Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
Recent Comments
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Jack the Insider on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
It’s an illusion it didn’t melt because the ice is only 1mm thick.
It’s been ice-free since 2008, actually. The Koch Brothers sent giant refrigerators & huge fans up North to keep those rowers from reaching the pole!
KOCH BROTHERS!
The multi-year ice, record cold and absolutely normal climate conditions are hard facts to hide or even disguise and the neurotic warmista’s are headed for massive headaches, ridicule and tremendous self doubt.
I’m always amazed at what people can not find, when they don’t look.
The Arctic is ice-free…free of 15 of the 17 known types of ice, that is…
debauched and debased ice
So he’s admitting that they really never knew how much ice there was under “normal” conditions? Or is he admitting that during conditions of less ice cover that there could have actually been more total ice?
That self styled climate genius seems to believe that there is no correlation between ice extent and ice thickness.