New Video : Bill Gates : “Reduce World Population With New Vaccines”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

36 Responses to New Video : Bill Gates : “Reduce World Population With New Vaccines”

  1. Disillusioned says:

    Yes, he said it. And he meant it. Regardless of how many unscrupulous apologists/useful idiots will try to spin it. Or try to ignore it.

  2. Liam says:

    Was it by accident that he said: ‘one of these numbers has to get to pretty near to zero’ while he had a picture of people on the screen?

  3. Carla says:

    Here in Holland it”s impossible to view the video on your website Tony.

  4. KevinPaul says:

    Bill Baloney, the moral retard. So immensely proud of the 60 million unborn useless eaters his father helped burn with the refuse or supplied to have science done to them.

    He expects at least 770,000 will die from adverse reactions to a global administering of his cov-2 vaccine. God only knows how many millions will get auto-immune diseases, Guillain-Barre syndrome, neuropathy etc.

    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/the-bill-gates-effect-whos-dtp-vaccine-kills-more-children-in-africa-than-the-diseases-it-targets/

  5. Al Shelton says:

    Total BS.
    Where is the proof that CO2 causes warming?
    As usual Gates-et-al continue to preach about disaster, based on the fraudulent AGW hypothesis.

  6. mwhite says:

    Casedemics

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FU3OibcindQ

    “our epidemic has waned – and has been replaced with an irrational, unscientific Casedemic.”

    • John Francis says:

      Yes.
      More tests, more cases.
      Means nothing.
      Test for common cold Covid, one of the flu strains, etc.. They’ll get many positives for active or antibodies.
      NATURE ABHORS A VACUUM.
      They’re everywhere people.

  7. Greg Raven says:

    Is this the same Bill Gates who has donated millions to keep people alive in Africa?

    • Tyrannosaurus Rex says:

      That’s exactly it. He means lowering child mortality. Everyone knows prosperous societies are made of families with few children growing up into productive adults rather than many children with a large fraction of them dying. I’m really disappointed in Tony this time. Coronavirus may be exploited by the politicians, but it isn’t some bioweapon.

      • Douglas P Connelly says:

        If it is not a BIOWEAPON !!! Then why did the Chines Communist party hide the true devastation of it for so long ?

      • Anthony Rose says:

        How do you reduce the population by 10-15% by lowering child mortality?

        • Tyrannosaurus Rex says:

          Have you seen how big these families can get? There’s gotta be at least half dozen kids in each one, and it’s very sad a good proportion of them may end up in an early grave, and from a (real) feminist perspective, it allows women to be more productive without worrying about their kids too much.

          • Vegieman says:

            Talk about someone being a white supremacist here. And you were the one who was concerned about wack jobs sidelining the real climate science movement? Your true colors are kinda dark. You seem to have quite a bit in common with Bill. I’m thinking the disappointment here is with you.

    • Douglas P Connelly says:

      the same Bill Gates the gave million to vaccine companies that he had holdings in and doubled his money. He is worth double what he was before his so called donations.

  8. Cathy says:

    He seems not to know about factors which complicate his misleading simplistic equation. One is that man-produced CO2 does not all become increased CO2 in the atmosphere because much of the carbon is taken out of it by vegetation and returned into the atmosphere as oxygen.
    Another point is that much of the increased CO2 in the atmosphere is not a cause of global warming, but rather an effect of global warming unrelated to man’s activities.
    It is also very likely that global warming, if it were to happen, would be more beneficial than harmful, overall, as was the warm period of the Middle Ages, when the farms of northern Europe and even Greenland were flourishing. It seems particularly puzzling that Canadians should fear global warming.

  9. annieoakley says:

    He lies so often and so easily. What a snake.

  10. Robert L Gipson says:

    Zbigniew Brzezinski: “To put it bluntly: in earlier times, it was easier to control one million people than to physically kill one million people; today, it is infinitely easier to kill one million people than to control one million people.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45xplvCVIb8

  11. Don B says:

    It is simply astounding how people like Gates can be so misinformed.

    Maybe after Trump is reelected he will expose the fake science. Wishful thinking?

  12. Cyril Wentzel says:

    He is so far away from recognising the beneficial assessment that “the more people, the better – at least if they are a free people”! That would be al least an Objectivist viewpoint. Not many others have such a kind of pro-human philosophy.
    And as far as his climate-assessment is concerned, since he’s no idiot, this must be a calculated position. That would be quite dishonest indeed. But then again, maybe he is a bit dumb or mentally lazy after all.
    Can we get him involved in a debate?

    • Tyrannosaurus Rex says:

      He’s doing exactly that. Everyone knows prosperous societies are made of families with few children growing up into productive adults rather than many children with a large fraction of them dying. I’m very disappointed in Tony this time. Coronavirus may be exploited by the politicians, but it isn’t some bioweapon.

  13. Richard A Reeves says:

    I would like to know what temperature data base results in the graph that Gates showed in this presentation. Perhaps Al Gore? Bill, The science Guy?

  14. My apologies. In the previous comments I failed to make note that the graph that was being shown was not of temperature but apparently of CO2 hello I’m not sure what the scale was as it went up to somewhere around 30 perhaps it was 30% from some baseline. But his speech was referring to temperature increase so hopefully he wasn’t really suggesting the temperature increase follows the CO2 line. I have listen to dr. Richard lindzen at MIT a world-renowned atmospheric scientist say there has been no discernible association with temperature of the earth atmosphere and CO2. Just what scientist is he interviewing?

  15. Fake name says:

    “This crazy psychopath needs to go away. Who the flip made bill gates the earths king of eugenics? Why don’t we just get rid of nations and let George Soros, the Rothschilds, bill gates, and the tech oligarchy rule the world? Is there even such thing as a sovereign nation anymore when they have all been subverted by the ruling elite class?”

    I commented this on your newest bill gates video and YouTube wouldn’t upload the comment. Kept scribing it minutes after posting.

  16. Graeme No.3 says:

    It is strange that all these AGW believers always assume that a rise in CO2 must raise the temperature, and lead to disaster. Did none of them ever check the historical or geological record?
    The world was warmer than now many times in the past, and for long periods while humans have been on the planet, and life has been easier. Yet they all think that we would be better off buried in snow and ice, as back in the Little Ice Age.

  17. Bruce John Bailey says:

    Yoiks , now I get where the anti-Vaxers are Coming from.

  18. Dirk Mullikin says:

    Unbelievable, he may know computer programing but his math is illogical. Sum of CO2 in the atmosphere is not relevant to the whole at current levels or if levels were twice as high. I would ask him what is photosynthesis? If he knows, then the next question would be, how would plants survive with zero CO2, and how would O2 breathing life survive without those plants? He exploits the usage of the word tonnage to imply a massive amount of the gas yet does not mention the overall amount of tonnage of all the gases in the atmosphere. Scare tactic using a play on words, so subtle, and convincing if one is ignorant of basic atmospheric chemistry.

  19. Bruce John Bailey says:

    Yoiks , now I get where the anti-Vaxers are Coming from. Bill is such a likeable nerd how could he have missed the compelling ice core evidence that UNEQUIVOCALLY proves that CO2 increases are subsequent to heat increases.

  20. What Gates is saying regarding the effect of CO2 on the earth’s atmosphere is complete, unmitigated, unscientific rubbish!

    What it particularly worrying is that you have an audience of affluent, reasonably-educated people sitting there passively, taking in his every word without critical thought.

    There are many ways of approaching the arguments surrounding AGW and showing that they are fallacious. Tony has been very effective focusing on temperature data and sea level data.

    Another approach, which you do not hear about nearly as often, is an examination of the “Carbon Cycle”.

    Much has been made in the past of the fact that humans are emitting Gigatonnes of Carbon Dioxide into the atmosphere. What the proponents of this theory of doom fail don’t seem to appreciate is that the biosphere is not a static entity. In every facet of the biosphere, where food becomes abundant, the entities that consume that food also become more abundant. So it is with CO2, the food of photosynthesising plants.

    If there is a higher concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere, the mechanism by which this CO2 is processed back into sugars, starches, cellulose and exoskeletons increases proportionally. And that is indeed the case. In terms of land-borne flora, according to NASA, the leaf area of plants on planet earth has increased by somewhere between 6 and 16%. In the seas, it is likely to be of the a similar quantum. That means the biosphere has increased its ability to consume CO2 by many times more than the total emissions (around 4% of the whole) of CO2 by humans. And yet atmospheric concentrations of CO2 continue to rise. Much of the CO2 which is causing this increased concentration MUST be coming from another source. That source. logically, is the oceans of the world.

  21. Robert says:

    Did he make a Freudian slip or was he really saying they want to reduce the world population by 10 to 15%?

  22. Wolf at the door says:

    In all honesty I think he is going ” off his rocket “

  23. Jeffk says:

    Why do educate idiots like Bill Gates (a software specialist) lose the ability to think for themselves? Any grade school student could understand the people who are “overpopulated” are NOT the ones causing pollution, including irrelevant CO2 emissions. It’s the people in developed countries with ZERO birth rates who require all those energy consuming “services” Bill Gates is so worried about.
    White Guilt is destroying the planet, not white supremacy. Vaccinating the poor has caused the population explosion, civil wars and fleeing refugees. It’s a Catch 22 to think birth control would reverse that trend, since fewer kids means more services, instead.

  24. Jeffk says:

    Why do educated idiots like Bill Gates (a software specialist) lose the ability to think for themselves? Any grade school student could understand the people who are “overpopulated” are NOT the ones causing pollution, including irrelevant CO2 emissions. It’s the people in developed countries with ZERO birth rates who require all those energy consuming “services” Bill Gates is so worried about.
    White Guilt is destroying the planet, not white supremacy. Vaccinating the poor has caused the population explosion, civil wars and fleeing refugees. It’s a Catch 22 to think birth control would reverse that trend, since fewer kids means more services (CO2), instead.

    • Tyrannosaurus Rex says:

      Someone’s a white supremacist here. You see these outsiders as invaders, but the truth is most of them are coming to your land or just a better life, and that makes your land richer in the end. Like the socialists, you see the world as limited and want the good stuff for you alone.

  25. Thad Kowalik says:

    “Near zero” CO2? Really? If so, then what would plants use to create oxygen? He is an absolute MORON with a nasty diabolical side.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *