Your Tax Dollars At Work Generating Fraudulent Data

Anthony Watts reports that the National Weather Service in Chicago says it is the coldest four months on record. This matches my calculations from HCN data.
It’s official – Chicago experienced the coldest four months ever on record

But NCDC data doesn’t show Illinois anywhere near record cold. Here is why. USHCN is doing a world’s record upwards adjustment in 2014, of nearly two degrees.

ScreenHunter_1266 Apr. 02 08.55

ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/v2.5/

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to Your Tax Dollars At Work Generating Fraudulent Data

  1. Shazaam says:

    OK, now how are they going to explain the Great Lakes ice?

    If they adjust the temperatures up enough that it wasn’t cold enough to freeze all the lakes, i.e. a nearly “average” winter….. How do they explain the record ice????

    And how do they explain the record natural gas consumption in the area?

    They can adjust and lie about the temperatures. All of the other supporting data (for the real, unadulterated low temperatures) is going to kick them in the tender parts for doing so.

    • Jason Calley says:

      “OK, now how are they going to explain the Great Lakes ice?
      How do they explain the record ice????
      And how do they explain the record natural gas consumption in the area? ”

      They won’t even try to explain. They will just release their lies and propaganda — and the CAGW enthusiasts will point to the fraudulent numbers and say, “SEE! This was nothing than a minor variation. The warming is still continuing.” If you disagree, then the CAGW crowd will point to the fraudulent releases and accuse you of being a conspiracy nut.

      These people are liars, and liars simply have to lie.

    • chris y says:

      “OK, now how are they going to explain the Great Lakes ice?”

      Ice-9.

      QED.

  2. That is some Herculean propaganda there.

  3. D. Self says:

    The government plays by a different set of rules. Private sector tampering would send your ass to jail.

    • Shazaam says:

      Yeah. Just imagine if the people decided to follow the government’s example and started adjusting their own tax rates as freely as government agencies adjust raw temperature data.

      Of course, the people, being rational, would be adjusting those taxes down at a staggering rate.

  4. tom0mason says:

    This effectively shows that the National Weather Service in Chicago, with the so called ‘climate scientists’, and all of the IPCC staff, are the real deniers, deniers of the observable evidence.

  5. -=NikFromNYC=- says:

    With CRU and NASA there were public faces to put on the data sets. Here? I still have no idea. That makes it hard to dig up any old quotes or activist bias to leverage into a compelling story. Also still unclear is how this series feeds into those others or not.

  6. talldave2 says:

    Seriously, wtf?

    How far can the divergence from proxies like Great Lakes ice extent and frost dates go before they lose all credibility? Does anyone even care at this point?

    Wow. Just wow.

    • Gail Combs says:

      We had six inches of snow february 11 and it was reported as above freezing with rain a couple days later. (Mid NC)

  7. Ben says:

    Steven,

    If you have time, would you breakout the adjustments by category?

    ie TOBS=0.5 + Yellow Ice adjustment = 1.1 + Sequestered cow farts = 0.4

    Thanks

  8. geran says:

    After the winter in most of US and Canada, a few words of encouragement for the Warmists:

    Kansas City will hit a high of at least 90F by August. (See–global warming.)

    Hang in there.

  9. NCDC seems to have located the center of the denial universe as the Chicago office of the National Weather Service. I’m sure the purge will be swift and decisive. The question is whether the IRS, CIA, or OFA will get the training points.

  10. Tel says:

    Working harder than ever!

    Not to worry, the more they do it, the less people will believe them.

  11. The Iconoclast says:

    FOIA request for the reasoning, methodology and code? It’s pretty brazen given, as Shazaam noted, record ice…

  12. Can’t you find a lawyer, or district attorney, who will take that graph to an appropriate judge, and get an arrest warrant, and maybe a cease-and-desist order against the NWS in Chicago? It cries out for immediate arrest of the felons and racketeers.

  13. elcrustace says:

    Despite Internet and an unlimited acces to historical news and datas, History is still being written by a handful of peoples. When I try to convince people that global warming theory is essentially a scam, they just can’t believe me. They can’t imagine that datas can be manipulated. For them, datas are truth. If you don’t trust the datas, you’re a denier ! A fool !

    Thank you Steve to expose this lies, day after day.

  14. D. Self says:

    This tampering move was desperate at the least. Now they are dissing the local meteorologists.

  15. omanuel says:

    Official stonewall responses to the Climategate emails that were released in Nov 2009, facilitated publication of an exposé of reliable experimental data that were hidden or ignored after the end of the Second World War:

    “A Journey to the Core of the Sun” – Chapter 2: Acceptance of Reality https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Chapter_2.pdf

  16. Anto says:

    No! Surely they didn’t do that?

  17. gator69 says:

    I’ll give up my raw data, when you pry my thermometer out of my cold dead hands.

  18. Brian H says:

    Good one, Gator!

    These adjustments build on each other, and require progressively more drastic fiddles, Each new one must show rise from the previously adjusted number, so the worse they get, the faster they get worse.

    • Gail Combs says:

      And after a while people notice that it snowed six inches while the national weather report shows above freezing and raining.

      I wonder how many others have noticed that happening this winter?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *