Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Cheering Crowds
- GW on Cheering Crowds
- Bob G on Cheering Crowds
- GW on Cheering Crowds
- Bob G on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Bob G on Cheering Crowds
- GW on Cheering Crowds
- Gordon Vigurs on Cheering Crowds
- Robertvd on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Bob G on Cheering Crowds
18 Months Since Experts Predicted Global Warming Would Make California Wet
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
When will they learn? If a ‘scientist’ is making a climate prediction based upon a model, walk away, do not print. Climate models are worthless at predictions. A blindfolded monkey with darts would be more scientific, and would actually be right some of the time.
Hows about us regular folk just negate or invert every prediction made by the AGW folk?
No need, nature is already doing just that.
The key words are “should be assessed” which in plain English means send us more money for our next study.
I suspect that those fantasy computer generated models are more likely to get most researchers “hot and bothered”. Those researchers spend waaaaay to much time ogling their fantasy models.
Oh wait, we’re not talking about scantily clad animations?
Never mind. Carry on,.
See, this is where you deniers just don’t understand the science. They meant wet in the sexual connotation…
There’s probably a pretty good reason that there’s a desert in southern California for thousands of years. Sure there are frequent droughts, which would go unnoticed if the population of the state had not quadrupled in the past 50 years.
and THAT’S the bottom line. Too many people and too much irrigation to be supported by the natural state of that relatively arid land.
Unless you add nuclear power and salt water desalination plants.
Their models only missed by “that much” – Maxwell