Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- Mike on NPR Climate Experts
- Mike on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- mwhite on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
18 Months Since Experts Predicted Global Warming Would Make California Wet
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
When will they learn? If a ‘scientist’ is making a climate prediction based upon a model, walk away, do not print. Climate models are worthless at predictions. A blindfolded monkey with darts would be more scientific, and would actually be right some of the time.
Hows about us regular folk just negate or invert every prediction made by the AGW folk?
No need, nature is already doing just that.
The key words are “should be assessed” which in plain English means send us more money for our next study.
I suspect that those fantasy computer generated models are more likely to get most researchers “hot and bothered”. Those researchers spend waaaaay to much time ogling their fantasy models.
Oh wait, we’re not talking about scantily clad animations?
Never mind. Carry on,.
See, this is where you deniers just don’t understand the science. They meant wet in the sexual connotation…
There’s probably a pretty good reason that there’s a desert in southern California for thousands of years. Sure there are frequent droughts, which would go unnoticed if the population of the state had not quadrupled in the past 50 years.
and THAT’S the bottom line. Too many people and too much irrigation to be supported by the natural state of that relatively arid land.
Unless you add nuclear power and salt water desalination plants.
Their models only missed by “that much” – Maxwell