Experts somehow forgot to mention that Arctic sea ice has been increasing.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- arn on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
Really? From the same source
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/current.anom.jpg
Andy
That graph shows no change over the last 10 years
Really?
So lets take a look…
Ummm…
It’s remarkable how many people can’t read a graph…
cough…. (cherry),,, cough…. (picking),,, Come on, Steven, Andy gives you the 36 year trend, and all you can come up with is a cherry picked ten year trend that is flat? I could cherry pick a three year trend that would indicate a frozen globe in two decades. Isn’t that what you endlessly gripe about what the ‘alarmists’ are doing? Is this simply a battle of the half-wits? Get some science on your side and quit claiming that your bullshit is ‘real’.
mogur, the “science” of the AGW folks indicated the Arctic would be ice free by now. If your “science” is wrong, maybe you need to seek a new guru.
Hint: Seek a “messiah” that can repeatedly predict the future.
so for the past 10 years…..they were saying it’s decreasing….and were lying
But, if the Arctic is losing ice, and the Antarctic is gaining ice, won’t the planet flip over?
(Cool, I like Australian chicks.)
WOW!!!
That is how the magnetic poles reverse.
Now we know how it happens… Thank you.
No prob, Gail.
Yup, the IPCC needs to know this.. AGW causes pole reversals, which then causes frequency shifts, which then cause meteorites, which then causes… need I continue?
Should I expect my Nobel in the mail?
Sorry Rose just ate it.
Goats can turn cellulose into fuel.
That is a problem for evolutionists.
But, we probably don’t want to go there….
E.M. Smith had a cool essay on that point link