The time has come for whistleblowers to come forward and expose climate fraud.
Guest post by Kent Clizbe. Government employees willing to tell the truth about climate can be handsomely rewarded.
- You can receive millions of dollars for doing the right thing. Blow the whistle! Some fraudulent research activities covered by the False Claims Act:
- Fabricating data
- Falsifying reports
- Making false statements on applications for grants
- Knowingly failing to comply with the conditions of the grant
- Using grant funds for personal, or other improper, purposes
- Knowingly failing to comply with federal regulations
- Now’s the time to speak up. The rewards for telling the truth about fraudulent research activities are considerable.
- The potential for retaliation for doing the right thing is less, with the new administration.
- Do you know details of how or why research fraud was committed? Contact me today
The federal government has a vigorous program to identify and prosecute fraudulent grant applications and administration–the False Claims Act. It provides rewards for insiders who reveal grant fraud.
As detailed daily on Real Science, it is clear that there is wide-spread fraud in “climate research.”
“Climate research” is a complex operation with multiple international players. With the massive sums of Federal grants (Michael Mann’s website lists more than $50 million in grants for his research alone) involved, there is a huge incentive for tight lips.
Like the mafia, or other criminal conspiracies, there seems to be a code of silence in the “climate research” community.
A researcher, or aspiring researcher, who is aware of inside information detailing fraudulent activity, would need a considerable incentive to come forward.
Luckily, the False Claims Act provides that incentive.
Insiders with knowledge of fraud are empowered to share their knowledge, and to share in rewards. The reward can be as much as 30% of the total amount reclaimed.
If you have details of fraud in climate research you can share in the rewards paid when the grant funds are recovered.
According to an attorney who specializes in FCA cases against universities and government research offices, including Educational/Research Grant Fraud: “Many institutions receive grants, whether for research or educational purposes. When they lie to get the grant or keep the grant or if they use the funds for purposes outside the grant, they are liable under [this] program. There have been many grant cases brought by whistleblowers.”
Here are some examples of common education institution fraudulent acts:
- Falsifying a grant application in order to secure a grant
- Falsifying research data and results
- Over-charging time, costs and other expenses associated with the grant
- Falsifying purchase orders for equipment and materials
- Using grant money for other unrelated research
- Using grant money for personal expenses
- Improper conflicts of interest by the principal investigators
- Falsifying progress reports and other documentation
- Failing to comply with applicable government safety and other regulations
If you know of anyone who might have details about fraudulent statements or actions by recipients of federal grant funds for climate research, please have them contact me immediately at the below email or cell phone.
All communications are completely confidential. They may want to consider using a third party email service (Yahoo, Hotmail, or other) instead of your work email to communicate. We will put you in contact with attorneys who specialize in False Claims Act suits. Your interests will be protected at all times.
Our country, and in fact, the entire world is counting on someone to stand up and tell the truth about climate research. The effects of moving forward with taxes and policies based on fraudulent science could potentially cripple the US economy and cost lives and jobs for generations.
I specialize in exposing frauds. See the article in the NY Times Sunday Magazine. It details my work that successfully exposed a 13 year, massively public fraud. Result: FBI arrested the fraudster, pled guilty, sentenced to prison.
Kent Clizbe
Fraud Detection Services
kent@kentclizbe.com
www.credibilityassurance.com
571 217 0714
Well Tony, I hope you get to be old and rich, but I wouldn’t recommend you start counting your money just yet. A couple years ago I would post that the good ship “Global Warming” had already sunk and all the noise was from the fools treading water who booked passage. I’ve since realized the ship is too big to sink. Well a lot depends on the results of Tuesday 8 November 2016.
I’ve said all along that the most likely way AGW theory will be junked is when new politicians take decision-making power. They will have NO previous form or association with AGW policies that will have cost billions, have no reputation to lose and so will be able to act objectively.
In the US, Trump is that person. I hope he pulls out all the stops against NASA/ GISS etc and nails their balls to the mast.
In the UK, Mrs May isn’t that person as she’s partly tainted by association with Cameron’s ‘greenest government ever’.
The only other way is if a high-level scientist / AGW insider turns states evidence.
Yeah, right. Don’t forget any high placed whistleblower faces possible arkancide if Hitlery is in charge. So far between 50 and 60 people have conveniently died.
Trump is the only possibility for the rule of law to prevail.
Her chief advisor, Nick Timothy is I believe on record as wanting the Climate Act repealed – there’s a GWPF press release applauding same…
There’s no doubt the current cAGW/CC scare was and remains a political construct. Trouble is, there’s been such a deliberate wholescale corruptive un-holy alliance between governance, big bizz, academia and NGO’s that truth qv. ‘reality’ no longer matters. I’ll bet you that a great majority of so-called ‘clim-science’ folks and their attendant bourgeoisie lie uneasily in their beds, quaking for no shakedown.
For the record, here (Scotland), we’re signed-up for zero nuclear generation capability from 2025. We’ve already lost coal-fired as per the EU’s diktated LCPD, and gas investment is precisely zero, and even the prospect of fraccing is moratoried. Over the last three years, Scotland imported electricity 134 times; last time that happened it was the 1920’s.
And this from an oil-producing nation with deserved aspirations towards sovereignty? Clue here: don’t f**k about with a nation’s energy security.
https://books.google.ca/books?id=LjhtdMmJdQMC&pg=PA63&lpg=PA63&dq=smelling+land+the+gods+of+energy&source=bl&ots=SxKskHs-Jd&sig=krCguTtc_9AYbElhjlvK9kf22qA&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=smelling%20land%20the%20gods%20of%20energy&f=false
Awesome!!
Do it.. everyone needs the #Truth
But if they would do so, just think, all the fines, grant money clawed back, etc. President Trump Could re-imburse the whistle blowers and still have enough left to finance the building of a wall on both the Northerm and Southern Borders.
BeeGee2
Oops, fingers didn’t keep up with the brain, should be spelled Northern.
BeeGee2
I just discovered that somebody has tampered with Google Earth to prevent anyone from inspecting firn lines on glaciers and ice caps! To do that , they had to find every picture of every bit of glacial ice on the planet, including all the “historical” pictures from past years, and replace them with pictures that showed only new fallen snow, pictures that had been “digitally blurred”, and pictures that just started blurry and stayed that way!!! There is no snow any place else on Google Earth, except for a few mountain tops. Satellites and planes that take pictures of the Earth do not just do so on one day each year! They do it all year, and the people who put together the mosaic that is Google Earth, pick out the best pictures they have, of every other place on the planet. They are from all different times of the year, since a winter shot, with no leaves on the trees, may be the best shot of what is in some areas, but all pictures with snow on the ground fail to make the cut! When you click on the little blue rectangle at the bottom of the screen, you will will get a selection of dates, going back as far as thirty three years, that you can click on to see pictures taken on that date. All of those pictures are good! If, however, you try this when you are trying to see glacial ice, you will fin that all of the “Historical” pictures taken of glacial ice were taken on December 31, for EVERY SINGLE YEAR!!! Taking pictures on December 31 insures that snow of the new winter is already lying on top of the firn, preventing anybody from knowing the altitude of it’s lowest point!!! In the southern hemisphere, all “historical” pictures are also dated as having been made on 12/31 of the year in which each picture was made! How can this be? The pictures in use in the current year are not taken on 12/31, so do they BECOME pictures taken on 12/31 as they grow older? These “historicals” are also worthless, because 12/31 is the start of the warm season, and to early for anything to have started to melt! What a person needs to see, if they want to know about climate trends, is how much snow melted in each year ,by the end of the melting season, just before the snow of the next winter fell on the firn, or leftover snow of the previous winter! On Google Earth, the altitude of the point under your cursor is displayed at the bottom of your screen, and when you put it on the division between the clean white firn, and the dusty old ice that is exposed as the firn melts, that is the firn line, and if the planet is warming, the melting will go to higher altitude with each year. If the climate is cooling, the melting will stop at a lower altitude each year. Since Google Earth is free, and the ability of any person to look for themselves and see if there is a change in the altitude of the firn line from one year to the next, would be the best way for any person to find out what the truth is, this brazen effort to prevent anybody from seeing the firn line, ANY PLACE ON THE PLANET, shows that climate alarmists have something to hide!!! If the glaciers and ice caps were rapidly melting, would they not want us to see proof?? The concealment of the best evidence is proof of the lie!!! They do not conceal the bottom end of the glacier, but that is because most people wrongly think that melting of the tongue of the glacier is proof of something. All glaciers are formed at high altitudes, where it is too cold for all of the winter snow to all melt in the summer, and when they become thick enough, they flow like a river down hill to warmer altitudes where they must either melt, or flow into the sea. Their rate of movement is not uniform, and neither is their rate of melting! both can be affected by various factors, but the state of the firn is a valid indicator of a glacier’s future! Try to see what the firn has been doing on some ice cap, from one year to the next, for the last 20 or 30 years, by looking on Google Earth, and you will find out for your self what kind of people say “there is global warming”!
From the NYT article:
“In the government’s extensive rap sheet on Simmons, the picture that emerges is not of a cynical fraudster but of a man living in a fiction of his own creation”
Sounds a lot like the people Tony has been exposing, here.
Sounds like the same sort of excuse Comey used to say Clinton should be NOT be prosecuted. This despite the fact intent is not required in the applicable law.
Trying to rationalize criminal behavior.
I think the EPA itself should be reported – I believe there is good reason to believe they are guilty of
“Falsifying a grant application in order to secure a grant
Falsifying research data and results
Over-charging time, costs and other expenses associated with the grant
Falsifying purchase orders for equipment and materials
Using grant money for other unrelated research
Using grant money for personal expenses
Improper conflicts of interest by the principal investigators
Falsifying progress reports and other documentation
Failing to comply with applicable government safety and other regulations”
Not to mention the sexual harassment they allow to go on unabated.
There is an “Inspector General” for all government divisions, including the EPA. A little like the fox watching the hen house if you ask me.
If Hillary wins, any potential whistleblower would be spitting in the wind. Even worse, would probably be subjected to harassment and retaliation. She has already said that she wants “deniers” to be prosecuted.
Assuming that Trump wins and is sincere, let the feeding frenzy begin!
Perhaps sceptics could start a collection for those individuals that speaks out?
See what happends ?
If the highest levels of government and its bureaucrats and its supporters all say the earth is flat then a grant submission to study “how flat is the earth” will never be considered fraud. How long will it take to change all this.
This hoax will never end. Agency spending is like a perpetual motion machine. The US is still in the Helium business long after blimp warfare went away.
We know that spending and CO2 levels will continue to grow. My question is, how will the spenders reconcile with rising CO2 levels with the lack of catastrophic climate change? Can they claim they saved the world and that we should ignore the CO2 levels?
I think it might have been Naomi Oreskes that made that claim. I read it about a year ago on Climate Depot. Obviously, the climate gravy train either took no notice or was bolstered by it.
World demand for helium is rising sharply while US helium reserves are rapidly depleting. It is required now for MRIs, superconductors, Cern’s Hadron collider etc. And that is why several Helium extraction companies have relocated to western Canada where there is substantial helium in their nat gas wells to make good money… All that is needed is 0.2 to 0.4% helium in the raw nat gas stream to make a profit…..
The social costs are staggering from a simple mathematical error in the definition of nuclear binding energy eighty years (1936-2016) ago:
http://www.journalijar.com/article/11650/neutron-repulsion–social-costs-from-overlooking-this-power/
That error is the slope in the baseline for calculating nuclear binding energies, shown across the top of Figure 2.
My former student, Golden Hwaung, and I were writing a note on solar cosmic rays this weekend and uncovered this 1998 report by The Millennium Group:
http://www.tmgnow.com/repository/solar/cosmicrays.html
TMG was informed that we agree with their 1998 report.
I refer you to a letter to Nature entitled “Evidence for Solar Particle Production Above ~75 GeV” by SW Schindler and PD Kearney (Nature, Vol 237, No 5357 pp503-505, June 30, 1972)
The detector was a narrow angle (~ 7 cm(sq) sr) muon telescope located about 200 meters water equivalent (vertical) underground on a solar tracking telescope mount. The apparatus as located in the Colorado School of Mines Experimental Mine located in Idaho Springs, Colorado. On October 3, 1971 two groups of at least 3 muons per group, separated by 9 minutes, traversed the geometry of the detector. The background rate for a single traversal at that event orientation was calculated to be ~ 1.7 counts per hour. The group traversals were well correlated with a substantial flare recorded by instruments in Boulder, the Canary Islands and the Vela satellites.
I refer you to a letter to Nature entitled “Evidence for Solar Particle Production Above ~75 GeV” by SW Schindler and PD Kearney (Nature, Vol 237, No 5357 pp503-505, June 30, 1972)
The detector was a narrow angle (~ 7 cm(sq) sr) muon telescope located about 200 meters water equivalent (vertical) underground on a solar tracking telescope mount. The apparatus as located in the Colorado School of Mines Experimental Mine located in Idaho Springs, Colorado. On October 3, 1971 two groups of at least 3 muons per group, separated by 9 minutes, traversed the geometry of the detector. The background rate for a single traversal at that event orientation was calculated to be ~ 1.7 counts per hour. The group traversals were well correlated with a substantial solar flare recorded by instruments in Boulder, the Canary Islands and the Vela satellites.
Thanks, Philip.
I will forward that link to my former student. There is no doubt in my mind that cosmic rays come from the Sun, but I am getting too old and tired for this battle.
Society was isolated from reality eighty years ago by an error in the definition of “nuclear binding energy.” The slope of the baseline across the top of Figure 2 shows the exact bias in the Bethe-Weizsacker’s definition of nuclear binding energy:
http://www.journalijar.com/article/11650/neutron-repulsion–social-costs-from-overlooking-this-power/
The Mann act says you can’t transport climate fraud across state lines.
Off topic
But http://www.john-daly.com/ is now gone, but on wayback you will stil find it. Maybee look here before that to is gone? He has some interesting data? http://web.archive.org/web/20151202005315/http://www.john-daly.com/stations/cet-1659.gif
The header for this article suggests that the whistleblower needs to be a “government employee”. I don’t think so. It could be someone outside government too — for example, a research assistant at an institution receiving government grants. That’s a big difference, and makes the law more likely to uncover misuse of grant money — and a bigger inducement to people who see improper conduct.
DC,
You’re right, of course.
It would better read “government contractor.”
The most important point is that those insiders with evidence of fraud have an incentive (besides truth, justice, and the American way) to provide details of Federal research grant fraud.
Those who blow the whistle do so at great cost to themselves and their families. The potential to share in the monetary claw-backs from the fraudsters helps to mitigate those costs somewhat.
Share this article with every academic you know. Email the link to every climate researcher. Spread the word.
No Pressure
https://youtu.be/sE3g0i2rz4w
The evidence is in the data. Its a bit of work but I’ll put it together to show that conclusively that data is made up.
Not conclusive but this is a start. Notice the change in hemispheres from v2 to v3.
http://woodfortrees.org/graph/hadsst2nh/mean:60/plot/hadsst2sh/mean:60/plot/hadsst3nh/mean:60/plot/hadsst3sh/mean:60
Considering the cock up, how likely is that the big changes between 1940 and 1975 were real?
Thank you, Kent Clibze, for this post. Society now faces a major decision. Shall we:
1. Accept reality, as revealed by precise measurements and observations on mass (m) and energy (E) by Albert Einstein in 1905 and Francis William Aston in 1922, or
2. Be enslaved by Carl von Weizsacker’s (1935) and Hans Bethe’s (1936) false model of nuclear binding energy that hid neutron repulsion, the source of energy that powers the Sun and the cosmos.
There is no third option. Reality vs. Enslavement is the issue in the AGW debate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58MEotH79rg
My late research mentor, P.K. Kuroda (1917-2001) deserves credit for noticing and reporting the misunderstanding of Aston’s lecture on nuclear energy at the Imperial University of Tokyo on 13 June 1936. Kuroda reported the misunderstanding of nuclear energy on pages 5-8 of his 1992 autobiography. That misunderstanding of nuclear energy is illustrated by the sloping baseline across the top of Figure 2:
http://www.journalijar.com/article/11650/neutron-repulsion–social-costs-from-overlooking-this-power/
Thank you, Kent Clizbe
See one-page summary on “Energy in the Solar System“
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Frankly.pdf
@Oliver.
Mate, this thread is a very specific one. It could even stimulate action from a whistleblower who shuts down the entire fraudulent racket of AGW. It could be seminal. Without wishing to piss on your nuclear chips could you post that theory of yours elsewhere? Ta.
NEWS FLASH !
Ex-President Barack Insane Obama made his last gasp to seal Global Climate Change narrative by having the United States Military spray “Tony-the-Tiger” Frosted Flakes (Which in fact are colored “White” (Which also in fact is “evidence” of Racial “overtones” when in fact Tony-the-Tiger has “Black” stripes on his coat of which are fairly evident) over the entire Arctic while hiding the real “truth” that in fact there is no more Arctic Ice in that the Ice both melted and then evaporated causing the recent extreme Winter and Weather events along the U.S. West Coast and Canada !
Additionally, and specifically for Frosted Flakes Fans, “currently” there is a Frosted Flakes buffet of EPIC PROPORTIONS “if” you can just get to a Latitude of no less than 66°33 North Latitude which is also the Southern most point of the Arctic Circle !
Additionally, these Tony-the-Tiger Frosted Flakes need “no” additional salt or sugars because of the Arctic Sea (Ocean) which “perfectly”applied the “exact” amount of seasoning so bring only your Vitamin “D” milk (Low-Fat preferred, you will find an abundance of calories in the Frosted Flakes alone so their is “no” reason to push the limit (This dietary advice marked here was provided to you by “Ex”- First Lady Michelle Obama which through extremely difficult exercise routines has in fact lowered her weight to less than [ 400lbs ] for the first time since her weight “exceeded” “666lbs” which occurred less than “1” year after moving into the White House!).
WARNING THE SHEET OF “FROSTED” FLAKES WILL “NOT” LAST LONG SO PLEASE GET HERE WHILE THE GOING IS GOOD !!!
I have in fact provided you with a very recent Satellite Image from today, January 28, 2017, disclosing the extent of the now “Tony-the-Tiger” Frosted Flakes Pseudo Ice Sheet covering the Arctic !
Thank You and enjoy (If you can get there?) your Frosted Flakes Buffet…
Frosted Flakes is Kellogs…
#DumpKelloggs: Breakfast Brand Blacklists Breitbart, Declares Hate for 45,000,000 Readers
New York Post: Breitbart Causes Kellogg’s Stock to Drop “Kellogg’s stock has fallen 3.6 percent in the last two days in part because of the Breitbart brouhaha.”
So Kelloggs had to con Obummer into using Frosted Flakes to shore-up their stock prices.
There is also this little gem from Larry @ chiefio’s site
https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2017/01/26/week-one-of-1-a-t/#comment-78350
Larry is really great at digging up gems like that.
Lots of great info/pointers gets published over there.
Hide the Decline Revisited…
In the following 2009 email a warmist said he would like to tamper with the data to hide a previous cooling (a decline). And then the “scientists” (leftist activists) did just that. That is fraud.
ClimateGate email from warmist Tom Wigley to Phil Jones and Ben Santer:
2009: Phil, … if you look at the attached plot you will see that the land also shows the 1940s blip. So, if we could reduce the ocean blip by, say, 0.15 degC, then this would be significant for the global mean… http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2011/12/climategate-email-warmist-tom-wigley.html
Indeed, they did not simply “hide the decline.” Mann et al did not merely delete data after 1960, they deleted data from 1940 on. You can see the last point of the Briffa reconstruction (located at ~1940) peeking from behind the spaghetti in the graphic below.
Had Mann et al used the actual values, the decline would have been as shown with the orange line in the accompanying graphic (a hockey stick decline instead of a hockey stick incline!!!!):
Its time Google ect stopped favoring AGW news stories and vetting, banning or censoring skeptical views ect.
Okay…. how is this project doing so far? 170 years of scientists studying human-caused climate change, and still no sign of fraud. How much longer must you clowns keep us waiting for evidence showing the scientists are #1 wrong and/or #2 committing fraud?
Moron alert
… no sign of fraud…
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
-John Heywood, 1546
Self imposed ignorance has no cure.
The fraud is rampant.
Please restate your point.
Mr. Phile,
Thanks very much for your perspicacious insights.
Here’s an analogy that is quite apropos to the climate cabal:
Bernie Madoff was as respected, prosperous, visible, influential member of the investment community for decades. He aggressively attacked any “deniers” who questioned his impossible investment results. There was “no sign of fraud.”
Until………an insider whistleblower provided details to authorities. Once the authorities had that insider knowledge and insight, they were able to expose the entire sordid stinking mess of Madoff’s massive, decades-long fraudulent enterprise.
Just like a closely-held family fraud, like the Madoffs, or a crime family like the Mafia, the climate cabal has a code of silence. Breaking that code is almost the only way to get at the truth. Climate-gate emails provide a tiny glimpse into the conspiracy. An insider whistleblower will pull the curtain away completely to expose the fraud and the fraudsters.
Will leave you with a nugget of investigatory wisdom:
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Don’t worry, one of them will come forward, and likely soon.
Please share these details with all the climate researchers you know.
Thanks.
Kent
Just happened Kent!
!http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html#ixzz4XlWgDL48
Forest Trees
Try this fool…. 04/Feb/2017
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html#ixzz4XlWgDL48
Leave those tortoise and jack rabbits along Desertphile.
Related, but this is now a settled case.
Is there a list of green energy scams?
Here is another:
Millions of gallons of fuel = False!
From Richland, WA in south central Washington State.
KEN , perhaps you should talk to Milo Yiannopoulos , before his career as an anti left gay rights speaker , he was an Oxford grad and worked for climate related NGO’S , he sometimes talks about the data fraud and manipulation that he witnessed first hand , so could be a good source of info for you , here he is in a short video talking about his experience’s with his NGO and the IPCC ; https://youtu.be/RMVkyfOdfD0
UN Official Admits Global Warming Agenda Really About Destroying Capitalism
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-03/un-official-admits-global-warming-agenda-really-about-destroying-capitalism
Strange that a quote from 2 years ago has resurfaced – was no one listening before ?
http://www.unric.org/en/latest-un-buzz/29623-figueres-first-time-the-world-economy-is-transformed-intentionally
It’s about time. There are plenty of examples of professional misconduct.
Climate Bullies Gone Wild; Caught on Tape and Print
https://co2islife.wordpress.com/2017/01/22/climate-bullies-gone-wild-caught-on-tape-and-print/
Climate “Science” on Trial; The Smoking Gun Files
https://co2islife.wordpress.com/2017/01/17/climate-science-on-trial-the-smoking-gun-files/
NEW FLASH!….This may finally have come to pass?….
Climate Insider blows the whistle on Karl, et. al.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html#ixzz4XlWgDL48
Climate “Science” on Trial; Eisenhower Warned Us About Climate Scientists
https://co2islife.wordpress.com/2017/02/09/climate-science-on-trial-eisenhower-warned-us-about-climate-scientists/
Tony,
This person posted this http://www.factcheck.org/2017/01/tillerson-on-climate-change/ and this http://www.factcheck.org/2017/02/no-data-manipulation-at-noaa/ as FACT CHECKS ??? but when you read it she does not even try to present a balanced unbiased comment, rather she appears to go out of her way to present one side!!
Hmmm I think she could use a good dose of reality – Tony style !!
Fact Check Org
Study Finds Fact Checkers Biased Against Republicans.
FactCheck.org – Yet another source of leftist false info
Gail, YOU should create a new fact check site !
Google banned me over a year ago.
Now I can only comment on a couple of sites. Seems that Google does not like anyone who distributes the truth.
Doublespeak.
First they claim no manipulation, then they admit to adjusting the data. Hand-waving at its best.
Here is the lawsuit already laid out and ready to go. If there is any justice left in this world, this should be an open and shut case.
Climate Science Behaving Badly; 50 Shades of Green & The Torture Timeline
https://co2islife.wordpress.com/2017/02/12/climate-science-behaving-badly-50-shades-of-green-the-torture-timeline/
It seems that our most brilliant scientists have a very short memory. The global warming began when the glaciers started to melt. If they would just look back a a few hundred centuries, better then half the world was covered in glaciers. Where are the glaciers now?
The “ice age” probably began with a collision with the earth by a cosmic body which spewed dust and vapor into the atmosphere and blocked out the sun. This dust and vapor could possibly have caused a large amount of snow to fall and the dust prevented the sun’s heat from reaching the earth. The snow would have reflected whatever heat reached the earth back up into the atmosphere. Gradually the atmosphere began to clear and as more heat reached the earth the glaciers began to melt, and as more earth began to be exposed to the sun the more it retained the heat during the winter and less snow fell. One must remember that the earth was once almost a jungle (fossils of great dinosaurs whose primary food were plants) and these same fossil fuels that we are harvesting today and (blaming on global warming) were formed. The global warming will continue no matter what we mere human beings try to do to prevent it. Twenty years ago the the Northwest passage was frozen over. Today ships , with the help of ice breakers can navigate the northwest passage almost all year round. Mark my words global warming will continue until the earth is once again a jungle type planet, barring any further catastrophies
Person who must be held legally accountable for massive AGW fraud costing billions of dollars in losses worlwide
1. Mr Michael Mann refer Climate audit investigations
2. Mr Gavin Schmidt refer climategate
3. Mr Phil Jones Univerity of East Anglia refer climate gate 1
None of the above deserve to have a DR in front of their names. They have done a massive disservice to Science and will always be remenbered in posterity as a fraud. Any Journal or organization associated with these persons will also be held accountable eventually mark my words.
speaking of which, has anyone heard how the shukla investigation is going ?
Pass this article on to the lawyer mentioned in the article. It is a ready-made lawsuit that uses the computer models as evidence AGAINST the climate alarmists.
Climate “Science” on Trial; The Criminal Case Against the Alarmists
https://co2islife.wordpress.com/2017/02/21/climate-science-on-trial-the-criminal-case-against-the-alarmists/
Tony, I just posted the following message over on WUWT. Do you have a link to any data that may apply?. I’d like to run a regression against Temperature. The results would help bolster a lawsuit. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Mr. Watts, I may have a great project for your Blog. The IPCC Models provide the evidence to shoot down the AGW Theory. The IPCC Models most likely have a very very very low R-Squared, that is why they never publish the R-Squared of the models. You can host a project to beat the IPCC Climate Model R-Squareds. All you would need to do is create a repository for valid climate data. Dr. Spencer and Christy could provide the Satellite Data, Dr. Willie Soon could provide the solar data, someone else could provide the data for El Ninos and Ninas, others could provide data for clouds, albido, etc etc. The CO2 data is readily available. Once all the data sets are collected, multivariable regressions could be run on the data to identify the most significant variables, as well as establishing the R-Squared for the Temp=f(CO2) model. Once that data is collected, and the models run, it would provide great evidence for a court case. The Climate Alarmists would have to defend why a bunch of bloggers were able to create a climate model with a much higher R-Squared than the IPCC was able to do after spending billion of dollars. The models are the key to debunking this nonsense, and your website as the ability to reach the people that are needed to pull this off.
Here is a more detailed explanation of the project.
Climate “Science” on Trial; The Criminal Case Against the Alarmists
https://co2islife.wordpress.com/2017/02/21/climate-science-on-trial-the-criminal-case-against-the-alarmists/
I LOVE that picture….
Hey
I would like to tell you of my latest book, “Human Caused Global Warming”.
‘The Biggest Deception in History’.
Available on ‘Amazon.ca’.
http://www.drtimball.com
Thank you Dr Ball.
I nominate Dr. Tim Ball for the Whistleblowers Award, and the late Professor Paul K. Kuroda (1917-2001) for posthumous recognition of worldwide abuse of science after WWII to deceive humanity.
Fear of possible worldwide nuclear annihilation convinced frightened world leaders to unite all nations and national Academies of Sciences under the UN on 24 OCT 1945 to hide the source of energy in atomic bombs from the public
That meant, in simple layman’s terms, they had to hide the fact that, the whole universe is alive and breaths because every atom in it is made of reversibly, interchangeable ELECTRON-PROTON PAIRS, that we call:
1. NEUTRONS when compressed
2. HYDROGEN when expanded
An extremely talented genius, born 28 years earlier in the “cherry blossom season” of 1917, Paul Kazuo Kuroda (1917-2001), risked his life to save humanity from slavery by:
3. SECRETLY copying the A-bomb design;
4. PUBLICLY reporting that a nuclear physicist did NOT UNDERSTAND NUCLEAR ENERGY in his autobiography.
http://www.omatumr.com/abstracts2005/PKKAutobiography.pdf
Thanks, Tony, for your help in getting out a message of hope for our troubled society.
LOGIC was a major asset in physics, until they (physicists) encountered the strongest emotion – FEAR – on observing the ruins of Hiroshima in AUG 1945 and reconsidered the warning in the last paragraph of Aston’s Nobel Lecture in DEC 1922.
Physicists had met the “Power of God“ and saw only destructive evil.
A 28-year old nuclear geo- chemist from the Imperial University of Tokyo – Dr. Kazuo Kuroda – examined the ruins of Hiroshima in AUG 1945 and recognized also the “Power of Creation.”
Kuroda’s story was published in his 1982 book, “Synthesis of the Chemical Elements and the Oklo Phenomenon,” after Kuroda came to the United States and acquired a new Christian first name, Paul.
My understanding of Kuroda’s message has been rewritten and will hopefully be published in time to celebrate the Centennial of Kuroda’s birth on 1 April 2017.
“The Universe Is In Good Hands“ aka “There Is A God.”
The goals of modern physics are explained in this description of the Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker Society, pages 173-189:
http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-03668-7
Is the data set of the GISS version 2000 available through the Internet? I would like to have the original source of the data.
Actually it would be nice to have the same information also for the GISS version 2010.
Dear friends,
KURODA DAY CELEBRATION
To celebrate KURODA DAY on the Centennial birth of Paul Kazuo Kuroda (1 April 1917 – 17 April 2001), this preprint that explains how an unholy alliance of the UN and the NAS has ruled the world by deceit since nations and national academies of sciences were united under the UN on 24 Oct 1945.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/HIGHER-POWERX.pdf
Kuroda secretly kept a personal copy of Japan’s design for atomic bombs because he already knew the source of energy in atomic bombs is the one that birthed the solar system and still sustains the Sun and our lives today.
The above document may help President Trump end seventy-one years by organizers of the “March for Science” in Washington, DC next month, . . . . .
if we get the message to Trump.
My contact information is below.
With kind regards.
~ Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
PhD Nuclear Chemistry
Postdoc Space Physics
Fulbright Astrophysics
1-573-647-1377
The paper is now published:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/HIGHER-POWERZ.pdf
KURODA DAY CELEBRATION
To celebrate KURODA DAY on the Centennial birth of Paul Kazuo Kuroda (1 April 1917 – 17 April 2001), this preprint that explains how an unholy alliance of the UN and the NAS has ruled the world by deceit since nations and national academies of sciences were united under the UN on 24 Oct 1945.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/HIGHER-POWERX.pdf
Kuroda secretly kept a personal copy of Japan’s design for atomic bombs because he already knew the source of energy in atomic bombs is the one that birthed the solar system and still sustains the Sun and our lives today.
The above document may help President Trump end seventy-one years by organizers of the “March for Science” in Washington, DC next month, . . . . .
if we get the message to Trump.
My contact information is below.
With kind regards.
~ Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
PhD Nuclear Chemistry
Postdoc Space Physics
Fulbright Astrophysics
1-573-647-1377
The paper, “The Univere Is In Good Hands,” aka “There Is A God” shows exactly how science was misused after WWII to rule the world by deceit.
The paper was accepted for publication on 1 April 2017, the Centennial of Professor Paul Kazuo Kuroda’s birth on 1 April 1917.
The conclusion is the same as ancient songs of praise to a Power Greater than Big Brother, long before government science was manipulated to generate false, 97% consensus scientific evidence for imminent danger from AGW, etc.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?google_comment_id=z135ybkxktv4y3wuj23kdbxo0l3wfvkbe04&v=h5D3LEjGF8A
The published paper is here:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/HIGHER-POWERZ.pdf
CONCLUSION: “This paper is meant to be suggestive only.”
“We are at the beginning of a new awakening to reality and know only a little.”
“More will be revealed if we selflessly practice the basic principles of science for the benefit of humanity,”
“as exemplified by the life and career of Paul Kazuo Kuroda.”
Real science will be our path back from darkness into sunlight.
Here’s a one-page summary, “The Rise & Fall of Science and Democracy”
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/The_Rise_and_Fall_of_Science.pdf
This updated version better shows P.K. Kuroda’s role in defeating world tyranny:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/The_Rise-Fall_of_Science-Democracy.pdf