Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- Bob G on CO2²
- Bob G on CO2²
- conrad ziefle on CO2²
- arn on CO2²
- conrad ziefle on CO2²
- ThurmanZhou on CO2²
- Gordon Vigurs on CO2²
It’s an illusion it didn’t melt because the ice is only 1mm thick.
It’s been ice-free since 2008, actually. The Koch Brothers sent giant refrigerators & huge fans up North to keep those rowers from reaching the pole!
KOCH BROTHERS!
The multi-year ice, record cold and absolutely normal climate conditions are hard facts to hide or even disguise and the neurotic warmista’s are headed for massive headaches, ridicule and tremendous self doubt.
I’m always amazed at what people can not find, when they don’t look.
The Arctic is ice-free…free of 15 of the 17 known types of ice, that is…
debauched and debased ice
So he’s admitting that they really never knew how much ice there was under “normal” conditions? Or is he admitting that during conditions of less ice cover that there could have actually been more total ice?
That self styled climate genius seems to believe that there is no correlation between ice extent and ice thickness.