Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- conrad ziefle on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Robertvd on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Robertvd on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Robertvd on 65 Years Of Progress!
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
What?! Alarmists cherry picking data? How long has this been going on?
Stupid is as stupid does.
This is also why the US loses so many wars since WWII. All our victories turn to dust.
“The graph only begins in 1980, and consequently totally misses the point that the adjustments made at GHCN reduced temperatures from around the 1940’s to the 1960’s.”
That’s “Not Climate (Science)” for you; I expect they also have trouble tying their shoelaces because they cherry pick one end.
Homewood is getting very mainstream media traction, turning up all over the place.
It would appear that finally that cat is amongst the pigeons.