Union Of Concerned Scientists Grants Earth Another Reprieve

In 1970, our top scientists warned that the oceans would be dead , and America would run out of food and water before before 1980.

06 Oct 1970, Page 3 – Redlands Daily Facts at Newspapers.com

Still alive in 1992, the scientists granted Earth a reprieve and warned that we only had a decade or so.

No more than one or a few decades remain …

Union Of Concerned Scientists 1992

21 Nov 1992, 19 – Vidette-Messenger of Porter County at Newspapers.com

Fred Singer called them out on their BS in 1992.

20 Nov 1992, Page 33 – St. Louis Post-Dispatch at Newspapers.com

Now the scientists have granted Earth another reprieve and are back with their “second warning” saying exactly the same BS they were saying in 1970.

Global climate change sits atop the new letter’s list of planetary threats. Global average temperatures have risen by more than half a degree Celsius since 1992

Thousands of scientists issue bleak ‘second notice’ to humanity – The Washington Post

Other than natural variability from oceanic and volcanic cycles, there is no legitimate reason to believe Earth’s temperature has changed at all since 1992.

Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs

With a La Nina developing and lots of cold water in the Southern Hemisphere, troposphere temperatures should start dropping soon.

anomnight.11.13.2017.gif (1174×640)

As someone who grew up in the scientific community, I understand that many scientists consider themselves to be gods who control fate and destiny – when in fact they are simply civil servants seeking a secure source of funding. The problem is that many of them actually believe their own delusions.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

26 Responses to Union Of Concerned Scientists Grants Earth Another Reprieve

  1. gator69 says:

    So, globally, they have less than half the signatories of the Oregon petition which covers only one country.

    Impressive.

  2. TimA says:

    “As someone who grew up in the scientific community, I understand that many scientists consider themselves to be gods who control fate and destiny – when in fact they are simply civil servants seeking a secure source of funding. The problem is that many of them actually believe their own delusions.“
    ……My Dad was a nuclear physicist at Los Alamos who loved science, but finally quit because of those very things. His supervisor took credit for an innovative process my Dad discovered and shared with him…..my Dad confronted him about and the guy said….”pshaw it happens all the time get used to it!”…..government corrupts pure science and turns their employees into useful idiots!

    • Tom O says:

      For the record, when you work for anyone, be it government or private business, you don’t “own” what you create, it belongs to your employer, so yes, your dad had to get over it or go start his own business where his intellectual production would be his own product.

      Government doesn’t corrupt pure science anymore than does businesses or institutions. Scientists corrupt pure science because they see “ownership” in knowledge they discover, generally on someone else’s dime, and see it as an avenue to riches. They no longer see it as “a road to even higher understanding.” They have placed monetary value and “honors” on the pursuit of knowledge and that is what has corrupted science.

      • Steven Fraser says:

        Tom O: Your generalization is incorrect. Very often, credit for innovations is shared by individuals who did part of the work, as in a team patent.

        As to who ‘owns’ something created by an employee… that is subject to the terms of the employment contract.

  3. arn says:

    Modern Science is so great.
    I”ve survived all these catastrophies without even realising that they happened.

    (i’d really like to know how those dumb idiots feel who believed in every single fearporn BS they have been told throughout the past 5 decades and who still cry “tinfoil hat,conspiracy theorist,paranoid shizoid,climate denier”(these words are the “global apocalypse” equivalents of “global diversity” “bigot,racist,xenophob,nazis” )
    instead of realising that they are systematically being fooled for decades
    and though everything turned out to be a lie they still side with their masters loyal as a dog or the wife with her wifebeating husband.

    PS-
    this Dr Ehrlich co- wrote with Obamas Science Tzar John”i used to say global cooling will kill us all,now i say global warming will” Holdren the book “Ecoscience” about a global world of forced mass sterilization and
    forced mass abortions((This is so “chinese-communism”,isnt it?No surprise that so many
    leading non-chinese communist in China have been from USA/ New York
    just like Trotzky lived in New York before starting russian revolution.
    Therefore no surprise that Wall Street these days is moving jobs and money to china just as they “bless” other countries with wars.A gift that keeps on giving))

    • Tom O says:

      What will the snowflakes say? They will say in spite of the rest of us, their efforts have forestalled the death spiral, thus glorifying their sacrifice and redoubling their efforts.

      Put things in the proper perspective when it comes to population and climate. It doesn’t really take a rocket scientist to understand that we are exiting the interglacial. We haven’t dropped into an ice age yet, but we are working are way there, faster and faster.

      Nearly all of the technological population is in the northern hemisphere. We have been growing grain foods and shipping them to the tropical regions that are densely populated for decades. We have literally transformed their diet, and lifestyles. They used to live within the limits of the land, we have made it possible to live far beyond those limits, while keeping them as economically depressed as possible – perfect for willing slaves.

      When the next ice age comes – very soon – we will lose the use of the northern hemisphere. We can “fight” the ice age for a while by using up all of the available carbon based fuel, but in the end, the northern populations have to move south to survive. And realize when I say “we,” I am not talking about the so called “white racist,” I am talking about the elite of many colors.

      If you adequately dumb down the northern populations, trick them into giving up dependable, inexpensive energy, when the cold really starts to happen, the elite “soon to be rulers of the world” will move to their equatorial palaces, and the majority of the northern populations will die from starvation, sickness, and hypothermia.

      Meanwhile, the elite will have transferred sufficient “grain supplies” to get the willing slaves from the now starving equatorial populations, allowing the rest to do just that – starve to death, dropping the world population down to Ted Turners 750 million or so.

      If you open your mind and THINK, you will understand that what I just wrote has a belter than 95% chance of being the truth, and the world will have a one world government of the elite, overseers under them to insure that what is left of the human population will do their bidding, and the bulk of that 750 million will be subsistence slaves, and probably left as uneducated as possible.

      • Tom O says:

        It’s amazing how you can read and re-read a post multiple times and never see the typos until you read it after it posts. As you read you will see “are” for “our” and “betler” for better.

      • arn says:

        A pretty logical scenario,
        but i guess the chance of becoming true is at around 70% right now.

        As some new contenders entered the playing room-
        as evil Mr Putin or internet information flow.
        Therefore a certain elite can not afford to go all in
        with that 95% reduction plans without being exposed((the gorgia guidestones masterplan has to be watered down to keep it going))

        btw-the elite themselves are not really mixed as far as i can see.
        No matter where i look((be it the astors or rockefellers or rothschild and windsors(fake nam btw)
        or the new(er) kids on the block like gates,turner or zuckerberg,
        these guys do not mix with their beloved and uncriticizable
        blacks & muslims.
        In fact they do something completely different when outsiders step into their territories= remember what happened to lady diana when she started shagging with an elitist muslim?!

        In fact they stay among themselves or at best mix with east asians(=non muslim asians).
        but they do not touch the rest.
        And i’m pretty sure the elitist people of color are very well aware to be just superrich ,deplorable pawns of the anglosaxon elites
        and as soon as they are nor longer usefull for them they”ll get Husseined and Ghaddafied.

      • R. Shearer says:

        End of this interglacial will remove all objections to nuclear power and coal. At the very least self sufficient enclaves are possible. A bigger question is how much we could lessen impacts of the impending ice age globally.

  4. Kris Johanson says:

    Did Ehrlich ever do anything worthwhile, or did he just go around preaching death and waiving his Pharisaical finger at everyone else

  5. ARN “fearporn” Love it!
    Register it with Library of Congress for 31 bucks online.
    These fearporners should all perform the Ehrlich Maneuver & off themselves in the Gulf Stream to feed the fish, not fear.
    On a personal note publication date of October 6th 1970 was my first 23rd Birthday, just seriously celebrated my 2nd 35th…is Ehrlich upset?

  6. Steven Fraser says:

    Paul needs to have a ‘Climate Prediction Fail’ page like Hanson, Wadhams, and the other egregious prognosticators.

    And right up there, something like ‘The great things that nobody predicted to happen’

  7. Gerald Machnee says:

    Of the 15,000, how many are scientists and how many are politicians? They were sent by their gov because they drank the AGW kool-aid. Did they sign or was it a sort of vote? aka consensus. The conteny of that motion has little to do with climate.

  8. annieoakley says:

    I attended college in 1970 and it is all true. Professors idolized Erlich and Holdren. There were no ‘Studies’ at the time but those Commie professors found a way to get the propaganda into the classroom anyway.

  9. Ulric Lyons says:

    “Other than natural variability from oceanic and volcanic cycles, there is no legitimate reason to believe Earth’s temperature has changed at all since 1992.”

    About +0.3°C AMO driven warming, which is normal for the AMO to warm during a solar minimum.
    http://www.woodfortrees.org/graph/esrl-amo/from:1979/mean:7/plot/uah6/mean:7/plot/esrl-amo/from:1979/trend/plot/uah6/trend

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *