The frequency of 100 degree days in the US peaked just below 310 PPM CO2, and has been declining as CO2 has increased. There is absolutely no correlation between hot weather and increasing CO2.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Mission Accomplished
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
Not disputing but global numbers are where the argument has to be made, IMHO. And those numbers look good too.
There aren’t any accurate global numbers from the 1930s. The US data is by far the best in the world.
So where do the “global numbers come from? Mainly from the USA!
Data records by latitude: http://i34.tinypic.com/2naty6c.png
Back in 2010 E.M. Smith, Verity Jones and Kevin in the UK looked at The ‘Station drop out’ problem Thise article has graphs showing where the remaining data stations are located after the Climastrologists dropped a lot of stations to artificially increase the temperature
Pay close attention to this graph showing most records are from North and Central America especially after around 1990 link
And then look at the breakdown of Raw data stations – North and Central America:
link
Those graphics show that MOST of the Raw data stations are in the USA!
So Steve is really not off base looking at what is happening in the USA since that is where the majority of the data comes from.
“Pay close attention to this graph”…
I love it.
Even more so that the “Warmists” will NEVER get it. They live to die for AGW. Not rational.
Steve,
See if you can get this raw data. Observations by the same person for 84 years!
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/07/23/i-wonder-how-this-dedicated-weather-observer-feels-about-having-his-readings-adjusted-by-ncdc/