NASA US Data Tampering Has Reversed A Post-1940 Cooling Trend

In 1999, NASA’s top climatologists reported that the US was cooling, as greenhouse gases increased.


Empirical evidence does not lend much support to the notion that climate is headed precipitately toward more extreme heat and drought. The drought of 1999 covered a smaller area than the 1988 drought, when the Mississippi almost dried up. And 1988 was a temporary inconvenience as compared with repeated droughts during the 1930s “Dust Bowl” that caused an exodus from the prairies, as chronicled in Steinbeck’s Grapes of Wrath.

in the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country

NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate?

That didn’t suit the agenda, so they later tampered with the data to make the cooling disappear.


1999 version : 1999_Hansen_etal_1.pdf
2015 version: Fig.D.gif (525×438)

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to NASA US Data Tampering Has Reversed A Post-1940 Cooling Trend

  1. Mac says:

    I don’t understand what’s going on. Why isn’t this extremely big news everywhere? It’s obvious to me that the global warming lie is the worst example of globalist government corruption to ever hit civilization, and yet the newsmedia is completely silent about this. This is really getting scary.

    The climate change crowd looks more and more like the Manson Family every day.

    • Yes they are, Mac, but unfortunately, they still have a lot of moderates, and even a shockingly large number of conservatives, on their side. Getting people to see AND ACKNOWLEDGE the fraud is like pulling teeth without anaesthetic.

      It would become much easier if even one of the heavyweight lukewarmers would come clean, but seemingly, the fix is in with them, too.

      Europe is up to its ears in other problems right now, and congressional Republicans are being led by a bunch of FLAMING Leninists, so even the Liberty Caucus kind of has its hands full, right now.

      The following is something I’ve said before, but bears repeating. We have presidential candidates galore, but how many have you heard say they will prosecute any of this, let alone pull out all the stops and round up all of the criminals, and also go to civil court to claw back their pay?

      I have heard none, zero-point-zero. (Candidates, that is.)

      A lot the supporters of those candidates seem content to just assume their preferred candidate will eventually get around to doing things like this after the candidate is inaugurated. But is this insane. Any conservative voter should be able to see by now that, if candidate hasn’t target these criminals by this late date, that they are not on our side on this issue and will never, ever do anything substantive about it. Even if certain candidates know the truth and sympathize with what we want, they clearly have no intention of challenging the Leninist powers that are calling the shots on this and other issues, unless their hand is forced by us, via strong and early coordinated action by us.

      Unless we have the guts to support ONLY those leaders who are aggressive before the election on this issue (that is to say, NONE of the current crop), we will never be able to force the warmists from power. And make no mistake, the warmists must be forced from power via numerous citizen lawsuits. They will NEVER go willingly, NO MATTER WHAT … NO MATTER HOW ANGRY OR LOUD WE ARE IN CRITICIZING THEM.

      This is in our hands — yours and mine — and not those of any candidate, judge, prosecutor, police, or government civil attorney. All of those others have already demonstrated their lack of intent to act. WHAT MORE EVIDENCE DO WE NEED, in order to know this is true?

      As far as I can see, everyone on our side with the exception of myself and possibly one other who I won’t name right now, is STILL playing by Queensberry rules. Good fortune with that in the coming years, my neighbors, because we’re sure gonna need it! (I.e., the Queensberry rules are not gonna cut the mustard this time!)

      — RT

  2. CLS says:

    I am a skeptic of global warming but in reading the 1999 NOAA article, this statement
    caught my eye.

    “Indeed, in the U.S. the warmest decade was the 1930s and the warmest year was 1934. Global temperature, in contrast, had passed 1930s values by 1980 and the world has warmed at a remarkable rate over the last 25 years.”

    It is not U.S. warming. It is global warming and the rest of the world has warmed more and more quickly than the US. To me, this says that there is global climate warming. I am still skeptical that it is man-made.

Leave a Reply to tonyheller Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *