USHCN creates a non-existent warming trend in the US by tampering with data. The actual thermometer data (blue line) shows a cyclical warming and cooling on a 70 year cycle. But the data released to the public looks entirely different (red line below.) It appears to be warming, which is not what the thermometers show.
They accomplish this using an impressive 1.5 degree data tampering hockey stick.
The steepest data tampering slope occurs since 1990, when they started making up huge amounts of data. Prior to 1990, they fabricated less than 10% of the data, but now they fabricate almost half of the data.
For example, all of the data this millennium at the Yuma Citrus Station, Az is fabricated.
These experts then go to the press and declare record temperatures, based on completely meaningless fake data which doesn’t even vaguely resemble the actual temperatures in their database.
The press has widely reported claims from Zeke that temperature trends are not adjusted upwards.
If the current trends in fabricated data continue, the next decade will see more than 100% of the data being made up. The only way that the so-called “climate scientists” will be able to continue is to go into the past and alter the data there.
Oh, wait… They have already done that, haven’t they?
Stunning levels of dishonesty!
Who’s responsible?
Tony, you were quoted over at the Daily Caller.
http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/09/more-evidence-of-climate-data-tampering-by-noaa/
USCHN Hockey Sticks exposed.
The alarmists do not do data, they only deal in artifacts.
Changes to temperature data after 2001 were made for the same reason NASA hid data from the 1995 Galileo probe of Jupiter:
To prevent public knowledge of the secret solar force that produced, in solar cycle #24, the lowest sunspot number recorded since 1750. (Sunspots are produced when powerful, deep-seated magnetic fields penetrate the photosphere.)
This secret solar force was ignored in climate models used by the UN’s IPCC.
See: “Super-fluidity in the solar interior: Implications for solar eruptions and climate”, Journal of Fusion Energy 21, 193-198 (2002)]: http://www.springerlink.com/content/r2352635vv166363/
it’s way past time to hit this guy with the ban hammer. He keeps re-posting this stuff on nearly every thread, over and over and over again. Enough already.
Mosh “Wrong.”
Show your work.
Mosh “Huh?”
“….which is not what the thermometers show.”
Which is incredible considering the GAO discovered “about 42% of all measuring sites NOAA depends on do not meet one or more of the siting standards”.
I wonder how much cooler the thermometer data trends would appear if all measuring sites met siting standards?
GAO Report – http://climatescienceinternational.org/images/stories/pdf/gao-report-2011.pdf
Excellent point.
Why are values being invented at Yuma Citrus? I’ve gone down there and checked out the siting – it’s grown urban over the years but the weather gear siting isn’t too bad. The place looks like a residence with a big front yard with the weather gear in the front yard.
this scandalous criminality is patently obvious to the most casual observer of these graphs yet the LSM does the deaf, dumb, and blind act. When oh when will we get ‘news’ reporters instead of ‘journalists’ back in the media???