Data going back to 1866.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- MLH on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on Perfect Correlation
- Jack the Insider on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
Correlation between lunatic NSA mass spying and the massive loss of orders of American IT industry and defense industry, although graph is still underway.
http://freebeacon.com/boeing-loses-4-5b-contract-with-brazil-nsa-leaks-cited/#
This country is run into the ground by the current clique of idiots in charge and theur clueless helpers.
unrelated, but you may be interested in this about areans and wind turbines.:
http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/01/16/p-e-i-arenas-say-their-new-wind-turbines-an-expensive-burden-want-them-removed/
John M Reynolds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TGbfyPzcLo
No correlation at all. Interesting.
Old Jedi Mind Trick
2/3 of readings above 120 spots have positive temperature anomalies.
2/3 of readings below 100 spots have negative temperature anomalies.
Odds of that being a coincidence are close to zero.
Might be so. Still think correlation is much weaker than expected. Never seen that plot before, by the way.
I wonder if the unadjusted numbers do any better
I’d be curious what the relationship is when you “lag” the temperature by a few years. That is, how does the data look when you compare sunspot count in Year X with temperature in Year X + Y?