Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
Recent Comments
- Jack the Insider on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- conrad ziefle on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Robertvd on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Robertvd on 65 Years Of Progress!
18 Months Since Experts Predicted Global Warming Would Make California Wet
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
When will they learn? If a ‘scientist’ is making a climate prediction based upon a model, walk away, do not print. Climate models are worthless at predictions. A blindfolded monkey with darts would be more scientific, and would actually be right some of the time.
Hows about us regular folk just negate or invert every prediction made by the AGW folk?
No need, nature is already doing just that.
The key words are “should be assessed” which in plain English means send us more money for our next study.
I suspect that those fantasy computer generated models are more likely to get most researchers “hot and bothered”. Those researchers spend waaaaay to much time ogling their fantasy models.
Oh wait, we’re not talking about scantily clad animations?
Never mind. Carry on,.
See, this is where you deniers just don’t understand the science. They meant wet in the sexual connotation…
There’s probably a pretty good reason that there’s a desert in southern California for thousands of years. Sure there are frequent droughts, which would go unnoticed if the population of the state had not quadrupled in the past 50 years.
and THAT’S the bottom line. Too many people and too much irrigation to be supported by the natural state of that relatively arid land.
Unless you add nuclear power and salt water desalination plants.
Their models only missed by “that much” – Maxwell