Government Scientists Continue To Ramp Up Their Criminal Activity Ahead Of Paris

By SETH BORENSTEIN  Nov. 22, 2015 10:51 AM EST

federal ground-based data, which scientists said is more reliable than satellites

AP FACT CHECK: Most GOP candidates flunk climate science

Ground data is more reliable than satellites? Consider Greenland. Satellites used millions of temperature readings in Greenland last month. NOAA used zero actual readings in Greenland.

201510

Global warming theory is based on troposphere temperatures which satellites measure, not urban heat islands and data tampering by criminals at NASA and NOAA.

NASA has known for 25 years that satellites are more accurate than surface temperatures, and that surface temperature measurements should be replaced.

B8YV6d7CEAA57DR

01 Apr 1990 – EARTHWEEK: A DIARY OF THE PLANET Global Warming

The same criminals who claim (when convenient) that surface temperatures are more accurate, also feel the need to massively adjust them (when convenient) – because of their gross inaccuracies.

2015-11-09-02-27-39

2001 version: Fig.A.ps
2015 version: Fig.A.gif

They can’t claim that surface temperatures are accurate, and then justify massive adjustments of surface temperatures.

The people behind this scam will engage in whatever tampering and lying is necessary to keep the White House happy.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Government Scientists Continue To Ramp Up Their Criminal Activity Ahead Of Paris

  1. Bill S says:

    Very nice.
    I wonder if those folks who look at satellite data consider themselves to be scientists?
    Then I have to wonder if the warmers are willing to admit same.
    And then I wonder what percentage of climate scientists study satellite date.
    Perchance 3%?

  2. oeman50 says:

    Excellent point, Tony. If the ground data are so accurate, why do they need constant adjustment, extrapolation and in-fills? Hmmm…

  3. KTM says:

    “NASA has known for 25 years that satellites are more accurate than surface temperatures, and that surface temperature measurements should be replaced.”

    Yes, I remember this distinctly. Especially in the late 90’s when satellite data jumped upward during the 1998 El Nino. The Warmists all clamored that the satellites were the only accurate measurement, that Climate Doom was upon us, and not to let the less robust surface warming lull us into a false sense of security.

    They were right in 1990, right in the late 90’s, but have done an about face now that the globe isn’t warming anymore and they have realized their unique ability to tamper with the surface records. Now the satellites and radiosondes must be ignored, because they say so.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *