Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- France And England To Defeat Russia
- COP29 Update
- Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- “Gender-responsive climate action”
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
Recent Comments
- Bill on France And England To Defeat Russia
- Mike Peinsipp on France And England To Defeat Russia
- Francis Barnett on COP29 Update
- Jack the Insider on COP29 Update
- Bill on HUD Climate Advisor
- arn on France And England To Defeat Russia
- Nicholas McGinley on COP29 Update
- Greg in NZ on COP29 Update
- conrad ziefle on France And England To Defeat Russia
- conrad ziefle on “Gender-responsive climate action”
Climate Genius Suggests That The Arctic Really May Be Ice-Free After All
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
It’s an illusion it didn’t melt because the ice is only 1mm thick.
It’s been ice-free since 2008, actually. The Koch Brothers sent giant refrigerators & huge fans up North to keep those rowers from reaching the pole!
KOCH BROTHERS!
The multi-year ice, record cold and absolutely normal climate conditions are hard facts to hide or even disguise and the neurotic warmista’s are headed for massive headaches, ridicule and tremendous self doubt.
I’m always amazed at what people can not find, when they don’t look.
The Arctic is ice-free…free of 15 of the 17 known types of ice, that is…
debauched and debased ice
So he’s admitting that they really never knew how much ice there was under “normal” conditions? Or is he admitting that during conditions of less ice cover that there could have actually been more total ice?
That self styled climate genius seems to believe that there is no correlation between ice extent and ice thickness.