I hope you didn’t think I was referring to the weather.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on “Why Do You Resist?”
You sayin’ it wasn’t the cold weather that made Brazil play like they did?
A bit chilled indeed!
http://www.wunderground.com/global/stations/89828.html
Glad Argentina won. Here’s a new rule for the World Cup. If you played the previous game to a scoreless tie and win on penalty kicks, you can’t win the current game the same way – you’re eliminated after extra time. The exception of course is if you’re opponent is in the same situation. The rule would give some more incentive to try and score in extra time!
Better still, just eliminate extra time and go straight to penalties.
Argentina is a TEAM, and has players like Mascherano that put their hearts into it.
The brasilian team looked as if they were going to work, not to play