How To End The NFL Protests

We could end the NFL social justice protests by simply making it illegal for the police to approach anyone who wears a hoodie, or has their pants hanging halfway down their ass.

baltimore-riots-1

In the NFL, you get praised for trashing your flag and country, but you get fined if you disrespect the league, a coach, a referee or a league official.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to How To End The NFL Protests

  1. Jack Striker says:

    We could also end them by returning to a global system of ethnically homogeneous nations, but one step at a time.

  2. Rud Istvan says:

    Went through a similar experience during the ‘Students for a Democratic Society’ riots in Boston 1969 concerning Vietnam. Was coming home from a long wet sailing practice at the MIT Charles River Pavillion, and noticed things on the Red Line to Harvard Square ( then a $quarter)–obvious nonstudents with backpacks. That night they packed Lowell Lec, and so did we. 1100 people before SRO). Three straight votes NOT to occupy University Hall, admin cental in Harvard Yard. We students went home at 0100 after the third no vote. At 0200 the non-student thugs occupied U Hall anyway. Massachusetts called out state police and National Guard, and by shortly after dawn all the miscreants had been apprehended but with ugglies published in Life Magazine. I was at that time a freshman on full Army Scholarhip alternative to West Point supers appointment, and took about 150 pictures of the events. Donated those recently to Harvard (keeping copies, of course) but doubt they will ever see the light of day. And, doubt because of the Naomi Oreskes hire that Harvard will ever see another financial contribution. Been there, done that. Never again. Neimals.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Right after the Kent State riots my university had a big riot. Just ask NBC, CBS, ABC… they showed film footage of the riots on the 6:00 news.

      My parents living three states away called me in a panic. Only problem was I was on campus from 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM and there were no riots. NOTHING. Heck we were a very conservative engineering/Ag school.

      What was interesting is my roomie called her parents living a few towns away and they never saw the film of the riots.

      Also there is ZERO about this ‘Riot’ in the history of the University although there is a whole page about the Vietnam war time period.

      That is when I decided the MSM was nothing but propaganda.

  3. Latitude says:

    It has nothing to do with race…
    …it’s culture

    They have established their own gangsta hip hop culture….drugs, guns, and a trail of babies…and it’s been promoted by multi-millionaire black entertainers…who are still stirring it up because it makes them money

    • Jimmy Haigh says:

      And don’t forget the rich – some of them extremely rich – white guys who are also in on it.

    • Jack Striker says:

      It has nothing to do with race… …it’s culture

      You’re only partially right. While the negro community of the United States has been completely overtaken by your list of things–you’re not wrong about that–and while their previous culture was one of respectability and progress in the face of adversity, the very concept of culture is inherently derived from race.

      Genetic differences are both physiological and psychological. Environments breed genetic differences and, necessarily, different responses to living therein. Culture is the expression of your group’s personal genetics within a given environment. Let’s look at monogamy vs. polygamy.

      Monogamy is how a society encourages the weakest males to be productive, since it ensures they’ll be able to find a mate. Another argument you can use is that polygamy brings about social instability. Due to the fact that older, richer, more established men grab all the women, it means that the search for a mate among the younger males is all the more desperate, and violent.

      Polygamous societies are inherently unstable, prone to great social unrest from the younger men that cannot find a woman. Now, this is fine and dandy if you want to motivate those men to join the army and go conquer someplace else and steal their women, as well as the fact that war attrition will get rid of plenty of those young men, but once your empire has expanded as much as it can the same problems crop up, but this time with no possible outside outlet.

      It is no coincidence that enduring civilizations made the switch from polygamy to monogamy over the course of their history, and I highly suspect the troubles Arab civilizations faced around the 14th and 15th century were in large part caused by their reliance on polygamy.

      You can argue that current Arab societies are what they are because of polygamy. Women are a rare commodity that are fiercely guarded, hence the restrictions placed on their behavior and the need to have a male relative escort them when they are out, lest they be stolen by some other family. The high level of inbreeding could also be part of this, with a family trying to keep all the wealth and power among themselves.

      Numerous studies show that male behavior is heavily influenced by the operational sex ratio–or the ratio between fertile females and sexually active males. If male and female numbers are equal then the best strategy is for a male to find a female, pair off, and protect/provide for his own kids.

      If there are more fertile females than males, the best mating strategy for males is to put less resources caring for their kids and more resources trying to mate with multiple females. (note l: urban blacks in America fall into this category because of the amount of young black males either in prison or killed by other black males. result is that black males spend more time chasing other women and less time being fathers) (note 2: possibly bigamy became common in these societies to prevent the excess of available females from encouraging men to sleep around instead of be fathers)

      If there are more males than females, the males that have mates get obsessed with protecting them from the surplus males, who form rape gangs to try to get access to the smaller numbers of females.

      In polygamous societies, every man that has two wives creates a man who can never mate unless he rapes. Bigamy effectively turns a balanced operational sex ratio into a heavily male-biased one. Islam is a codified set of behaviors for protecting females from rape gangs (burka, can’t go outside without male guardian) and exporting the surplus males to neighboring societies so they don’t bother the local females (jihad). That is, essentially, Islam–a code of behaviors designed by a guy with multiple wives in a bigamous society to keep womanless men away from his wives.

      The surplus males generated by bigamy are told, “These women are off-limits; they’re spoken for by more powerful men in your society. If you want to get laid, your only option is to go out and conquer something and take their women.” This is how Islam spread so quickly in its first few centuries and this is the driving force behind the huge amount of young men flooding into Europe today. They are not refugees, they are sex tourists. It should be no surprise they are so rapey.

      Short version: you’re not wrong, just not 100% right. The “culture” (can it really be called that?) you describe was partially forced on them, partially willingly accepted by them. And there’s a reason for that.

  4. nigelf says:

    Going back to the good old days and busting some skulls with police batons would work too.

  5. Pathway says:

    They may look like Obama’s sons.

    • Jack Striker says:

      “If I had a son, he would be stomping on the hood of that car a little harder.”

      • Colorado Wellington says:

        I’m not sure he’s there. I don’t see a young man in mommy jeans speaking to the activists on the cruiser:

        “Let me be clear. Change isn’t easy. There will be setbacks and false starts on the headlights and the hood. But let me give a shoutout to the two brothers on the roof!”

        It may be his son didn’t make it to this neighborhood gathering.

  6. BallBounces says:

    Let them end the social injustice where athletes who toss a ball around get millions a year while nursing home nurses and attendants who care for our ill and dying loved ones — the true heroes of our society — get paid peanuts.

    Let them fix this — it’s entirely in their hands to do so — and then we can talk.

    The ball’s in their court.

    • exNOAAman says:

      Paul Bear Bryant, best college coach in history, as head coach at Alabama always insisted his salary be $1 less than the president of the university. He didn’t feel it was right to earn more than the man who could fire him. (Of course, he made major money from outside sources too).BTW, Bear would cut one of these disrespectful players faster than you can say “worthless ingrate”

    • cdquarles says:

      There is no injustice in that whatsoever. Both set of people get paid exactly what they are willing to work for and someone else is willing to pay them.

  7. gator69 says:

    Stop watching.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.