Al Gore
John Kerry
Barack Obama
John McCain
Mitt Romney
None of the five know anything about science, and all five are determined to “control the climate.“
Al Gore
John Kerry
Barack Obama
John McCain
Mitt Romney
None of the five know anything about science, and all five are determined to “control the climate.“
Reblogged this on CLINGERS… BLOGGING BAD ~ DICK.G: AMERICAN ! and commented:
GyG!!!!!!!!!!!
They’re also all democrats. LOL
Reblogged this on Reality Check and commented:
They can’t control spending….or their mouths most of the time.
Don’t worry, Jeb will be a something to whatever it is you don’t like about those guys.
(I’m going to vote for a tin of tuna in 2016)
That won’t help…you’ll just get a TINO, packed in water…
And “control the climate” is a buzz-word, really meaning “control law-abiding citizens and take more of their money, whether they can afford it or not”.
I’m newby; almost fainted at the common sense expressed here.
The only peson in gOP with any chance is Rubio
person
Rubio will sabotage with amnesty. Anytime you find yourself co-sponsoring with McStain and Schumer you’ve run off the rails. Rand Paul actually will be able to bring some of his father’s contingent and a lot of the GOP mainstream. Not that Rand is the best candidate either. My personal favorite is Allen West. Maybe Ted Nugent for Veep.
And only Obama succeeded. he stopped the oceans from rising. /sarc.
Where has the donation button gone?
There were some technical issues, and I will put it back up when they get sorted, Thanks.
Romney talked both sides of the aisle, but his energy policy would have been drastically different, and far better then Obama’s. The universal bureaucratic nightmare in all fields of business which Obama has expanded with utter disregard for profit and effective management is stupendous In this area, as well as understanding of business costs and operations, Romney was diametrically different then Obama.
A Romney administration would have continued the fascist/corporatist system and its expansion. At best it would have favored somewhat different players than Obama’s but on a principle level it would have been little different.
Finally spells out an unstoppable coalition:
“Ralph Nader’s America: Impeach Obama, decriminalize drugs, libertarians & progressives unite!”
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/power-players-abc-news/ralph-naders-america-impeach-obama-decriminalize-drugs-libertarians-progressives-unite-110418813.html
If Ralph Nader & Lyndon LaRouche had a baby would it still be in favor of the impeachment of every Preznit ever?