I hope you didn’t think I was referring to the weather.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- dm on Extreme Weather
- Mike on 70C At Lisbon
- Mike on Extreme Weather
- conrad ziefle on Extreme Weather
- Luigi on 70C At Lisbon
- Luigi on 70C At Lisbon
- Bob G on Extreme Weather
- arn on 70C At Lisbon
You sayin’ it wasn’t the cold weather that made Brazil play like they did?
A bit chilled indeed!
http://www.wunderground.com/global/stations/89828.html
Glad Argentina won. Here’s a new rule for the World Cup. If you played the previous game to a scoreless tie and win on penalty kicks, you can’t win the current game the same way – you’re eliminated after extra time. The exception of course is if you’re opponent is in the same situation. The rule would give some more incentive to try and score in extra time!
Better still, just eliminate extra time and go straight to penalties.
Argentina is a TEAM, and has players like Mascherano that put their hearts into it.
The brasilian team looked as if they were going to work, not to play