Mann-Made Climate Change – Climate Scientists Changing The Data

In 1979, global cooling since the 1940’s was indisputable.

screen-shot-2016-09-24-at-6-08-33-am-down

Lawrence Journal-World – Google News Archive Search

By 1989, NOAA extended the cooling trend back from 1921 to 1979, and said most warming occurred before 1919.

Image-131-1 (1)

7 Dec 1989, Page 14

A year later, Phil Jones reversed NOAA’s cooling trend, and turned it into half a degree warming from 1890 to 1990.

screen-shot-2016-09-24-at-5-56-28-am-down

31 Aug 1990, Page 11 – The Age at Newspapers.com

And now Gavin Schmidt at NASA has doubled Phil Jones 1890-1990 trend, and turned it into 1.0C warming.

graph-12

graph.png (1130×600)

Climate change is best defined as “a handful of gangsters at government agencies changing data to keep billions of dollars of climate funding pouring in.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Mann-Made Climate Change – Climate Scientists Changing The Data

  1. Steve Case says:

    They’re doing it in broad daylight, and it is testimony to the power of propaganda.

  2. Andy DC says:

    Anyone who lived through the mild early 1950’s and then the freezing cold 1960’s and 1970’s know s that the climate turned much colder.

    Washington, DC averaged nearly 3 times the snowfall from 1958 and 1967 than they did did during the years from 1948 to 1957. Since Bobby Kennedy, Jr. grew up during the unusually snowy years as I did, he has the false impression that DC is a very snowy place. But unlike me, he never looked up the records before shooting off his big yap.

  3. Adrian Vance says:

    This is all amazingly simple:

    CO2 is a “trace gas” in air and is insignificant by definition. It would have to be increased by a factor of 2500 to be considered “significant” or “notable.” To give it the great power claimed is a crime against physical science.

    CO2 absorbs 1/7th as much IR, heat energy, from sunlight per molecule as water vapor which has 188 times as many molecules capturing 1200 times as much heat producing 99.9% of all “global warming.” CO2 does only 0.1% of it. Pushing panic about any effect CO2 could have is clearly a fraud.

    There is no “greenhouse effect” in an atmosphere. A greenhouse has a solid, clear cover trapping heat. The atmosphere does not trap heat as gas molecules cannot form surfaces to work as greenhouses that admit and reflect energy depending on sun angle. Gases do not form surfaces as their molecules are not in contact.

    The Medieval Warming from 800 AD to 1300 AD Micheal Mann erased for his “hockey stick” was several Fahrenheit degrees warmer than anything “global warmers” fear. It was 500 years of world peace and abundance, longest ever.

    Vostock Ice Core data analysis show CO2 rises followed temperature by 800 years 19 times in 450,000 years. Therefore temperature change is cause and CO2 change is effect. This alone refutes the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis.

    Methane is called “a greenhouse gas 20 to 500 times more potent than CO2,” by Heidi Cullen and Jim Hansen, but it is not per the energy absorption chart at the American Meteorological Society. It has an absorption profile very similar to nitrogen which is classified “transparent” to IR, heat waves and is only present to 18 ppm. “Vegans” blame methane in cow flatulence for global warming in their war against meat consumption.

    Carbon combustion generates 80% of our energy. Control and taxing of carbon would give the elected ruling class more power and money than anything since the Magna Carta of 1215 AD.

    Most scientists and science educators work for tax supported institutions. They are eager to help government raise more money for them and they love being seen as “saving the planet.”

    Read the whole story in “Vapor Tiger” at Amazon.com, Kindle $2.99 including a free Kindle reading program for your computer.

    Google “Two Minute Conservative” for more.

  4. Pingback: Mann-Made Climate Change – Climate Scientists Changing The Data - Principia Scientific International

  5. Pingback: Hillary's ties to Monsanto mean more GMOs, less transparency in labeling | |

  6. Pingback: Hillary's Ties to Monsanto Mean More GMOs, Less Transparency in Labeling - xmeeting-com Xmeeting-com.com: Online Dating For Progressive Singles

  7. Pingback: Hillary’s ties to Monsanto mean more GMOs, less transparency in labeling – FTSN Network Newsdesk

  8. Pingback: 5 reasons you should support the Monsanto Tribunal |

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *