A Different View Of Extreme Weather From 1975

12 Responses to A Different View Of Extreme Weather From 1975

1. omanuel says:

   April 19, 2014 at 3:41 pm

   Only yesterday did I finally grasped why my research mentor, Paul Kazuo Kuroda, risked his own life – everything – to bring secret diagrams and drawings of Japan’s wartime plans for an atomic bomb with him when he came to the United States:

   BBC on line article, “Atomic plans returned to Japan,” Saturday, 3 August 2002: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/2170881.stm

   Japan’s atomic bomb project was hidden from the public after the Second World War ended so ordinary citizens would not suspect why:

   1. The United Nations was formed on 24 Oct 1945, and
   2. Nuclear and solar physics were compromised in 1946.

   That answers the question I had asked the Congressional Space Science & Technology last year:.
   https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/WHY.pdf

   Here is the rest of the story:
   https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Chapter_2.pdf

   With deep regrets,
   – Oliver K. Manuel
   Former NASA Principal
   Investigator for Apollo

   Reply
   • Andy DC says:

     April 19, 2014 at 4:07 pm

     Oliver,

     I read over a fair amount of your material with considerable curiousity. It would appear that you have concluded that “neutron repulsion” is a great energy source, but that conclusion has been widely rejected. What have been the consequences of that rejection and what exactly should we be striving for?

     Thanks,

     Andy

     Reply
     • omanuel says:

       April 19, 2014 at 5:20 pm

       Good question, Andy!

       First, . . .

       1. Neutron repulsion is an empirical fact recorded as rest mass in 3,000 known atoms.

       2. Neutron repulsion is the source of energy that triggered the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

       3. The UN was formed on 24 Oct 1945 and deception began – as a noble effort to save the world from nuclear annihilation !

       4. Almost every field of physical science and every National Academy of Sciences assisted the deceit – to protect national security – before we finally saw why astronomy, astrophysics, climatology, cosmology, nuclear, particle, planetary and solar physics were nonsense.

       Now the answer, . . .

       5. FORGET PUNISHMENT or RETALIATION! Let go of blame. The Sun is a pulsar that made our elements and birthed the solar system. Humans are now ill-prepared to deal with that empirical reality.

       Again, forget the past and help society prepare to deal with the reality hidden from them for the past sixty-eight years !

       Reply
     • omanuel says:

       April 19, 2014 at 6:27 pm

       I might add, Andy,

       1. NEUTRON REPULSION is an empirical fact, not a theory.

       2. NEUTRON REPULSION “has been widely rejected” by those who will not openly discuss the nuclear rest mass data shown on pp. 19-20 !

       https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Chapter_2.pdf

       Reply
       • Andy DC says:

         April 20, 2014 at 1:38 am

         Oliver,

         Thanks for you thoughtful response. Have there been actual costs or serious consequences that have been suffered by rejecting this scientific fact?

         Andy
       • omanuel says:

         April 20, 2014 at 3:55 am

         Andy,

         In my opinion, there have been enormous damages and human costs from the 1945 decision to hide the source of energy stored – neutron repulsion – in cores of:

         1. Heavy atoms like Uranium
         2. Some planets like Jupiter
         3. Ordinary stars like the Sun
         4. Galaxies like the Milky Way

         Leaders of many nations, scientific organizations, the news media, research journals, universities, government agencies and politicians joined together to hide neutron repulsion in 1945, perhaps out of fear from Aston’s warning on 12 Dec 1922:

         “Should the research worker of the future discover some means of releasing this energy in a form which could be employed, . . . . the remote possibility must always be considered that the energy once liberated will be completely uncontrollable and by its intense violence detonate all neighbouring substances. In this event the whole of the hydrogen on the earth might be transformed at once and the success of the experiment published at large to the universe as a new star.”

         http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1922/aston-lecture.pdf

         Therefore, retaliation for damages and costs are NOT, in my opinion, in the best interest of anyone, and CERTAINLY NOT in the best interest of society.
       • omanuel says:

         April 20, 2014 at 4:11 am

         Let me re-phrase an answer, Andy.

         Our first priority should be to protect the survival of homo sapiens from this hidden empirical reality:

         The Sun – Earth’s heat source – is a pulsar that made our elements, birthed the solar system, sustained the origin and evolution of life and occasionally emits powerful electromagnetic pulses capable of destroying modern civilization.

         Preparation for that unanticipated event is far more important than compensation or punishment for past damages.
       • Andy DC says:

         April 20, 2014 at 5:02 pm

         Oliver,

         So I guess you are saying that the sun could start acting up and might at the least disrupt communications, perhaps do even a lot more damage than that.

         Also, this source of power, could it perhaps be harnessed to meet our energy needs?

         But if nothing else, it is another subject like global warming, where the public has been lied to.

         If you were king of the world, what policies would you impliment based upon this knowledge?

         Andy
       • omanuel says:

         April 20, 2014 at 5:56 pm

         1. Earth’s heat source – a pulsar – has always “acted up,” Andy.
         _ Priests, politicians, scientists cannot predict the next natural event.

         2. Aston’s 1922 Nobel Lecture explains difficulties in harnessing this.
         _ See the last paragraph of his lecture on December 12, 1266
         http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1922/aston-lecture.pdf

         3. All standard, post-1945 models of stars, nuclei and climate are lies

         4. Daily prayer for humility and courage to follow the will of our Creator
   • Brian H says:

     April 27, 2014 at 7:47 am

     Thread bomber.

     Reply
2. kim2ooo says:

   April 19, 2014 at 10:03 pm

   Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.

   Reply
3. omanuel says:

   April 21, 2014 at 10:23 pm

   You may solve Climategate yourself by

   a.) Studying reliable observations of the Sun – Earth’s heat source – and
   b.) Putting together this 69-year old puzzle:

   https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/A_69_Year_Puzzle.pdf
   https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/A_69_Year_Puzzle.doc

   Reply