Several people have asked me this. The most likely answer is that people in warmer climates preferred to take readings in the morning, and people in colder climates preferred to take readings in the afternoon.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- John Francis on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
The interesting thing is: There is a 2 deg F difference. So given the magnitude of the delta how can various outfits report temperature difference of 2/10 of a deg?
Suppose the morning stations are further south on average?
Morning, midnight, afternoon or evening, it doesn’t matter. There is nothing in the world that can ever take away from 1936! Like average high temperatures during July 1936 being 20 degrees hotter than 2014.
Somebody got the colours reversed, or it there was a shortage of mad dogs and Englishmen willing to go out in the afternoon sun?