Removing The 1940’s Blip

The blog post below about the Congo shows another example of how NOAA has erased the warmth of the 1940s.

In 1974, the National Center For Atmospheric Research showed a large global warming spike to the 1940’s, followed by very rapid cooling back to below 1870’s levels.


14 Jul 1974

NASA and NOAA have since erased the 1940’s warmth and the subsequent cooling.


graph.png (1130×600)

The image below overlays the 1974 NCAR graph on the current NASA graph, at the same scale.


It wasn’t just the top American scientists who saw the decline. Britain’s top scientists  saw the same thing.


14 Jul 1974

In fact, there was unanimous consensus among the world’s scientists that Earth was cooling since 1940.



The post 1940 cooling was indisputable.


Lawrence Journal-World – Google News Archive Search

So how did climate scientists make the 1940’s warmth and subsequent cooling disappear? They got together and decided to erase it.

From: Tom Wigley <>
To: Phil Jones <>
Subject: 1940s
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600
Cc: Ben Santer <>

It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”.

Government climate science is the biggest fraud in history, which is why they and their minions in the press attempt to prosecute and silence anyone who dissents from it.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Removing The 1940’s Blip

  1. Latitude says:

    You know……how many years will it be before we know what the temperature is right now?

  2. LOL in Oregon says:

    but no goberment employees
    …..(“Hi! I’m from the goberment and I’m here to [keep my job] help!”)
    were fired for the modification of these numbers.

  3. Billy Liar says:

    The climate weasel and wiki abuser says the rapid cooling never happened …

    • Neal S says:

      Obviously when you ignore certain facts and evidence, you can come to the conclusion that you had already determined you would come to. Amazing.

      This is certainly something that I could not do. Maybe that is why it pays so well.

  4. Andy Pattullo says:

    Because the “global warming consensus” is the closest phenomenon we have to a new religion, it is interesting to speculate about the “original sin” of this new belief system. The adherents would possible say it is the discovery and use of fossil fuels. I suspect it is, in truth, the very first time a climate “scientist” looked at the data in the context of his/her preferred theory and decided perhaps it would be easier to change the data.

  5. CJ says:

    Correct me please, but it appears you are applying a recent ‘global’ temp chart over a 1974 ‘Northern Hemisphere’ graph. Is there not a ‘global’ temp graph from ’74 to do this comparison?

    • Neal S says:

      The ‘Northern Hemisphere’ writing is near an arrow pointing to a dotted portion of that chart. Wouldn’t it make sense to understand that it is only the dotted leftmost portion of that 74 chart that refers only to ‘Northern Hemisphere’?

      • CJ says:

        That was my question for the esteemed writer of this blog. You ASSUME; I asked a direct question to determine if what you assume is in fact the case OR NOT. I’m just asking Tony to verify that assumption.

  6. Pingback: US Government Climate Fraud: Removing The 1940’s Blip - Principia Scientific International

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *