If you pay a group of people to find a particular answer, more than 50% of them will normally find that answer. As long as you continue paying them to find that answer, it is likely that the majority will continue to find that answer.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
Recent Comments
- JohnFrancis on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- John Francis on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Stuart Hamish on Extreme Weather
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime
- arn on Analyzing Big City Crime
- Gordon Vigurs on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Gordon Vigurs on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- conrad ziefle on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- arn on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Robertvd on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
…like this one, no doubt ..
“PILTDOWN MAN’S SKULL – “CENTURY’S BIGGEST HOAX””
The famous skull of the Piltdown Man, which was found in a Sussex gravel pit 50 years ago, and has been regarded ever since as an important clue to what the human race was like in prehistoric days, may be the century’s biggest scientific hoax.”
[Until AGW, that is]
~23 Nov 1953
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/27182840?
…or this one..
“GREAT HOAX STORY
These revelations caused a tremendous stir among members of the Institute of France. They were much divided, not only on the authenticity of the discoveries, but as to the periods to which they belonged.” [Sound familiar?]
~2 Dec 1927
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/1220101?
Ivan,
Variously dated to Neolithic, Iron Age and Medieval times, the finds initiated a series of claims, counterclaims and heated debates among French archaeologists. Initially, many experts argued in favor of a hoax, but advanced testing from later decades confirmed that many of the Glozel artifacts were most likely of genuine antiquity. Wikipedia.
Not uncommonly in archaeology things may less cut and dried than first glance may indicate. Like climate science where are egos involved, and there were then as well. The phrase “…confirmed … many…” is a gloss for “all the pieces tested were genuine [since not all pieces were tested, we don’t know if any ringers were slipped in].” Sometimes the hoax is a hoax; sometimes the accusers are blowing smoke. Before 1950 and the inception of C-14 dating the only means of determining genuinety were very limited.
There is such as thing as official science.