The frequency of 100 degree days in the US peaked just below 310 PPM CO2, and has been declining as CO2 has increased. There is absolutely no correlation between hot weather and increasing CO2.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- First Tracks In The Snow
- UK Green Energy Record
- UN Is Upset
- “Fascist Salute”
- Record Warmth Of January 1906
- Heat Trapping Difficulties
- Visitech – Data Made Simple – Antarctic Sea Ice
- Visitech – Data Made Simple
- California Governor Refused Firefighting Help
- Internet For Drowned Island
- A Toast To President Trump
- 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- Green Energy Progress
- Scientists Concerned
- New Data Tampering By NOAA
- Magical Thermometers
- Responsive Government In California
- Collapse Of The Antarctic Sea Ice Scam
- NPR : Cold And Snow Caused By Global Warming
- Snow Forecast In All 53 States
- 97% Consensus
- “Melting ice reveals millennia-old forest buried in the Rocky mountains”
- America Burning
- Mediterranean Britain
- Californians Celebrate Annual Wildfire Tradition
Recent Comments
- Brian G Valentine on UK Green Energy Record
- arn on UK Green Energy Record
- Peter Carroll on “Fascist Salute”
- James Snook on UK Green Energy Record
- Brian G Valentine on UK Green Energy Record
- arn on UK Green Energy Record
- Gamecock on “Fascist Salute”
- Bob G on First Tracks In The Snow
- Brian G Valentine on UK Green Energy Record
- Brian G valentine on First Tracks In The Snow
Not disputing but global numbers are where the argument has to be made, IMHO. And those numbers look good too.
There aren’t any accurate global numbers from the 1930s. The US data is by far the best in the world.
So where do the “global numbers come from? Mainly from the USA!
Data records by latitude: http://i34.tinypic.com/2naty6c.png
Back in 2010 E.M. Smith, Verity Jones and Kevin in the UK looked at The ‘Station drop out’ problem Thise article has graphs showing where the remaining data stations are located after the Climastrologists dropped a lot of stations to artificially increase the temperature
Pay close attention to this graph showing most records are from North and Central America especially after around 1990 link
And then look at the breakdown of Raw data stations – North and Central America:
link
Those graphics show that MOST of the Raw data stations are in the USA!
So Steve is really not off base looking at what is happening in the USA since that is where the majority of the data comes from.
“Pay close attention to this graph”…
I love it.
Even more so that the “Warmists” will NEVER get it. They live to die for AGW. Not rational.
Steve,
See if you can get this raw data. Observations by the same person for 84 years!
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/07/23/i-wonder-how-this-dedicated-weather-observer-feels-about-having-his-readings-adjusted-by-ncdc/