British Sniper Kills Six Taliban With One Round At Half A Mile

A British sniper in Afghanistan killed six insurgents with a single bullet after hitting the trigger switch of a suicide bomber whose device then exploded, The Telegraph has learnt.

The 20-year-old marksman, a Lance Corporal in the Coldstream Guards, hit his target from 930 yards (850 metres) away, killing the suicide bomber and five others around him caught in the blast.

British-sniper-in-Afghanistan-kills-six-Taliban-with-one-bullet.html

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

151 Responses to British Sniper Kills Six Taliban With One Round At Half A Mile

  1. ozspeaksup says:

    damn good shooting

  2. Richard Mallett says:

    Good one for April Fools Day ! I suppose he claimed self defence 🙂

  3. philjourdan says:

    Taliban kids – they blow up so fast!

    Nice shooting lance Corporal!

  4. Robertv says:

    I would fight to get foreign troops occupying my country out of it. Didn’t the founding fathers do the same with the British ? American insurgents .

    • There Is No Substitute for Victory. says:

      Yes and no. After 7 years the Revolutionary War wound up as a war of liberation, the first successful war of liberation in the modern colonial era. That is also why I keep damning our leadership because no one in the last 13 years has ever formulated or even suggested a winning strategy in Afghanistan, Iraq, or anywhere else.

      I do wish to remind you that there is no nation on the face of this Earth named Afghanistan or Iraq for that matter. Afghanistan is the bits and pieces of dirt left over from British, French, and Russian attempt to sweep all the Earth’s dirt under their boots. Iraq is little more than a creation of expediency the British used help them get their butts out of a unwinnable situation in Iraq, where a native army handed the British the most humbling defeat at Cutt in what is now Iraq.

      • Andy says:

        “I do wish to remind you that there is no nation on the face of this Earth named Afghanistan or Iraq for that matter”

        That’s like saying there is no country called the USA because it is King George Land ….

        Andy

      • jdseanjd says:

        The mad reason? behind these wars, since & including Vietnam, are twofold:
        Banksters profits
        Depopulation.
        Banksters role in war was most nakedly exposed in Napoleonic times:
        One Rothschild brother was financing the Frogs.
        One Rothschild brother was financing the Brits.

        Whoever won, the Banksters won.

        Try: http://www.themoneymasters.com

        Catch Bill Still’s 3.5 hr Epic Documentary film of the same name, on youtube.
        Also his Wizard of OZ film, eyeopeners.
        Try: All wars are bankers wars via google or youtube.

  5. Andy DC says:

    They were in such a hurry to end their lives, so they got their wish!

  6. gator69 says:

    It’s good to see those Brits finally learned how to shoot. 😉

    • tom0mason says:

      When they stopped wearing red suits their aim got better.
      😉

      • Robertv says:

        It were the green suits that did the precision work.

        http://youtu.be/4ECvF86vl9I

        • tom0mason says:

          Yep!
          🙂

        • There Is No Substitute for Victory. says:

          FAMOUS LAST WORDS!
          “John Sedgwick was a career military officer and Union Army general during the American Civil War…
          Over the next two years, John Sedgwick led his division in many battles.  On May 9, 1864, Sedgwick and his men were probing the lines along the left flank of the Confederate defenses at the Battle of Spotsylvania Court House.  Confederate sharpshooters were about 1,000 yards (910 m) away and their shots caused members of Sedgwick’s division to dive for cover.  John Sedgwick was not concerned with the bullets and joked with his men, “What, men dodging this way for single bullets?  What will you do when they open fire along the whole line?  I am ashamed of you.  They couldn’t hit an elephant at this distance.”  Just seconds later, John Sedgwick fell forward with a bullet hole below his left eye.  He died instantly.  General Sedgwick was the highest ranking Union casualty during the Civil War. “

          boys and girls don’t sell the English short when it comes to long range marksmanship. After all the English invented the Whitworth Rifle as well as the Whitworth rifle match, with Queen Victoria firing the first shot at the first Whitworth match, scoring a (10X) with that shot.. The Whitworth was sometimes even equipped with telescopic sights and it is the same rife that ended Major General John Sedgwick’s career.

    • Bloke down the pub says:

      The last I heard, the record for the longest range confirmed kill is also held by a British sniper, Corporal of Horse Craig Harrison.

  7. tom0mason says:

    It a good news day!

  8. Jl says:

    Allah works in mysterious ways.

  9. Pathway says:

    You’d think that heaven would be running out of virgins.

    • There Is No Substitute for Victory. says:

      Allah is recycling the virgins so the joke is on the suicide bombers. After thirteen hundred years as a professional (or is it a professing) virgin I’ll bet that they can fake a pretty good orgasm.

    • stewart pid says:

      I was checking to see if someone had already beat me to the virgins wisecrack and indeed pathway was there first 😉

      • There Is No Substitute for Victory. says:

        TIC, that’s why they’ re faking it. Anyway those good Mohammad men in that place that we love to call Afghanistan believe that women are only intended for bearing children but that little boys were put on Earth for bacha bazi and Democrat Congressmen.

  10. geran says:

    This one will be in the record books for a long time!

  11. jdseanjd says:

    13 dreadful years we’ve been in this poor country, chewing up our nations’ wealth, & some of the best of our nations’ youth.
    It is madness.
    I’ll confess a vested interest, I’ve a young relative fighting out there.

    To celebrate the deaths of muslims fighting foreign invaders of their country, is to fall for the divide & conquer strategy of those running our govts. Us (Christians) Good. Them (Muslims) Bad.
    What simplistic twaddle.

    To take out Bin Laden, who wasn’t responsible for 9/11 anyway, google 9/11 hoax, should have been the job of a small group of special forces, following top intelligence.

    Instead we have seen an invasion & 13 year occupation, during which the acreage of poppies has gone from almost zero in 2000, under the Taliban, to the largest it’s ever been under “Democratic” NATO & the Mad American Empire. & the drugs are being exported to destroy the West’s youth.
    Google poppy acreage, & even the 1%s owned wikipedia will confirm.

    The “War on Terror” is a war on people.
    The “War on drugs” is a war on people.

    The NSA is spying on Americans because it’s govt owned & the US govt is owned by the banksters, & is at war with its own people.

    GCHQ in UK ditto.

    Canada? Australia? I bet it’s the same

    The depopulation plot of UN Agenda 21 is the Banksters & eugenicists plot carved in 110 tons of marble in the Georgia Guidestones.

    Think on.

  12. Anto says:

    He’ll be dining out on that for a long time to come!

  13. inMAGICn says:

    jdseanjd

    (Cue “Twilight Zone” vamp)

  14. jdseanjd says:

    Heaven’s not running out of virgins, there’s one born every minute.

    What Heaven is running out of is All Knowing, All Loving, All Seeing All powerful old men with long white beards who love you so much they’ll burn you in Hellfire for all Eternity unless you keep giving him money, & keep giving his (mind) control freak coward priestines your kids to indoctrinate & pervert.

    Do you think the guff Muslims are fed is that much different from the guff we’ve been fed for almost 2000 years. George Carlin puts it way better than I.

    We live in interesting times.

  15. inMAGICn says:

    Cue Twilight Zone

  16. Richard Mallett says:

    It’s very interesting that many here view the American President as a dictator, yet his troops are trying to export American freedom to other countries like Afghanistan and Iraq (and to many other countries in the past, with similar lack of success)

  17. Richard Mallett says:

    Well, if you kill the local population, I guess you can say that they are now free, in a sense.

  18. jdseanjd says:

    Geran & Gator, neither of you want to address the points I’m making, so be it.

    Regards the Pentagon, if you’re determined to shift the debate, from what I’ve seen & read the damage there was consistent with a missile & totally inconsistent with a large plane impact.

    No plane debris, a tiny impact hole, an impossible flight path for experienced pilots, never mind ill trained novices.

    Google pilots for 9/11 truth.

    Face it, the US govt, 1%s owned, & the major media, 1%s owned, have sold the biggest lies in history.

    Get real.

    • philjourdan says:

      That is a flat out lie. Missiles do not leave skid marks. Check your sites again. And then there is that nasty little bit of trivia of the thousands of people on I-395 who SAW the plane buzzing them before impacting the pentagon.

      Just more inconvenient facts.

      And for the last time, the Pentagon IS 9-11. Separating them, or making up stories now is merely doing your best CYA. You lost.

      • jdseanjd says:

        Mud slinging. Noise. You lost. The science is settled.
        HAHAHAHAHA.
        I never claimed the Pentagon wasn’t 9/11.
        I like being accused of what I haven’t said, it shows how dumb my “debating” partners are.
        I’ve given solid references, you’ve come back with invective.
        I’ve lost?

        • philjourdan says:

          YOu said the pentagon was a distraction. Therefore you are saying it was not part of 9-11 (it would not be a distraction if it was part). Saying you lie is not mud slinging. It is a documented fact – twice over now.

          As for how dumb your debating partners may be, we will never know since you have yet to debate. You have lectured and lied, but that is not debating.

          So yes, you have lost.

        • jdseanjd says:

          I said I said zero about the Pentagon, but since those guys brought up the Pentagon, I ventured some solid references, & some opinions.
          I have NOT said the Pentagon was a distraction.

          Where the feck have you got that from?

          It was obviously part of the same hoax.

          You’re a troll.

        • philjourdan says:

          Regards the Pentagon, if you’re determined to shift the debate,

          My pardons. You did not use the word “distraction”. You stated ‘shift the debate”. But since the debate IS 9-11, it means the same thing. And you have offered NO EVIDENCE of any of your kook theories. I will admit you have offered some kook theories of your own, but without a scintilla of evidence.

          And I am sure you love calling others what you have been told you are. However a troll is one who comes in, thread bombs with kooky theories, and disrupts the discussion, Now who could that be describing? Would that be JD Sean with the stutter? YEP!

          Not even a nice try. Next time, try picking on someone with your own IQ – say a turnip?

        • jdseanjd says:

          No evidence, no references, personal attacks. Distraction.
          Classic troll.
          Love it.

          I’ve got no worries about my IQ, troll, I tested out quite fine.

          You?

          Send in an adult, boy.

        • philjourdan says:

          Uh, better reread that sean. There were NO personal attacks. There was a rebuttal. So you lied again.

          Now that defines a troll. Someone who lies about what is easily read on the same page!

          Got your spock ears dusted there troll baby?

        • philjourdan says:

          Send in an adult, boy.

          Hmm. so besides being a troll, you are also a pedophile. The NSA knows now.

        • gator69 says:

          “It was absolutely a plane, and I’ll tell you why,” says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. “I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box.” Kilsheimer’s eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: “I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?”

          http://www.popularmechanics.com/_mobile/technology/military/news/1227842

          But don’t bother with facts, just stick with your selective fictions.

        • jdseanjd says:

          You’d rather believe ‘Popular Mechanics’ than professionally qualified Architects, Engineers & Pilots?

          An article that no one would put their name to? By the editors?

          Really?

          Do me a favour, mate, send in an adult.

        • philjourdan says:

          Popular Mechanics IS professional qualified engineers and scientists.

          You do not get out much do you sean?

        • gator69 says:

          Care to address the facts instead of attacking the messenger? I will repeat, my brother worked at the Pentagon the day it was attacked. They picked up pieces of the plane and witnessed the wing imprints on the wall. Go peddle your fairy tales where there are children who will appreciate them.

        • jdseanjd says:

          Assertions. Send me something substantial I can check out.

          I’ve referenced several sites, I was you, I’d stop digging.
          You’re out of your depth.

        • philjourdan says:

          He listed several sites. Try Popular mechanics. That is probably the best (but of course for nutters, everyone is in on the conspiracy, right?)

        • gator69 says:

          You have the link I provided. Disprove the information there, then maybe produce all the missing passengers. You are a joke.

        • jdseanjd says:

          You referenced a story no one had put their name to.

          Try : http://www.globalresearch.ca

        • gator69 says:

          I have made zero “assertions”. I provided facts that you whine about, because you don’t like the web address.

          You have made crazed assertions that 911 was some kind of inside job. To a punk, that may seem reasonable, as you likely grew up hearing this BS, but were too immature to properly analyze the data. I will NEVER forget the first time I heard one of you nutjobs going on about an inside job. The fool had been mentally masturbating in his basement on the Internet.

          I listened to my brother talk about the attack, heard about the plane and body parts, and felt the pain. Then bastards like you started foaming at the mouth, denying the obvious and spouting ridiculous unsupportable stories. You are no different than the alarmists. You refuse to address the facts on the ground, and point to far out web sites that spout nonsense.

          Put up or STFU. You are as disgusting as a Holocaust denier.

  19. jdseanjd says:

    I like yanking Troll chains.
    Here’s some more to chew on.
    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info

    Here’s some previous False Flag events, The US has history.
    The non existent Gulf of Tonkin incident, to get the US people behind the Vietnam disaster.
    Catch Jesse Ventura on Youtube on 9/11 & agenda 21.
    Try Pearl harbour, the US Navy had broken Jap codes & knew that was coming, but something dramatic was needed to “Awaken the sleeping giant”.
    Try the Lusitania for WWI

    Go on Youtube & put in Lord Monckton on United Nations Agenda 21
    51 mins

    I’ll put up plenty more if you like.

    • gator69 says:

      Gee, does this sound familiar? 😆

      “Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) engineering professor Thomas W. Eagar was at first unwilling to acknowledge the concerns of the movement, saying “if (the argument) gets too mainstream, I’ll engage in the debate.” In response to Steven E. Jones’ publishing a hypothesis that the World Trade Center was destroyed by controlled demolition, Eagar said that adherents of the 9/11 Truth movement would use the reverse scientific method to arrive at their conclusions, as they “determine what happened, throw out all the data that doesn’t fit their conclusion, and then hail their findings as the only possible conclusion.[115]”

      http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/911_Truthers

      Even Wiki gives no credence to nutjobs…

      “The September 11 attacks (also referred to as September 11, September 11th, or 9/11)[nb 1] were a series of four coordinated terrorist attacks launched by the Islamic terrorist group al-Qaeda upon the United States in New York City and the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area on Tuesday, September 11, 2001.”

      http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks

      Take your sick fantasies somewhere else.

      • jdseanjd says:

        Do some proper research & I think you’ll find that the 1%s owned Wikipedia has misled you.

        I’ve researched this on many sites, before I was sure enough to post.

        • gator69 says:

          Good troll! Attack the website, and ignore the facts.

          You certainly have a fool proof system. 😆

      • jdseanjd says:

        Gator, here’re some facts:
        1) those towers could have withstood multiple plane impacts. One single plane MIGHT have bent them a little. The Architect who designed them has said this.
        2) the aircraft fuel vapourised on impact, the plume of black smoke.
        3) the following fires, office furniture, cabling etc do not burn at anywhere near a hot enough temperature to melt steel.
        4) steel framed structures have burned for days without coming down.
        5) both towers fell at “Freefall” speed = no internal resistance= structural steel demolished= a perfectly controlled demolition.
        6) building 7 came down at “Freefall” speed also, WITHOUT the benefit of a dramatic plane impact
        7) this is the basis on which Tony Rooke won his Brit court case. These buildings came down at the speed of acceleration caused by gravity, 32ft/sec/sec. proving all internal structure had been removed.
        8) a BRIT judge knew he couldn’t repeal or ignore Newton’s Law of Gravity, you?
        9) The setting of charges, probably nanothermite, would have needed mucho time & care, needing the cooperation of those running the building.
        10) the flight of these planes through the most heavily guarded airspace in the World would have needed the cooperation of the US Govt. Dick Cheney.
        11) it’s not just the climate your Govt is lying about.

        You want more, I’ll put up plenty more. Since you’ve been so successful in diverting the ‘debate’ away from my most important point, I’ll repeat it here, purely to bug you.

        Year 2000, Taliban had Afghan poppy fields down to almost zero.
        Now they’re at their greatest extent ever, & the Heroin is being exported to ruin the youth of the West. This shows the Sociopaths & psychopaths running our Western Govts.

        • gator69 says:

          Your “facts” are cherry picked, just like the AGW crowd. You pick the sources and “facts” that agree with your agenda and discard the rest. You would make a great leftist.

        • philjourdan says:

          Sorry JD, those are not facts. They are your opinion. An opinion couched in a web of conspiracy in which no evidence, no proof will ever satisfy you. They are wrong. And you take comfort in your error and ignorance.

        • jdseanjd says:

          They’re ALL facts.
          Prove ONE of them wrong.
          Just One, PLEASE.

          Newton’s law of gravity is my opinion?
          HAHAHAHAHA

          You chuck a brick out a window, & it falls at free fall speed, no resistance but air pressure, at an acceleration due to gravity of a proven rate of acceleration of 32 ft per sec per sec.

          The most elementary physics.

          My opinion?

          Stop digging man, you’re showing yourself up badly.

        • philjourdan says:

          The hole is all yours. They are your opinion. To wit:

          1) those towers could have withstood multiple plane impacts. One single plane MIGHT have bent them a little. The Architect who designed them has said this.

          No they could not. They were not designed to withstand the larger planes (707s were the design specification, and then only empty).

          Can buildings survive impacts greater than design specifications? Sure. But there is no guarantee. in other words, it is not a fact. It is your opinion. An ignorant one at that.

          Your list is full of ignorance and opinion. You are so blinded by your ignorance that you cannot even see how foolish you look.

          So keep digging. You are a fruit loop. Mildly entertaining, but a fruit loop never the less.

    • gator69 says:

      Actually dad wrote a paper on the Lusitania for the Air War College back in 1977 after I have him the book “Lusitania”. Dad also served in Viet Nam and we are all aware of the Gulf of Tonkin incident.

      Troll, why can you not address the facts I put before you? Why are we now talking about other historical events? Run out of gas? 😆

      • jdseanjd says:

        My agenda is truth, the exposure of lies, & the future prosperity & betterment of mankind.
        This involves the prevention of future wars, which benefit only the banksters.
        This also involves the deconstruction of both the myths we have been fed, such as the world is overpopulated, or that mankind is a plague upon the planet.
        Try: http://www.drtimball.com
        His essay: Overpopulation, the fallacy behind the fallacy of global warming.

        • gator69 says:

          No, your agenda is NOT the truth. I have shown you the face according to same human beings, and you choose to ignore them and listen to the nutjobs.

          I don’t need any tutorials from you, especially not on AGW.

        • gator69 says:

          “Facts”, not “face”. iPhart.

        • gator69 says:

          And “sane”, not “same”. Another iPhart.

        • philjourdan says:

          if your objective was indeed truth, you would not be insulting those who did not agree with you, and you would be examining the evidence which does not support you hypothesis. instead, you have done everything exactly opposite of your stated goal.

          No one has made you do that. You have voluntarily done it to yourself.

    • philjourdan says:

      You forgot JFK and the CIA and the faked moon landings.

      Did you participate in the Lewandowsky survey? I think he found his sample.

  20. Andyj says:

    Good comments jdseanjd.
    Except for the small fact a plane really did smack into the pentagon. Yes, it was in inside job like all the others.

    Same with all the chosen countries being systematically turned into sh1t with help from the west and the house of Saud.
    Wars are fought for only one reason. The reason is to make money; from your taxes. Using your kins blood paid with your pennies.

    The day Russia shuts off the gas/oil taps via ‘ghan. When the fields are sprayed with poison until the heroin your soldiers are protecting never grows again. When ‘ghans children are born inside out is the day the west walks away from it, from unprofitability. This “war” has not changed since before the Russians or the British. Just another fresh set of kids to kill while fat & stupid mothers swing their national flag.

    Ukraine (the basket case) has backfired. Putin was, as usual, three chess moves ahead of the west. Now the west has a $15Bn promise to uphold plus they have to re-sell them Putins gas at 30% off. For what?? They sh1t out the jewel in the crown.

    The US offered to bomb that North Korean oil tanker if the money to fill it wasn’t paid to the “new” Libyan Gov’t instead of the Benghazi who’s oil it is. They who fought for their freedom and killed Ghadaffi; with big help from the west, Qatar and Saud.

    Most US denizens were deceived to imagine Saddam Hussein done 9-11. So they attacked Iraq.. Oh wait.. lol

    Who’s the evil ones about to invade every country and kill everyone. Oh, that will be Iran ?????

    Sorry for your loss Gator. Good job that part of the pentagram, (I know, symbol of protection) had just been rebuilt and wasn’t fully manned. But the hive needed a good kicking before tossing it into the next house.

    For whom the Gods wish to destroy, first they make mad!

    • jdseanjd says:

      Thanks for the support, AndyJ, much appreciated.

      Google : All wars are bankers wars.

      Regards,
      JD.

      • Gail Combs says:

        “All wars are bankers wars.”
        ………….
        Now ain’t that the truth.

        Think about it. There are only two good reasons to go to war.
        1. The aggressor country gets more value in land, loot resources than it expends (and war is VERY expensive.)

        2. You are defending against an aggressor country.

        It has only been since the Central Bankers got into the act that wars have become so common place. Look at the result. Europe and other countries demolished and the USA a 17.5 trillion in debt. Also note that the USA was isolationist until the Bankers got the Federal Reserve Act passed in December 2013. The USA ended that isolationist policy in 1915 (With a vocal FDR leading the charge) and has been almost continuously in some war or another as the “World’s Policemen” ever since.

        Result? In the United States the share of the top 1 percent now accounts for about 20 percent of total U.S. income (Alvaredo and others, 2012)

        The U.S. military expenditure as a % of GDP is between 4.5% – 5% while most countries including China spend around 1 to 2 % of GDP unless they are in a war zone like the middle east.

  21. jdseanjd says:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhxZxL56B00 53 mins
    Dr Paul Craig Roberts on US Govt & Media lies re Ukraine & Gold

    Some more lies for Gator the incoherent & Geran the insults expert to swallow.
    Enjoy.

  22. jdseanjd says:

    Hey, I just realised I forgot another False Flag event.
    Try the USS Maine, way back for the US Spanish war.

  23. jdseanjd says:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=509xQgcoMN8
    OR: win every 9/11 debate with this one fact!
    3.32 mins.
    Building 6 hollowed out.

    Thanks, chaps, I’d never even heard of building 6 till you prompted me to look into 9/11 again.
    I’m most grateful. 🙂

  24. gator69 says:

    All one needs to know about jd…

    jdseanjd says:
    April 8, 2014 at 9:22 pm
    “I doubt your assertion, but can’t be bothered to check it out. It’s minor details.”

    jd suffers from an unknown number of cognitive issues, and we can count confirmation bias as one. jd refuses to acknowledge any info that contradicts his world view, just like CAGW alarmists. And just like the alarmists he has his favorite cherry picked sites and sources, ignoring everything else. jd thinks, like the alarmists, that the test of is just have not been exposed to the “correct” info, and could not be more wrong. I myself looked into the 911 Truthers and found them to be highly dishonest. And unlike jd, I already knew about the false claims made by Truthers about building 6.

    Once again jd reflects the same pattern as the alarmists, in that he actually knows less about the subject than his sane counters parts, and this is why…

    “I doubt your assertion, but can’t be bothered to check it out. It’s minor details.”

    Truth is just a “minor detail” to jd.

  25. jdseanjd says:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96INZHwCRms
    OR: Ben Swann Goes # Off the Grid JESSE VENTURA OFF THE GRID

    Govt drug running…dishonest media… crony capitalist Fascist system
    Got the lot. 17 mins.
    Enjoy.

  26. jdseanjd says:

    More False Flags than you could run up two poles.

    US, EU, NATO, Saudi, Israeli, Turkey & Brunei etc
    involvement in Collaborative Terrorism, destabilisation, drug running, people trafficking & murder of Christians. Washington’s hegemony plans revealed by Gen Wesley Clarke.

    http://www.ukcolumn.org/article/abdelbaset-al-megrahi-lockerbie—and-lies-we-have-been-told

    Enjoy.

    • gator69 says:

      The conspiracy troll strikes (out) again! :lol

      Instead if relying on sane sources, jd runs off and located another kook…

      “Does Wesley Clark have an imaginary friend? The retired NATO commander and possible Democratic presidential candidate has been muttering darkly for several months that opportunists in the White House seized September 11 as a pretext to take out Saddam Hussein. Clark maintains that he received a call at home the afternoon of September 11, 2001, urging him to say on CNN that the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were connected to Iraq. But Clark has now provided three versions of this story, and they don’t add up.”

      http://m.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/002zlaay.asp

      Unable to support his unsupportable narrative, jd is now Googling “False Flag Operations”, throwing sh*t at the wall, and hoping it sticks.

      But just remember boys and girls according to jd, the truth is a “minor detail”, one for which he has no time.

      Blather on conspiracy nut!

  27. jdseanjd says:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU961SGps8g

    Best deconstruction of US Govt lies re 9/11 I’ve yet seen. 1hr 45 mins.
    2800 + people sacrificed to enable the barbaric “War on Terror”

    A most disgusting hoax.

    • gator69 says:

      Nobody cares to review your sick fantasies, you look more and more like an idiot with each new post. But hey, knock yourself out champ! 😆

      • jdseanjd says:

        I posted in evidence a 1 hr 45 min film which it took many people many hours to make.

        You come back in a few minutes with nothing but insults, having not examined the film at all.

        do you not have the faintest clue how dumb & vicious you are making yourself look?

        • David A says:

          jdseanjd says:
          April 8, 2014 at 9:22 pm
          “I doubt your assertion, but can’t be bothered to check it out. It’s minor details.”
          =============================================
          jd, that says it all. I recommend you google the opposite of what you believe for even 1/2 the time you spend on your ideology. Also, stop assuming that those with a different perspective are unaware of your viewpoint. As for myself I have spent several hours on each side of the 9/11 arguments, and I am sorry, but the truthers , in the end, are very unconvincing.

        • gator69 says:

          It’s commenters like jd that give skeptics a bad rep. One who accepts all conspiracy theories, while refusing to look at facts, is a nut.

          “jdseanjd says:
          April 8, 2014 at 9:22 pm
          “I doubt your assertion, but can’t be bothered to check it out. It’s minor details.”

          Houston, we have a problem.

        • philjourdan says:

          And I am sure you think The Da Vinci Code is non-fictional as well. As it took those people a lot LONGER to make.

          So the test for fiction to jd is how long it takes someone to create the conspiracy ideation. You are right Gator – he has hit bottom and kept on digging.

      • jdseanjd says:

        Did you even glance at the 1 hr 45 min film I posted above?

        A furniture fire doesn’t reach even half the temperature needed to soften steel, never mind collapse steel instantaneously.

        2 planes cannot cause 3 perfectly controlled demolitions.

        No capacity for logic at all?

        • gator69 says:

          “jdseanjd says:
          April 8, 2014 at 9:22 pm
          “I doubt your assertion, but can’t be bothered to check it out. It’s minor details.”

        • Gail Combs says:

          Give it a break JD and Gator, you have been at it for 10 days. Neither is going to convince the other.

          I think we can all agree that at least the present District of Criminals stinks to high heaven. Lets concentrate on cleaning out that nest of vipers.

          Whether 9/11 was an inside job I do not think we will ever know unless someone comes clean in their posthumous autobiography.

          For both of you:
          excerpts from the book
          Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler

          excerpts from
          The New Freedom
          a book by Woodrow Wilson, 1961

          excerpts from
          The Anglo-American Establishment
          by Carroll Quigley
          Quigley was Bill Clinton’s mentor and mentioned in his acceptance speech.

        • philjourdan says:

          Those who lost loved ones that day are not going to allow idiots to politicize their loss for their own ignorance of self aggrandizement.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Dang blew it. Last book was
          The Anglo-American Establishment

          And here is another excerpt from a Carroll Quigley book
          Tragedy and Hope
          A History of the World in Our Time

        • gator69 says:

          Gail, so sorry to hear that you have not figured out that 911 was not an inside job. Maybe if you were aware of this fact you would be as incensed as myself at such ridiculous and sick claims.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Gator,
          I am neutral on the subject of 9/11 because I do not have the information or knowledge to evaluate it.

          However I am NOT neutral on the evil that migrates to Washington DC. There is plenty of evidence that those in control of our government are not working in the best interests of the American people. Unfortunately the evidence goes back over 100 years

        • Richard Mallett says:

          Why do Americans believe they have the best system of government, and the worst politicians ?

        • gator69 says:

          Gail, you can point to a bank and say that is where bank robbers are found, but not everyone in the bank is a robber. You have the capacity to figure it out yourself, start with the Pop Mech link I provided.

        • philjourdan says:

          You did not see ground zero that day. There was nothing “perfect” about the demolition. What you SAW (from miles away) was only part of the demolition. And using your ants view, you “think” it is perfect. The reality is quite different.

          Since I have already given you the link to esteemed Engineers and their report and you have decided not to read it, I see no reason you will try to learn in the future either.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Gator, I looked a long time ago and shoved it into the neutral category along with the issue of Obummers birth place.

          Unless the Supreme Court or Congress wants to start digging at those two items I am not really interested because it allows ‘Progressives’ to label us as ‘Kooks.’ I rather go after topics that are more neutral like food and the Banksters where there is a lot more fodder and a lot less political polarization.

          My goal is to wake people up to the fact our government is “NOT here to help you” but is here to fleece you of as much wealth and freedom as it can.

          At least some ‘Socialists’ have figured out it is all about making us free-range serfs link and video

        • gator69 says:

          Gail, until July of last year I worked for a large bank. The biggest problem is not banks, but politicians who through their meddling force banks to seek “alternative” means of profit. Where we agree is that our government is too large. The Dodd Frank Act has done more damage to our financial system than anything in the past three decades.

          Take 911 out of neutral and gain more credibility.

        • philjourdan says:

          Gator,

          It is not “people who work in banks”, but an ethereal group of people who are never seen, but control the banks and hence the world. Club of Rome, Fabians, etc. That is the part Gail is against.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Gator, Neutral is I do not have the facts or expertise to make a decent judgment. Better to say that then go along to get along. (I have always been a contrarian)

          On banks, It is the Fractional Reserve part I have the problem with. At this point banks are at ZERO RESERVE

          So tell me how on God’s little green earth can a business entity printing money out of nothing and lending it at interest go bankrupt without really really screwing up?

          And yes I am aware of the idiotic:

          Housing and Community Development Act of 1992

          RTC Completion Act – implement provisions designed to improve the agency’s record in providing business opportunities to minorities and women.. Expands the existing affordable housing programs of the RTC and the FDIC by broadening the potential affordable housing stock of the two agencies….
          http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/important/index.html

          I am also well aware the larger corporate entities manipulate laws in such a way that they bankrupt smaller entities. The big banksters have been doing that to the smaller banks for well over a century. All they have to do is get the Fed/politicians to change the methods of ‘Accounting’ or the lending rates to put a ‘solvent’ bank suddenly into the red.

          f I recall that was just done again recently but I do not have the links.

        • gator69 says:

          Gail, the banks did not want the housing act or Dodd-Frank. Large businesses always put smaller businesses out of business, this is nothing new.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Phil,
          Thank you again.
          You are correct it is the Puppeteers I am against. I use ‘banksters’ because I spend a lot of time trying to nudge the left of centers towards the center and open their eyes to the fact the puppeteers exist.

          The waters are so blasted muddy it is hard to shoot the shark and leave the dolphin alone. For example I am very pro-capitalism but I hate the international corporate cartels. Again the Puppeteers.

          This paper by a couple physicists gets into it The Network of Global Corporate Control

    • philjourdan says:

      I bet you believe everything you hear. Some people are so gullible.

      And yet, still not a single fact.

  28. jdseanjd says:

    http://www.informationclearimghouse.info/article38192.htm

    Dr. Paul Craig Roberts: Gold price rigging, Ukraine, Russia, China, US economic failure 2014, US offers EU war & sacrifice, Russia & China offer trade & friendship etc etc.

    • Gail Combs says:

      The link does not work.

      • jdseanjd says:

        Cheers, Gail.

        That link was working earlier.
        Try: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info
        on its own, then scroll down to Paul Craig Roberts article, 3rd down 38192

        This chap has an impressive cv, & cannot be dismissed as a kook.
        He has his own website : http://www.paulcraigroberts.org

        Since I learned of the ~80 million deaths caused by EPA/US “Environmental”,/US Govt foreign aid policy, & agenda 21’s depopulation plot, I’ve realised, as you have, the depths of evil in the central bank owned US Govts, DEM or REP.

        I’ll certainly look at your refs.

        For DDT: Wildavsky,Aaron. “But is it true? A citizen’s guide to Environmental Health and Safety Issues.” Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1994, or 1995.

        Also: Michael Crichton’s novel, “State of Fear”

        Have a good weekend.
        JD.

        • Gail Combs says:

          I know who Paul Craig Roberts is. Unfortunately he seems a bit far out on the subject of Israel. On the other hand I am really down on Banksters, I just do not equate them with the Jewish people.

  29. Gail Combs says:

    Richard Mallett says: @ April 11, 2014 at 2:18 pm

    Why do Americans believe they have the best system of government, and the worst politicians ?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    We do have a good system of government. No government is perfect and all governments can be hijacked. The US government was hijacked in 1913 and we still have not ousted the hijackers.

    The details of the hijacking are in Congressman McFadden’s Speech – 1934 He was ousted from Congress shortly afterwards and when he would not shut up he was assassinated on Oct. 3, 1936.

    Since then few other politicians have been willing to stick their necks out.
    From President Woodrow Wilson’s book:

    The New Freedom, 1961
    Pg. 24:
    Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.

    They know that America is not a place of which it can be said, as it used to be, that a man may choose his own calling and pursue it just as far as his abilities enable him to pursue it; because to-day, if he enters certain fields, there are organizations which will use means against him that will prevent his building up a business which they do not want to have built up; organizations that will see to it that the ground is cut from under him and the markets shut against him

    That last paragraph I know is true because I was in a front row seat when it happened to the international corporation I was working for. The owner ticked off Shell Oil by snatching out from under their nose not one but two companies that Shell wanted to acquire. The owners of Shell who also control the World Wild Life Fund went after him in the news and just about bankrupted him.

    You might remember it. The polystyrene is EVIL scare in the 1980s that blew up out of nowhere all over the USA. It was timed to hit a month before McDonald, Polysar and Sweetheart Plastics had scheduled TV ads to announce joint venture for a new factory. The factory would employ the handicapped and recycle POST consumer polystyrene from McDonald restaurants.

    It really was a great idea. My favorite boss was the Chem Engineer in charge of the design.

    • jdseanjd says:

      I have never equated banksters with Jews.
      I’m not that simple, Gail, which is why I refer to 1%s banksters.
      It’s a (predatory) mindset, not a religion or a nationality.

      • Gail Combs says:

        I know you are not. Most people with brains can tell the difference.

        That is why I wish Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was a little more circumspect in his targeting of Israel. It makes it easy for his detractors to label him as a kook which is exactly what my husband did after reading his article and doing a bit of a search on the internet.

        Is Dr Roberts 100% correct? Of course not, but it is worth cross checking what he says with other pieces of information.

        • jdseanjd says:

          I’m quite sure that Dr. PCR, when he says “Israel” means the 1%s psychopaths % power mad sociopaths in charge of the banking & politics, same as in every country, near as I can see. I’m sure that 90+% of Israelis want no more than a good life for themselves, & good prospects for the future for their progeny & everyone else also.

          I know there are strong voices of protest within Israel at how Spartanised their society has been forced to become in subjugating the Palestinians.

          Divide & Conquer, Gail, First Principles of Empire. Not applied from the grass roots upward.

  30. gator69 says:

    “philjourdan says:
    April 11, 2014 at 4:49 pm
    Those who lost loved ones that day are not going to allow idiots to politicize their loss for their own ignorance of self aggrandizement.”

    Amen brother.

    • jdseanjd says:

      You call me an idiot. Que?
      You say I’m politicising your loss, but I steadfastly adhere to no political party. regarding them all as equally corrupt, lame brained, useless & subservient to the bankster/corporatist fascist bar stewards who fund their ego trip campaigns & reigns.
      Believe me, it’s no different here in the UK.
      You accuse me of self aggrandisement, when I’m posting comments anonymously to a small readership. Que?
      You accuse me of ignorance, when, housebound through illness for a couple of years, now thankfully past, I was able to devote those couple of years to research in areas I am interested in.
      Ignorant, I think not.
      I am sorry for your loss, but believe you should direct your efforts to establishing the perpetrators, not spitting venom at commentators.

      • gator69 says:

        “jdseanjd says:
        April 8, 2014 at 9:22 pm
        “I doubt your assertion, but can’t be bothered to check it out. It’s minor details.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *