I hope you didn’t think I was referring to the weather.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- DD More on El Nino To The Rescue?
- Disillusioned on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Disillusioned on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- arn on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- arn on Is Antarctica Melting?
You sayin’ it wasn’t the cold weather that made Brazil play like they did?
A bit chilled indeed!
http://www.wunderground.com/global/stations/89828.html
Glad Argentina won. Here’s a new rule for the World Cup. If you played the previous game to a scoreless tie and win on penalty kicks, you can’t win the current game the same way – you’re eliminated after extra time. The exception of course is if you’re opponent is in the same situation. The rule would give some more incentive to try and score in extra time!
Better still, just eliminate extra time and go straight to penalties.
Argentina is a TEAM, and has players like Mascherano that put their hearts into it.
The brasilian team looked as if they were going to work, not to play