Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- arn on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Scott Allen on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- conrad ziefle on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- conrad ziefle on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
What?! Alarmists cherry picking data? How long has this been going on?
Stupid is as stupid does.
This is also why the US loses so many wars since WWII. All our victories turn to dust.
“The graph only begins in 1980, and consequently totally misses the point that the adjustments made at GHCN reduced temperatures from around the 1940’s to the 1960’s.”
That’s “Not Climate (Science)” for you; I expect they also have trouble tying their shoelaces because they cherry pick one end.
Homewood is getting very mainstream media traction, turning up all over the place.
It would appear that finally that cat is amongst the pigeons.