Since 1991, NCDC has cooled America’s temperature by almost 0.5C, yet they report temperatures within 0.01F. Junk science at its worst.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- czechlist on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
You would think that a science that was settled decades ago, would have settled on a data set before now.
Somebody please help me out as I am not a up on my math skills or the TOBS adjustment.
I went to the NCDC NOAA and read the article and saw the last chart which shows the difference between raw temperatures and final USHCN data. Which shows NOAA adding almost .6 of a degree since the 60’s. I would think that NOAA would be getting better at reading daily temperatures and get rid of the TOBS, but from the chart, it shows they are getting more inept at reading the raw temperature.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/ushcn/ushcn.html#QUAL
Exactly! One would think that younger and younger data made with newer and newer instraments wouldn’t require any correction, but in our brave new world, that doesn’t seem to be the case.
thanks for sharing the link; i was not aware that there are actually five adjustments made to raw data
Estimates for missing data are provided using a procedure similar to that used in the homogeneity adjustment scheme in step three. This fourth adjustment uses the debiased data from the third adjustment (SHAP) and fills in missing original data when needed (i.e. calculates estimated data) based on a “network” of the best correlated nearby stations.
the fifth being the adjustment for Urban Island affect — probably also adjusted upwards because NOAA knows that cities would be so much warmer if it weren’t for the air conditioners cooling the buildings during the Summer 🙂
Worst blizzard for years, the temperature got below zero.
http://www.britishpathe.com/video/worst-blizzard-for-years/query/wildcard
And then it warmed up.
http://www.britishpathe.com/video/ware-icebergs/query/wildcard
Steve. it can’t be TOBS because according to Zeke the changes should look like this graph ie no cooling by more than 0.05C prior to 1950
https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/figure-2.png