http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/timeseries.global.anom.1979-2008
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- mwhite on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
Reblogged this on The Grey Enigma.
Wow!! That’s crazy!!!
But, rowing season is near 😉
6th highest? Unless it is FIRST, it is due to global warming.
(Where did I put the sarc tag?)
What is the source of this data?
see the link below the graph, and yes, it is true. It is the only time in the record of three consecutive years in a row having above average global ice.
Check 1990 – 1992, are you a “warmist”, or do you just have difficulty with statistics?
A quick eyeball at the graph shown would seem to indicate that the average in 1990-1992 could have been high enough to discount those years. Don’t forget that the average will change with each new piece of data.
S.N.
Sorry I missed that. Thanks! Interisting data. I want to cite the source when I use this with my warmest associates.
Don’t the coolest warmists care?
This may sound silly at first…sea ice stats should be published at the equinoxes and solstices and the cross quarters in between …
There is science in the equinoxes and solstices and there is no science in our made up calendar which includes months named after roman emperors