the neurotic warmista’s are headed for massive headaches, ridicule and tremendous self doubt.
I’m always amazed at what people can not find, when they don’t look.
The Arctic is ice-free…free of 15 of the 17 known types of ice, that is…
debauched and debased ice
So he’s admitting that they really never knew how much ice there was under “normal” conditions? Or is he admitting that during conditions of less ice cover that there could have actually been more total ice?
That self styled climate genius seems to believe that there is no correlation between ice extent and ice thickness.