If Iceland Likes Their 1940’s Warm Period, They Can’t Keep Their 1940’s Warm Period. Period.

9 Responses to If Iceland Likes Their 1940’s Warm Period, They Can’t Keep Their 1940’s Warm Period. Period.

1. phodges says:

   January 17, 2014 at 2:04 am

   I forgot where I saw it but the Icelandic met does not agree with these adjustments….must of been in comments at wuwt

   Reply
   • stevengoddard says:

     January 17, 2014 at 2:06 am

     Paul Homewood has blogged about that.

     Reply
     • Anto says:

       January 17, 2014 at 12:23 pm

       Steve, I would love to see a chart which overlays each new version of the historical temperature record that NCDC has produced over the years. It would be very powerful, I think.

       Reply
     • Anto says:

       January 17, 2014 at 12:24 pm

       Correction: NASA.

       Reply
2. Andy Oz says:

   January 17, 2014 at 2:23 am

   Iceland successfully told the EU to take a hike after the GFC when they wanted the icelandic people to pay for the bankruptcy of the three main commercial banks. Iceland should tell GISS to take a hike with their fraudulent manipulation of past temperatures, and publish it.

   Reply
   • Andy Oz says:

     January 17, 2014 at 3:00 am

     Big money on the line to prove the skeptical case. Now is your chance to cover some of those costs Steve!! $10,000 bet by Nobel winner.
     http://m.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/nobel-scientist-willing-to-bet-on-global-warming/story-e6frgcjx-1226802801018#mm-premium

     Reply
     • Beale says:

       January 17, 2014 at 9:43 pm

       Think again. Under Schmidt’s terms, he wins if it’s warmer in 20 years, however small the increase. He could well win this bet even if he’s totally wrong, which he is.

       Reply
3. gds44 says:

   January 17, 2014 at 3:56 am

   Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.

   Reply
4. Darkstar says:

   January 17, 2014 at 9:51 pm

   I overlaid both GISS data sets over the ESRL AMO Index
   (for easy viewing, they are lined up for a 0.1 AMO = 0.5 GISS match, with a 0.0 AMO = 5.0 GISS baseline)

   Here is what I found
   http://oi41.tinypic.com/3486pw9.jpg
   …now I don’t even claim to be anything super intelligent like a “Climate Scientist” or anything, but…

   And while not perfect (which I wouldn’t expect anyway) one sure does seem to make much more sense then the other to me (please, correct me if I am wrong)

   Anyone have more instances of data changing? I’ll have the time later this evening to do a couple more

   Reply