Real Climate Science

Arctic sea ice extent is up 16% from last year.

2017     2016

Greenland ice growth is close to last autumn’s record high.

Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Mass Budget: DMI

Meanwhile, criminals in the press and academia insist that the Arctic is “melting more rapidly than expected.”

97% of government funded climate science is not a science. It is a criminal venture intended to defraud the public.

In January 1972, the National Science Foundation held a meeting at Brown University to discuss “climatic change” – when meant global cooling, which they said was of natural origin.

When Will the Present Interglacial End? | Science

Later that year, the participants sent a letter to President Nixon warning of a new ice age within a century.

THE ROLE OF NOAA’S CLIMATE PREDICTION CENTER IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CLIMATE SERVICES

The White House “seized” on the global cooling threat.

NASA’s top climate experts predicted a new ice age by the year 2021.

U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age Coming

The US Military responded to the global cooling, which they said was causing “extreme weather”

Everything which now gets blamed on global warming, was blamed on global cooling.

Scientists realized that global cooling was a potential big money scam for them.

In 1974, the New York Times reported on a meeting of climate experts in Germany. There was unanimous consensus that global cooling threatened the world’s food supply.

Walter Orr Roberts of NCAR was a key player behind this.

Climate Changes Endanger World’s Food Output – 1974 – NYTimes.com

In 1974, the CIA said global cooling would produce drought, famine, international conflict and political unrest throughout the world.

Daily News – Google News Archive Search

potentialtrends.pdf

The White House bought off on the global cooling/climate change scam, and by December, 1974 taxpayer dollars were permanently diverted extorted by the scientists. By the early 1980’s, the global cooling scam had seamlessly morphed into the global warming scam.

The climate mafia now denies the global cooling scam ever happened, saying it consisted of “nine paragraphs in Newsweek in 1975.” Climate criminals assume that everyone else is stupid and will believe anything they say.

How the “Global Cooling” Story Came to Be – Scientific American

There is nothing new about this however. Scientists have been pulling the same climate change scam for centuries.

10 Jan 1871 – IMAGINARY CHANGES OF CLIMATE

In this PRI article, the author conflates CO2 with “global warming” – and wants to starve billions of people to save them from micronutrient deficiencies.

Global warming threatens nutrition levels in staple crops | Public Radio International

Our entire food production and distribution system is based on fossil fuels. Without fossil fuels, there would be no food available for most of the world’s people – causing mass starvation like China and India had fifty years ago when their carbon footprint was small.

For progressives, starving other people to death for the sake of personal climate virtue signaling – is the highest form of morality.

If NASA and NOAA said “global warming is not a problem” they would immediately lose billions of dollars in funding. No one is going to pay them to study a non-problem.

They have a very fundamental conflict of interest, and they operate as the global warming team, coach, cheerleaders, referee, scorekeeper and press. They also try to prevent neutral third parties from offering an opinion.

It is difficult to imagine a more deeply corrupt situation or conflict of interest.  Forty years ago they obtained money by pushing global cooling.

Cooling or warming, it makes no difference to them. It is all about the money.

This morning, the Kestrel was hunting from an ice-covered Cottonwood tree.

The near record cold and ice was due to an overheated atmosphere caused by carbon emissions from the Valmont Power Plant

When he realized the danger he faced from carbon emissions, he quickly flew away towards the nearest shrew near the base of the tree.

Dr. Ruth from DMI, the Greenland ice growth and image processing denier – blamed last year’s record autumn ice growth on Hurricane Nicole.

Guest post: How the Greenland ice sheet fared in 2017 | Carbon Brief

This year is looking like a repeat of last year, but no hurricane. What is Dr. Ruth’s excuse for ignoring data this autumn?

Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Mass Budget: DMI

We are having our fourth October snowstorm in Boulder today, and yesterday afternoon never made it up to the freezing mark.

But on this date in 1950 it was 82 degrees in Boulder with 90 degree weather reported Colorado, Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona and California. More than half of the US was over 80 degrees that day.

From 1932 to 1950, Halloween was a warm day in the US. But temperatures plummeted after that and never recovered.

Experts say the Arctic is super-hot and the ice is melting, but mysteriously the hot Arctic air becomes very cold when it moves south.

Forecasters fear Britain could be battered by coldest winter for FIVE YEARS with temperatures plunging to -11C

I just bought my plane ticket to the UK for December.

I did some more research on my theory that the NOAA later winters hockey stick since 1990 is due to missing data. In the first graph below I plotted the number of valid days per month for the 100 stations with the fastest trend towards a later winter. As I expected, these stations have dropped from thirty days of valid temperatures per month in 1990, to six days per month now.

This confirms my suspicion that the apparent trend towards later winter since 1990 is largely due to data loss. If a station is missing temperature readings in October and November, that will cause the average date of the first freeze to come later.

Stations used in this analysis :

Claiming to speak for science, Seth “Arctic will be ice-free by 2012” Borenstein says  the first fall freeze is coming later in the US since the 1980’s.

Science Says: Jack Frost nipping at your nose ever later

I tested this out, and “confirmed” the findings in the study. There was no trend in the date of the first autumn freeze prior to the 1980’s, and a hockey stick since then.

This didn’t make any sense to me, because average October minimum temperatures haven’t changed, and because autumn snow cover has increased greatly – indicating that Arctic air is spilling further south than it used to in October.

Rutgers University Climate Lab :: Global Snow Lab

Rutgers University Climate Lab :: Global Snow Lab

So I looked at what was going on with the data. The hockey stick upwards coincides with NOAA’s massive loss of station data since the 1980’s, which makes a downwards hockey stick.

More than 40% of the USHCN monthly data is now fake.

If 40% of stations are failing to report in October, that pushes the date of the first freeze out by more than 12 days (40% of 31 days.) Average monthly temperatures aren’t affected much by intermittent data loss, but metrics like this one are heavily affected.

It is very likely that a large portion of the upwards trend since 1980 is simply due to data loss.  If there is no data for a particular station in October, then the first freeze will be pushed out at least 30 days at that station. As more daily data is lost, the average date gets pushed out further and further, causing a hockey stick. The trend is completely fake junk science, which are NOAA and Borenstein trademarks.

Additionally, the diurnal temperature variation is decreasing in the US due to Urban Heat Island issues.

Summers are getting shorter. The last 90 degree day comes earlier than it did a century ago. (Data loss would have the opposite effect, and cause it come later.)

This junk science is nothing new for Seth, who loves his fake post-1980 hockey sticks.

And his fake Arctic forecasts.

Star-News – Google News Archive Search

The Argus-Press – Google News Archive Search

There is no indication that fall freezes are coming later. We have already had two snowstorms in Boulder this month, with a third expected tomorrow.