Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Gender-responsive climate action”
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
Recent Comments
- Peter Carroll on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- arn on HUD Climate Advisor
- spren on HUD Climate Advisor
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Tel on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Petit_Barde on Ellen Flees To The UK
- dm on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
A house of parrots.
He said 5-10 years, so we all know it will be ice free by 2018! His predictions and models are always accurate.
IN 2018 it will be 2028. That is the way they go. Always moving the goal posts.
I have been compiling a list of ice-free prediction quotes ending in 2020. I have been trying to find an actual quote from him. I am trying to avoid journalists’ own interpretations so as not to be accused of not actually quoting Hansen but a journalist.
Hansen offered the best catastrophic prognosis that NASA could concoct at the time with the available talent and technology of the day.
🙂
/sarcoff
Is it OK to “deny” this claim?
VICE magazine, now partnered with HBO is pushing Greenland melting climate alarm today, comments included:
http://news.vice.com/articles/how-much-climate-change-denial-can-the-market-bear?trk_source=homepage-in-the-news
I could use some backup over there, guys! Only one of us has real facts to offer so far.
Non existent melting of Greenland ice is causing non existent sea level rise.
I gave it a whirl but I doubt if the brain dead are capable of hearing.
Sorry Nik,
but if folks want to stick their collective heads in a steel barrel and holler IPCC “climate science” alarm at each other until their brains are mush I have no interest in trying to stop them.
Further, I’ve never heard of vi-ce dot com and don’t think I want to.
Exactly why I had to take over. I just have more energy then that. Born that way, I guess.
I lobbed a shot or two at your foes. They’re not having all their own way.
Vice dot com are a bunch of young up and coming lefties that produce videos for youtube on subjects like; Tea party is racist and Gun crazy Murricans so, of course, they have the requisite leftard stance on “climate.”
…and since CAGW is supposed to affect the poles, why aren’t the alarmists predicting an Antarctic without sea ice? Just sayin’….
If proponents of the global warming hype were really, truly, sincerely, fearful of CO2 then they would embrace the lowest CO2 producing (zero), most concentrated energy source we have, nuclear. Only the wise men converts of their philosophy/ Gaea religion have recognized that truth. Unfortunately, human pride will not let them see that the devil they have been sold is really the angel of prosperity.
Interestingly Hansen has done exactly that. Renewables are not, to say the least, cutting it.
The BBC (Bias Broadcasting Corp.) says that renewables are the investment potential of the future –
“Anxious to invest in new energy forms, but not sure how to go about it? … to invest in renewable energy, each with its own cost and potential profits…”
http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20140106-renewable-energys-bright-future
Every year will be the warmest, so long as Dr. James “Thumbs On The Temperature Scale” Hansen and his band of homogenizers are permitted to “adjust” the data, while destroying the “raw” data.
It has become increasing obvious after over 17 years of no temperature increase, even while CO2 keeps increasing, that the Church Of Global Warming has run out of steam and now relies soley on fear and belief.
There is not one piece of empirical evidence linking human activities to the climate – NOT ONE. The only arguments for climate change besides the usual logical fallacies are anecdotes, computer projections, Hockey Sticks, and consensus.
* Anecdotes are short, obscure historical or biographical accounts. Anecdotes cannot be traced to one another. Anecdotes are not proof.
* Computer projections are Ludic fallacies based on dubious initial conditions. The computer projections have failed, because their only input is greenhouse gases. Computer projections are not proof.
* Hockey Sticks are the cobbling together of two unrelated proxy data sets. These FrankenGraphs, which would have received an “F” in Junior High School science class 50 years ago, are incredibly embraced by many scientists today. Hockey Sticks are artifical fabrications, not proof.
* Consensus is an opinion or position reached by a group as a whole. Millenia and centuries ago the consensus believed the Earth was the center of the Universe and Solar System. Consensus is not proof.
CO2 contributes nothing to the greenhouse effect after 400 ppm. Please find the tipping point here:
http://www.hyzercreek.com/log4%20copy.jpg
Consensus is ignorance with company.
Charles;
But, interestingly, anecdotes can be disproof. The exceptions that demolish the rule.
I think this is proof that the effects of brown acid don’t wear off, even after 40 years. Timothy Leary is waiting for you Jim.
Reblogged this on Climatism.
From Wikipedia:
If my calculations are correct, that’s a whopping 1.5 millimeters of sea level rise in a century, about the thickness of a fingernail.