21 Feb 1931 – A FICKLE JADE. DOES CLIMATE CHANGE? LONG DISTANC…
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
Recent Comments
- Stuart Hamish on Extreme Weather
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime
- arn on Analyzing Big City Crime
- Gordon Vigurs on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Gordon Vigurs on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- conrad ziefle on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- arn on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Robertvd on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- scott allen on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- arn on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
Oh no,that is a shock. Fancy using actual data,no,tell me it’s not true. We can’t have actual observations/data interfering with our models.
Exactly right. First, from The Economist we have: “The mismatch between rising greenhouse gas emissions and not-rising temperatures [17 year ‘pause’] is among the biggest puzzles in climate science just now.” And now, as time has unfolded, ALL the models have failed… miserably.
And a good wuwt comment from Olaf Dahlsveen: “They are Model Makers, and as long as they put CO2 into their models as being responsible for any earthly temperature rise, then it is quite correct for them to say that «All our models show that CO2 is responsible for the recent warming.>>… Well, that was back in the ’80s and ’90s. But then the warming stopped…”
And the quotes:
“The data doesn’t matter. We’re not basing our recommendations [for CO2 cuts] upon the data. We’re basing them upon the climate models.” -Chriss Folland, UK Meteorological Office
“Rather than seeing models as describing literal truth, we ought to see them as convenient fictions which try to provide something useful [like propaganda?].” -David Frame, Oxford U
The only reason there was a match in the first place is because Mann and Hansen fudged the temperature data and Callendar and Keeling fudged the CO2 data.
See: Exposing the Global Warming Myth – CO2 Levels
(Note this is not on Wussup)