http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/timeseries.global.anom.1979-2008
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
Reblogged this on The Grey Enigma.
Wow!! That’s crazy!!!
But, rowing season is near 😉
6th highest? Unless it is FIRST, it is due to global warming.
(Where did I put the sarc tag?)
What is the source of this data?
see the link below the graph, and yes, it is true. It is the only time in the record of three consecutive years in a row having above average global ice.
Check 1990 – 1992, are you a “warmist”, or do you just have difficulty with statistics?
A quick eyeball at the graph shown would seem to indicate that the average in 1990-1992 could have been high enough to discount those years. Don’t forget that the average will change with each new piece of data.
S.N.
Sorry I missed that. Thanks! Interisting data. I want to cite the source when I use this with my warmest associates.
Don’t the coolest warmists care?
This may sound silly at first…sea ice stats should be published at the equinoxes and solstices and the cross quarters in between …
There is science in the equinoxes and solstices and there is no science in our made up calendar which includes months named after roman emperors