In 1958, the New York Times reported 50 percent loss of glacial and sea ice volume, and said “brilliant research” indicated the disappearing ice was going to cause a new ice age.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
- Trained Not To Learn
- Protecting Endangered Species
- Record Climate Cynicism
- Record Cynicism
- The Latest In Climate Science Rhetoric
- Climate Desperation
- Artificial Stupidity
- Climate Obsession
- The Climate Empire Strikes Back
- Climate Scam Parrots
- “I’ve dealt with him before ”
- “I’ve dealt with him before.”
- “BE HONEST”
- Turn Out The Lights – The Party’s Over
- Net Zero In The UK
- Turn Out The Lights, The Party Is Over
- Michael Mann Again
- Over The Target
- Michael Mann’s Latest Research
- “an amazing documentary dismantling the climate change theory”
Recent Comments
- Bert on Ivy Echo Chamber
- Conrad Ziefle on Climate Homicide
- Conrad Ziefle on Climate Homicide
- Russell Cook on Climate Homicide
- czechlist on Ivy Echo Chamber
- Russell Cook on Climate Homicide
- Dan A Sinema on Climate Homicide
- MLH on Homophobic Gas
- Billyjack on Climate Homicide
- Laurie on Ivy Echo Chamber
That “brilliant new research” sounds like the theory proposed by Ewing & Donn – two of the top oceanographers of their time, which is outlined in much more detail here :
http://strongasanoxandnearlyassmart.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/scientists-predict-another-ice-age-is.html
It’s not the craziest theory I’ve ever read, far from it, in fact.
Proof of “settled science” carved in stone uncovered by our tireless blog master. This means that mainstream science hasn’t changed one bit since 1958.
Let’s review other scientific facts of that era–such as women being inferior to men, the dark races lacking intelligence and self-control, and how any sex other than approved reproductive sex was evil. And of course any culture other than the approved mainstream culture was degenerate. Glad to see science–the Religion–hasn’t changed any. Look at what the elite of the ages were doing with this scientific advice.
Can you say GENOCIDE?
Well, today the NYT noticed that it was cold outside and ice floes clog the East River and Hudson River flowing outside their windows.
Steve on one of your earlier posts you linked to an article by BBC Reporter Nigel Calder (The name was familiar but I couldn’t place him). I don’t know if you’re aware this but he co-authored The Chilling Stars
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/legacy/newsnight/2007/02/the_chilling_stars_by_calder_and_svensmark.html
This is his Guardian Obit.
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jul/01/nigel-calder
It seems to me he was a man after your own heart.
Ben that is an excellent link, the book make more sense then the CO2 caused it, theory
Though many theories seem to be extreme and, in time, they don’t match realiy, I think that it’s important to analyse the climatic revolution in the Arctic area and to see in which measure the oceans and the seas determine the climate. I suggest you to take a look here – http://www.arctic-warming.com/?page_id=17. There are many facts about the Arctic and about the warming phenomenon that happened here.