http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/timeseries.global.anom.1979-2008
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
- Geoengineering Genocide
- No Crime On Capitol Hill
- Chief Scientist And Religious Leader
Recent Comments
- Mac on An Inconvenient Truth
- Bob G on Antarctic Meltdown Update
- Bob G on An Inconvenient Truth
- Scott Allen on Antarctic Meltdown Update
- Jehzsa on “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- conrad ziefle on “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- conrad ziefle on Antarctic Meltdown Update
- Mike Peinsipp on “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Mac on Attacks On Democracy
- Mac on Attacks On Democracy
Reblogged this on The Grey Enigma.
Wow!! That’s crazy!!!
But, rowing season is near 😉
6th highest? Unless it is FIRST, it is due to global warming.
(Where did I put the sarc tag?)
What is the source of this data?
see the link below the graph, and yes, it is true. It is the only time in the record of three consecutive years in a row having above average global ice.
Check 1990 – 1992, are you a “warmist”, or do you just have difficulty with statistics?
A quick eyeball at the graph shown would seem to indicate that the average in 1990-1992 could have been high enough to discount those years. Don’t forget that the average will change with each new piece of data.
S.N.
Sorry I missed that. Thanks! Interisting data. I want to cite the source when I use this with my warmest associates.
Don’t the coolest warmists care?
This may sound silly at first…sea ice stats should be published at the equinoxes and solstices and the cross quarters in between …
There is science in the equinoxes and solstices and there is no science in our made up calendar which includes months named after roman emperors