New Video : Climate Collusion And Fraud (Part 1)

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to New Video : Climate Collusion And Fraud (Part 1)

  1. Jesper Holmberg says:

    From sweden, there is now music about CC (text is in English), and its from the skeptic side.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw0Ga7mPlLQ

    Thought this would amuse you Tony
    Lyrics
    La na na na La na na na
    Na na na
    Hey You
    Find out what’s really true
    Climate’s always changing
    Now and for evermore
    So be no ones fool
    To question is cool
    Oh yeah
    So be on the right team
    Don’t go with the mainstream
    Hey when searching the truth
    Changing your mind
    And be the one for the future
    Hey hey you can change your mind
    And find out what’s really going on
    Hey and we’ll be fine
    Don’t swim in the sea of confusion
    Hey hey so don’t be scared
    Doomsday is just an illusion
    Hey hey
    La na na na La na na na na
    La na na na La na na na
    Na na na na
    Hey you
    Find out what’s really true
    You’ll stay sane when you
    Start running your own brain
    So see the light
    The future is bright
    Oh yeah
    Tables are turning
    You got to keep learning
    Hey so take the fight
    Changing your mind
    And be the one for the future
    Hey hey you can change your mind
    And find out what’s really going on
    Hey we’ll be just fine
    Don’t swim in the sea of confusion
    Hey hey so don’t be scared
    Doomsday is just an illusion
    Hey hey
    La na na na La na na na na
    La na na na

  2. Jim Hunt says:

    “Snow White” slaps down climate sceptic Tony Heller:

    “You hold a number of misconceptions”

    • fred250 says:

      WOW, there really is SO MUCH SEA ICE up there isn’t there Jimbo.

      FAR MORE than for most of the last 10,000 years

      You cannot slap anyone down with your CLIMATE CHANGE DENIAL, Jimbo

      GET EDUCATED, fool !

      • KevinPaul says:

        To comment post a poorly labeled graph in response to the exposition of institutional fraud we have seen in that video, is ant-brained, an ant incapable of comprehending the boy with magnifying glass in hand.

    • spike55 says:

      “Snow White” slaps himself up-side the face in a comedy slap-fool post of deliberate and manic ignorance.

    • spike55 says:

      Hey Jimbo, you do know that current levels of Arctic sea ice are in the TOP 5-10% of the last 10,000 years, don’t you.

      Your post is meaningless unless viewed in this context.

    • KevinPaul says:

      “misconceptions” Mann might not actually be a woman in drag. There is now no ice in the arctic at all, Gore, Whadams, Hansen, Hunt? et al ignorami bed wetters. The troposhere is scorching all over. Mars isn’t warming, and earth didn’t break more cold records than hot this annum, you didn’t hear of the ice and cold from your idiot box did you, why is that. This is tiring, maybe snow white is a tranny too! Private jokes don’t smear in public.

    • Gator says:

      Snow White hates poor brown people.

      These were the bad projects. As you might see the bottom of the list was climate change. This offends a lot of people, and that’s probably one of the things where people will say I shouldn’t come back, either. And I’d like to talk about that, because that’s really curious. Why is it it came up? And I’ll actually also try to get back to this because it’s probably one of the things that we’ll disagree with on the list that you wrote down.

      The reason why they came up with saying that Kyoto — or doing something more than Kyoto — is a bad deal is simply because it’s very inefficient. It’s not saying that global warming is not happening. It’s not saying that it’s not a big problem. But it’s saying that what we can do about it is very little, at a very high cost. What they basically show us, the average of all macroeconomic models, is that Kyoto, if everyone agreed, would cost about 150 billion dollars a year. That’s a substantial amount of money. That’s two to three times the global development aid that we give the Third World every year. Yet it would do very little good. All models show it will postpone warming for about six years in 2100. So the guy in Bangladesh who gets a flood in 2100 can wait until 2106. Which is a little good, but not very much good. So the idea here really is to say, well, we’ve spent a lot of money doing a little good.

      And just to give you a sense of reference, the U.N. actually estimate that for half that amount, for about 75 billion dollars a year, we could solve all major basic problems in the world. We could give clean drinking water, sanitation, basic healthcare and education to every single human being on the planet. So we have to ask ourselves, do we want to spend twice the amount on doing very little good? Or half the amount on doing an amazing amount of good? And that is really why it becomes a bad project. It’s not to say that if we had all the money in the world, we wouldn’t want to do it. But it’s to say, when we don’t, it’s just simply not our first priority.

      http://www.ted.com/talks/bjorn_lomborg_sets_global_priorities/transcript?language=en

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dtbn9zBfJSs

    • KevinPaul says:

      I just realised you’re wearing a nappy on you mug outdoors, I guess if you can be fooled by climate alarm and hysteria, you’re a sitting duck for plandemic propaganda too. Seems you’re failing the realty IQ test there Jim.

      • Disillusioned says:

        You now just noticed that? He’s been proudly displaying that portion of his gullible ignorance for months. But yes, I agree – Covid19 panickers and climate panickers are largely one and the same.

  3. Al Shelton says:

    I sincerely hope that Tony’s video gets watched by Trump-et-al and drain that phony Gavin-et-al from the NOAA GISS swamp.

    A great video Tony. Thanks I can’t wait for part2.

  4. Anon says:

    Hi Tony,

    I pointed out this clip the other day:

    Tyler Cowen on “The Portal”, Ep. #016 (w/ Eric Weinstein) – The Revolution Will Not Be Marginalized.

    https://youtu.be/dP27fJ6Trbg?t=2681

    I just wonder what reaction you would get if you included 20 seconds of that video, before you get into all the rest of your analysis. I think it could be pretty powerful:

    Harvard educated physicist, Eric Weinstein, says: “You are not allowed to touch the temperature gauges”.

    Then something like: “But NASA sees no problem with that…”

    Just a thought…

  5. Anon says:

    Hi Tony,

    I pointed out this clip the other day:

    Tyler Cowen on “The Portal”, Ep. #016 (w/ Eric Weinstein) – The Revolution Will Not Be Marginalized.

    https://youtu.be/dP27fJ6Trbg?t=2681

    I just wonder what reaction you would get if you included 20 seconds of that video, before you get into all the rest of your analysis. I think it could be pretty powerful:

    Harvard educated physicist, Eric Weinstein, says: “You are not allowed to touch the temperature gauges”.

    Then something like: “But NASA sees no problem with that…”

    Just a thought…

    EDIT: Or after every NASA alteration, just insert that 5 second clip: “But, you are not allowed to touch the temperature gauges”… it could be pretty startling/funny as Weinstein is fairly well respected in the IDW and NASA is doing just that in every instance.

  6. Pauk Kay says:

    Hi Tony,
    Are you filtering my comments (under Not Q) and later not approving them? If yes, can you explain why?

  7. gatchaman says:

    Thank you for the excellent presentation.

    Has anyone attempted to look at the Reykjavík temperature history in the Berkeley, Japanese Meteorological Society, and Met Office Hadley Office data?

    I have repeated your argument that the NASA data comes from NOAA, and the comeback was that the argument of corroborating temperature histories is not weakened if there are only 4 as opposed to 5 corroborating global temperature histories.

    I agree with your argument that the histories are ridiculously too close together given the large parts of the Earth that do not have good long-term thermometer data, but I would prefer to leave opponents without a leg to stand on. Your argument would be further strengthened if it could be shown that, not only NASA, but also Berkeley, Japanese Meteorological Society, and Met Office Hadley Office data come from NOAA.

    • spike55 says:

      It all comes from GHCN, after adjustments.

      BEST use all the crappiest data they can find, and then sludge it together UHI et al.. using “regional expectations” Ie.. they make it match what they want it to.

      • gatchaman says:

        I don’t doubt it, but others will doubt the unsourced assertion you just made.

        Gavin Schmidt’s letter regarding NASA using GHCN data can be sourced, like so:
        https://www.smh.com.au/cqstatic/gstu6r/robertsnasags.pdf
        “Firstly, in the graphs you show the data is quite clearly (and correctly) labelledas originating from GHCN. For your information, GHCN stands for the Global HistoricalClimatology Network and is a project of the NOAA National Center for EnvironmentalInformation (NCEI):https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-acce…ts/global-historical-climatology-network-ghcn”

        Can you do the same for Berkeley, Japanese Meteorological Society, and Met Office Hadley Office?

  8. Joel says:

    Latest from the BBC: apparently the reason we havent seen all the ballyhooed “sea level rise” is because of all the giant dams that have been constructed. Right. Or could it be that there is no sea level rise crisis?

    • Disillusioned says:

      I have seen the sea level & tide gauge data many times…. as such, I’m gunna take a wild, educated guess and say it is the latter.

    • Disillusioned says:

      The fact that there is no sea level rise crisis is devastating to the propaganda messages purveyed by pal review natural climate change denying climate castastrophists (aka climate scientists), their cohorts in government, their loyal mockingbird media and social media.

  9. KevinPaul says:

    Ah ha, so here we have it, Jim couldn’t really give a stuff about arctic ice, or the corruption of science institutions, universities, journals, Fedral organisations and their data tampering, for Jim, it is purely political. Go watch Shadowgate and see what slime you are dealing with, it doesn’t matter who you vote for Jim, the shadow government is ALWAYS in control. Stalemate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.