The frequency of 100 degree days in the US peaked just below 310 PPM CO2, and has been declining as CO2 has increased. There is absolutely no correlation between hot weather and increasing CO2.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
Recent Comments
- Terry Shipman on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- JohnFrancis on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Louis Hooffstetter on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Billyjack on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- arn on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Robertvd on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Bob G on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
Not disputing but global numbers are where the argument has to be made, IMHO. And those numbers look good too.
There aren’t any accurate global numbers from the 1930s. The US data is by far the best in the world.
So where do the “global numbers come from? Mainly from the USA!
Data records by latitude: http://i34.tinypic.com/2naty6c.png
Back in 2010 E.M. Smith, Verity Jones and Kevin in the UK looked at The ‘Station drop out’ problem Thise article has graphs showing where the remaining data stations are located after the Climastrologists dropped a lot of stations to artificially increase the temperature
Pay close attention to this graph showing most records are from North and Central America especially after around 1990 link
And then look at the breakdown of Raw data stations – North and Central America:
link
Those graphics show that MOST of the Raw data stations are in the USA!
So Steve is really not off base looking at what is happening in the USA since that is where the majority of the data comes from.
“Pay close attention to this graph”…
I love it.
Even more so that the “Warmists” will NEVER get it. They live to die for AGW. Not rational.
Steve,
See if you can get this raw data. Observations by the same person for 84 years!
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/07/23/i-wonder-how-this-dedicated-weather-observer-feels-about-having-his-readings-adjusted-by-ncdc/