Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “a globally renowned scholar”
- ” Climate change may be coming for your house”
- “The Floridian quakes with apprehension”
- Milton Propaganda
- “Yes … definitely”
- “Antarctica has turned green”
- Rapidly Intensifying Hurricanes
- Kamala Can Prevent Hurricanes
- The Ultimate Global Warming Test
- “ready for the next one”
- Combining Science And Religion
- 500 Million Years Of Warmer Temperatures
- “Arctic sea ice is headed toward a historic low”
- “Record winter low”
- Kamala Planning Another Half Trillion Dollars For Ukraine
- “the science is absolutely certain”
- Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- AI Climate Math
- AI Math
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “a globally renowned scholar”
- conrad ziefle on “a globally renowned scholar”
- Bob G on “a globally renowned scholar”
- Russell Cook on “a globally renowned scholar”
- arn on “a globally renowned scholar”
- Bill Odom on “a globally renowned scholar”
- Richard E Fritz on “a globally renowned scholar”
- William on “a globally renowned scholar”
- William on “a globally renowned scholar”
- D. Boss on ” Climate change may be coming for your house”
OT: Here you have a new dream couple.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2014/apr/03/earth-has-fever-global-warming
The false grinning and defensive poses inadvertently look quite funny though.
Interesting that Dr. Lamb showed the 20th century temperature as FLAT with maybe a slight downward trend at the end.
Hence the need to “get rid of the MWP!”
Yes they are starting in on the MWP again despite the fact it has been proven to exist in more than Europe.
Some argue that we are at about the same temperature as the MWP. Some say it was just a NH affair. But are we really as warm in the NH as the MWP?
New post from retraction watch http://retractionwatch.com/2014/04/04/journal-that-retracted-conspiracy-ideation-climate-skepticism-paper-says-it-did-not-cave-into-threats/
The take home is:
Of course there is a very simple explanation. The temperature scale on the left hand side is defined such that one mark either up or down signifies a change of .0000001 degrees. Sure, it may look like a wiggly curve to the untrained eye, but Real Climate Scientists recognize it as the unswerving shaft of Mann’s hockey stick.
Crime Alert II: http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2014/04/04/6-Billion-Goes-Missing-State-Department
Crime Alert III Holder and Mueller Spent $7.8 Million on Personal Travel
” as ordinary Americans are required to do….”
And that is why they do not pay. Laws are for little people, not them.
I really do wish I were joking. The old Republic is dead. I am a serf. You are a serf. They are Royals. These are the facts on the ground. Our options to cure this are becoming more and more constrained.
After my tangles with the ‘IN’Justice system in my town I believe you. When the cop who is my neighbor refuses to work in this county because it is so crooked you know it is really bad!
Note that this hand drawn schematic is from the early 60’s, is based only on the temperatures from central England, ends in 1950 so it doesn’t include the last 65 years of temperature data, doesn’t have any uncertainties associated with it, and was never considered representative of northern hemisphere, much less global, temperatures.
So what was your point again?
Why do you keep posting the same bullshit?