Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Robertvd on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
The Democrats listed in this article all face eviction notices in November.
Seems the article is a bit of a bait and switch. On the one had you have a vote on “climate change legislation” on the other hand you have support for an “energy bill”. Energy Bill not equal Climate change legislation. Expanding Offshore drilling and removing impedients to building Nuclear Power plants and making more/better use of coal would all be things that could fall under the heading of “Energy bill” that would be as far from the “climate change” bill that those endangered congresscritters voted for as one could possibly get.
Steven, I think you will get a kick out of this.
You know how Americans have heard about those “Shovel Ready Jobs” to jumpstart the economy? Guess what, I found one:
http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward.do?AwardNumber=0902133
It appears that there are some good size coffers in the P2C2 $9.75-11mil/year for 35 awards.
http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10542/nsf10542.htm
We must have liked the Paleo so much, we couldn’t contain ourselves.
An energy bill is not the same as supporting AGW. A comprehensive energy policy has been the dream of many americans since the Arab oil embargo of the 70s. They want an energy bill that maps out a plan to make the US energy independent – and that is independent of AGW.
Remember this poll was done by the National Resources Defense Council Action Fund. What are they going to say? That there policies will result in their candidates getting wiped out in the next election?